The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

Officials sought to bar the Balad leader over his October 2023 writing. His lawyers disputed the armed-struggle threshold, and Balad announced withdrawal after a Supreme Court warning.

Sami Abu Shehadeh in a 2021 portrait
Sami Abu Shehadeh in a 2021 portrait

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Overview

Section 7A of Basic Law: The Knesset permits disqualification for support of armed struggle by an enemy state or terrorist organization against Israel. An individual candidate's disqualification requires Supreme Court approval. The committee also voted to disqualify Abu Shehadeh on the separate ground concerning Israel's character as a Jewish and democratic state.

The armed-struggle argument focuses on Abu Shehadeh's October 8, 2023 article. It discusses the attack's military and strategic effects and ends by calling for a political process. Officials seeking exclusion and the defense disagree about how to read that language, what his wider statements establish and whether the evidence satisfies the court's demanding standard. Adalah also alleges unequal treatment of Arab and Jewish candidates. This case concerns his individual candidacy.

People in this case

Case updates

Follow the The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election dispute

Get an email when a substantive statement, response, primary source, material correction or major development is added to this case.

26 updates added in the last 7 days.

We will send a confirmation email first. Important updates only is the default. Every email has a link to stop. How we handle your email.

Timeline

4 timeline entries on this page. Dates: October 8, 2023 to October 1, 2026

  1. October 2023

    1 event

    1. Abu Shehadeh publishes the article later cited in the case

      Source release

      Abu Shehadeh published an Arabic article discussing the October 7 attack's military and strategic effects. Its closing paragraphs call for a political process. Officials later cited the article in seeking his disqualification.

      [01]Al-Aqsa Flood: preliminary observations

      Abu Shehadeh's article discusses the October 7 attack's military and strategic effects and calls for a political process in its closing paragraphs. The title is translated from Arabic. The parties dispute whether its language supports disqualification.

      Al-Aqsa Flood: preliminary observationsOpening, third observation and final two paragraphs; Arabic original.
  2. 1081 days between recorded events

    September 2026

    1 event

    1. Election committee votes to disqualify Abu Shehadeh

      Incident

      The Central Elections Committee voted 30-4 on the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground and 31-4 on the armed-struggle ground. Its written decision, signed the next day, referred the candidate's disqualification to the Supreme Court for approval.

      [02]Central Elections Committee decision on Sami Abu Shehadeh's candidacy, application 8/26

      The written decision records the September 23 votes: 30-4 on the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground and 31-4 on the armed-struggle ground. It refers the individual-candidate disqualification to the Supreme Court for approval.

      Central Elections Committee decision on Sami Abu Shehadeh's candidacy, application 8/26Page 2, paragraphs 6-9; signature dated September 24, 2026.
      [03]Basic Law: The Knesset, English translation

      The Knesset's English text describes the armed-struggle ground and the requirement for Supreme Court approval of an individual candidate's disqualification. This translation is marked current through January 24, 2023.

      Basic Law: The Knesset, English translationPages 4-5, sections 7a(a)(3) and 7a(b).
  3. October 2026

    2 events

    1. Supreme Court signals support for disqualification and recommends withdrawal

      Court reporting said a majority of the nine-justice panel favored disqualification and recommended that Abu Shehadeh withdraw his candidacy. The report did not identify a final judgment approving the committee's decision.

      [04]High Court urges Balad chairman to drop out of elections or face disqualification

      The report describes the justices' indication that a majority favored disqualification and their recommendation that Abu Shehadeh withdraw. It reports a hearing, rather than an operative judgment approving a ban.

    2. Balad announces withdrawal while retaining Abu Shehadeh as leader

      Balad said its leadership had approved withdrawing Abu Shehadeh's candidacy after consulting him and his lawyers. The party said he would remain its leader and criticized restrictions on Arab political representation.

      [05]Balad posts its withdrawal statement and criticism of exclusion

      The party account posts the Arabic withdrawal statement previously reproduced by Knooznet.

      Balad posts its withdrawal statement and criticism of exclusionCaption, second main paragraph, passage about restricting Arab political activity.
      [06]Balad announces withdrawal and objects to political exclusion

      Knooznet reproduces a statement credited to Balad. Its withdrawal announcement was also reported by the Jerusalem Post.

      Balad announces withdrawal and objects to political exclusionStatement paragraph beginning وقال التجمّع; passage about political representation.
      [07]Balad's withdrawal announcement after the Supreme Court hearing

      The updated report says Balad announced that Abu Shehadeh would withdraw after the court indicated that a majority favored disqualification.

      Balad's withdrawal announcement after the Supreme Court hearingOpening paragraph in the update dated October 1, 2026, 23:56.

Response record

Responses

Latest recorded positions: 22. Dates: September 23, 2026 to October 1, 2026

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

22 responses on this page

  1. BaladDirectly involved
    "استخدام الشطب أداةً لتضييق مساحة العمل السياسي العربي وملاحقة المواقف الوطنية الخارجة عن الإجماع الإسرائيلي."
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Balad announces withdrawal while criticizing exclusion. English translation: Using disqualification to restrict Arab political activity and target nationalist positions outside the Israeli consensus.

    Role at the time: Political party chaired by Sami Abu Shehadeh

    Before the statement

    Balad says its leadership approved withdrawal after the court indicated that a majority favored disqualification.

    After the statement

    The party says Abu Shehadeh will remain its leader and urges continued electoral participation.

    Balad posts its withdrawal statement and criticism of exclusionCaption, second main paragraph, passage about restricting Arab political activity.
    Balad announces withdrawal and objects to political exclusionStatement paragraph beginning وقال التجمّع; passage about political representation.
    Balad's withdrawal announcement after the Supreme Court hearingOpening paragraph in the update dated October 1, 2026, 23:56.

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Balad criticizes restrictions on Arab representation. Withdrawal does not retract that criticism.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. Ayman Odeh
    "פסילתו של חברי סמי אבו שחאדה היא הצעד הסופי בהפיכה המשטרית"
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Odeh condemns the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh as part of an attack on democracy. He criticizes the court for pressing an Arab candidate to withdraw his candidacy. English translation: The disqualification of my colleague Sami Abu Shehadeh is the final step in the regime coup.

    Role at the time: Hadash Knesset member and former party leader

    Before the statement

    Odeh responds after the Supreme Court hearing and criticizes supporters of the exclusions of Arab lists and candidates.

    After the statement

    He calls for Jewish-Arab political cooperation and opposition to racism.

    Odeh condemns pressure on Abu Shehadeh to withdrawOriginal Hebrew post; opening paragraphs and later discussion of the court hearing.

    Why this label?

    Odeh explicitly condemns Abu Shehadeh being excluded and the court request that he withdraw.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  3. Ofer Cassif
    "אני מאוד מאוכזב, וכעוס על ההחלטה לגבי חברי סאמי אבו שחאדה."
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Cassif condemns the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh, describing him as an opponent of violence. He contrasts the exclusion with the continued presence of politicians he accuses of calling for genocide. English translation: I am very disappointed and angry about the decision regarding my colleague Sami Abu Shehadeh.

    Role at the time: Hadash member of the Knesset

    Before the statement

    Cassif says he has just left the Supreme Court after the disqualification hearing.

    After the statement

    He calls the move a dangerous precedent and urges political action before the October 27 election.

    Cassif condemns the move to exclude Abu ShehadehOriginal Hebrew post; opening paragraphs and later discussion of the court hearing.

    Why this label?

    Cassif directly opposes excluding Abu Shehadeh and calls it a dangerous precedent.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  4. Itamar Ben-Gvir
    "לייצג את בקשת עוצמה יהודית לפסילת יו״ר בל״ד, סמי אבו שחאדה."
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Ben Gvir says he is appearing as a lawyer to pursue Abu Shehadeh's exclusion. English translation of the excerpt: To represent Otzma Yehudit's request to disqualify Balad chairman Sami Abu Shehadeh.

    Role at the time: National Security Minister of Israel and leader of Otzma Yehudit, representing its disqualification request

    Before the statement

    He says he has put on his lawyer's robe again for this purpose.

    After the statement

    He criticizes the October 8 article and pledges lawful action against people he accuses of supporting terrorism.

    Ben Gvir supports Abu Shehadeh's disqualificationOpening paragraph, clause after the colon.

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh from the election, Ben Gvir supports the request and alleges that its target supports terrorism.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  5. Haaretz
    "Abu Shehadeh's Failure to Condemn Hamas Is Not Grounds for Disqualification"
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Haaretz's editorial opposed disqualifying Abu Shehadeh for failing to condemn Hamas. It also criticized attempts to exclude Arab parties from the Knesset.

    Role at the time: Haaretz editorial board

    Before the statement

    The editorial appeared while the Supreme Court was considering the disqualification.

    After the statement

    Its opening criticized Abu Shehadeh's account of the October 7 attack.

    Haaretz editorial on the grounds for excluding Abu Shehadeh · HaaretzHeadline; article deck and opening paragraph

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, the editorial explicitly rejects the stated ground for the ban. Its criticism of his article does not support disqualification.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  6. Nissim Katz
    "הניסיון להדירו מהזירה הפוליטית הוא שגיאה אסטרטגית"
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Nissim Katz opposed Abu Shehadeh's exclusion, arguing that keeping his views in open political debate was better than pushing his supporters out of parliamentary politics. English translation: The attempt to exclude him from the political arena is a strategic error.

    Role at the time: Communications and politics scholar writing in Israel Hayom

    Before the statement

    Katz described Abu Shehadeh's rhetoric as offensive and said public anger was understandable.

    After the statement

    He argued that a ban would intensify frustration without removing Abu Shehadeh's views or his constituency.

    Nissim Katz argues against excluding Abu ShehadehArticle subtitle; second paragraph; final paragraph

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh from the election, Katz rejects the ban as a strategic error. His criticism of Abu Shehadeh's rhetoric does not weaken that conclusion.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

View all 22 responsesShow fewer responses
  1. Ori Wertman
    "בכך שלא יתערבו בהחלטתה של ועדת הבחירות המרכזית."
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Ori Wertman urged Supreme Court judges to leave the committee's decision in place, expressly including the disqualification of Abu Shehadeh. English translation: by not intervening in the decision of the Central Elections Committee.

    Role at the time: Political scientist writing in Israel Hayom

    Before the statement

    Wertman criticized earlier court decisions that allowed Arab candidates to run and argued that the October 7 attack made this election different.

    After the statement

    His closing paragraph named Abu Shehadeh and Ofer Cassif among candidates who should be excluded.

    Ori Wertman argues for upholding candidate disqualificationsFinal paragraph, especially the call not to intervene in the committee decision and the following sentence naming Abu Shehadeh

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh from the election, Wertman supports the ban and asks the court to uphold the committee's decision.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. Sawsan Zaher
    "This is not present in Sami’s case."
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Sawsan Zaher argued that Abu Shehadeh's case lacked the sustained evidence required to disqualify a candidate for supporting armed struggle.

    Role at the time: Palestinian human rights lawyer

    Before the statement

    Zaher described a requirement for several statements showing that support for armed struggle was central to a candidate's political activity.

    After the statement

    She argued that Balad should contest the ban instead of withdrawing, because withdrawal would achieve exclusion without a court ruling.

    Sawsan Zaher's interview on Abu Shehadeh's exclusionZaher's explanation of the evidentiary threshold in the opening section; her remarks in the withdrawal-dilemma section

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Zaher challenges the evidentiary basis for the ban and urges a legal challenge to it.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  3. Orna Yashar
    "הפסילה המוצדקת של סמי אבו שחאדה"
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Orna Yashar endorsed the committee's decision to disqualify Abu Shehadeh and rejected his explanation that he had not understood the scale of the October 7 killings. English translation: The justified disqualification of Sami Abu Shehadeh.

    Role at the time: Mida writer and political interviewer

    Before the statement

    Yashar reviewed arguments at the Central Elections Committee hearing, including the October 8 article and Abu Shehadeh's response.

    After the statement

    She described the vote and noted that the case would go to the Supreme Court.

    Orna Yashar on the disqualification of Sami Abu ShehadehHeadline, opening commentary, and paragraph after Abu Shehadeh's explanation in the defense section

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh from the election, Yashar calls the disqualification justified in her signed article and endorses the committee's decision.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  4. Sami Abu ShehadehDirectly involved
    "Upholding this ban would extinguish what little democratic space remains."
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Abu Shehadeh says approving his exclusion would damage democratic participation and argues that the court should assess his case without political pressure.

    Role at the time: Balad chairman and former Knesset member contesting his disqualification

    Before the statement

    The interviewer asks whether support from the Zionist left gave the court political cover to uphold the ban.

    After the statement

    He argues that treating his article as sufficient while permitting Ben Gvir to run would apply an indefensible standard.

    Abu Shehadeh criticizes the campaign to exclude himAnswer to the question about whether support from the Zionist left gave the court political cover.

    Why this label?

    Relative to his exclusion, Abu Shehadeh expressly criticizes the ban and its consequences. His conditional wording describes a threatened outcome, not conditional support.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  5. Adalah - The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel
    "the disqualification process is tainted by unlawful discrimination and selective enforcement."
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Adalah argues that excluding Abu Shehadeh would rest on insufficient evidence and unequal treatment of Arab and Jewish candidates.

    Role at the time: Legal organization representing Sami Abu Shehadeh before the Supreme Court

    Before the statement

    Adalah cites his broader opposition to violence and says the committee assessed the article in isolation.

    After the statement

    It compares the treatment of far-right Jewish parties and argues that electoral safeguards should not vary by national identity.

    Adalah challenges the evidence for barring Abu ShehadehSection headed Former MK Dr. Sami Abu Shehadeh; paragraph on discrimination and selective enforcement.

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Adalah expressly criticizes the process and its evidentiary basis. Its legal argument rejects the proposed action.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  6. Gali Baharav-Miara
    "يجب المصادقة على شطب ترشيح سامي أبو شحادة بسبب دعمه للنضال المسلح ضد دولة إسرائيل"
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Baharav-Miara and State Attorney Amit Aisman seek court approval. English translation of the excerpt: Sami Abu Shehadeh's disqualification should be approved because he supports armed struggle against the State of Israel.

    Role at the time: Attorney General of Israel, in a joint statement with State Attorney Amit Aisman

    Before the statement

    The statement concerns the committee decision awaiting Supreme Court approval.

    After the statement

    It cites the article's timing and content. Separate reporting says she opposed the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground.

    Baharav-Miara and Aisman ask the court to approve exclusionFirst quoted paragraph of the joint statement, beginning وجاء في بيان مشترك.
    Report on the attorney general's September 29 submissionOpening paragraphs and section on disqualification under the Basic Law.

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, the joint statement expressly supports approval. Rejecting another legal ground leaves that conclusion intact.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  7. Ben Caspit
    "פסילתו של סמי אבו שחאדה היא הפסילה המוצדקת ביותר מאז המצאת הפסלוּת."
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Ben Caspit endorsed Abu Shehadeh's disqualification, arguing that his description of the October 7 attack crossed a limit for a legislator. English translation: The disqualification of Sami Abu Shehadeh is the most justified disqualification since disqualification was invented.

    Role at the time: Israeli political columnist writing in Walla

    Before the statement

    Caspit discussed the Central Elections Committee's decisions on individual candidates and Arab party lists.

    After the statement

    He opposed excluding Ra'am and the Joint List and called for greater Arab participation in Israeli public life.

    Ben Caspit opinion on election politics and candidate disqualificationSection headed כולנו בסירה אחת, second paragraph

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh from the election, Caspit expressly supports the ban. His opposition to excluding other Arab parties does not qualify his support for this individual disqualification.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  8. Sheldon Kirshner
    "Abu Shehadeh crossed a red line when he broke a basic law"
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Sheldon Kirshner backed the decision to exclude Abu Shehadeh, arguing that his article breached the prohibition on supporting armed struggle against Israel.

    Role at the time: Journalist and political commentator

    Before the statement

    Kirshner described the committee's decision to bar Abu Shehadeh from the election.

    After the statement

    He opposed the committee's bans on other Arab party lists and noted that the Supreme Court still had to approve the individual disqualification.

    Sheldon Kirshner supports the decision to bar Abu ShehadehSecond paragraph; following paragraph distinguishes individual disqualification from bans on other lists

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Kirshner supports the ban. His opposition to excluding other party lists concerns separate decisions.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  9. Dahlia Scheindlin
    "It's hard to choose a single killer argument against banning Sami Abu Shehadeh from running for the Knesset."
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Dahlia Scheindlin opposed excluding Abu Shehadeh. She criticized his description of the attack but pointed to his expression of regret.

    Role at the time: Political analyst and Haaretz columnist

    Before the statement

    The column followed the committee's decision to disqualify Abu Shehadeh.

    After the statement

    The opening states that there are several arguments against the ban.

    Dahlia Scheindlin argues against Abu Shehadeh's exclusion · HaaretzOpening sentence; headline and article deck

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Scheindlin expressly rejects the ban. Her criticism of his wording does not qualify that conclusion.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  10. Baruch Kra
    "היועמ"שית בהחלט סיפקה בסיס ערכי מנומק לפסילת אבו שחאדה"
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Baruch Kra argued that the attorney general should have recommended disqualification and supported Noam Sohlberg's vote to bar Abu Shehadeh. English translation: The attorney general certainly provided a reasoned moral basis for disqualifying Abu Shehadeh.

    Role at the time: Legal affairs commentator writing in Walla

    Before the statement

    Kra acknowledged the precedent requiring accumulated statements and described this case as exceptional.

    After the statement

    He argued that an apology could not erase the article's significance. He also criticized attempts to ban other Arab parties.

    Baruch Kra on Sohlberg's vote to disqualify Abu ShehadehParagraph beginning היועמ"שית בהחלט סיפקה
    Baruch Kra confirms his support for disqualificationOriginal Hebrew clarification and linked preceding post.

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh from the election, Kra supports the ban on moral grounds. His acknowledgment of a legal obstacle does not make his conclusion conditional.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  11. Ahmad Tibi
    "مقصلة للأحزاب العربية"
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Tibi criticizes the exclusions of Abu Shehadeh, Ofer Cassif and the Arab lists as an attack on Arab political representation. English translation: A guillotine for the Arab parties.

    Role at the time: Ta'al leader and Knesset member

    Before the statement

    In a Radio al-Shams interview the day after the committee vote, Tibi discusses the exclusions of Ra'am, the Joint List, Cassif and Abu Shehadeh.

    After the statement

    He expresses concern about Sohlberg participating in the vote and hopes the Supreme Court will protect the rights to vote and stand for election.

    Ahmad Tibi criticizes disqualifications including Abu ShehadehOpening paragraphs and section headed "مقصلة" تطال القوائم.

    Why this label?

    Tibi condemns the disqualifications, expressly including Abu Shehadeh, as an attack on Arab political representation.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  12. Yair Golan
    "אין הנחות לאבו שחאדה ואין הנחות לבן גביר - את שניהם צריך לפסול."
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Golan supports excluding Abu Shehadeh, citing his interpretation of the October 2023 article. He says the same rule should apply to Ben-Gvir. English translation: No leniency for Abu Shehadeh and no leniency for Ben-Gvir. Both should be disqualified.

    Role at the time: Leader of the Democrats party

    Before the statement

    Golan defends Arab citizens rights to vote and stand for election, while saying Abu Shehadeh crossed a line by legitimizing armed struggle and harm to civilians.

    After the statement

    He opposes blanket bans on Arab lists and calls for Jewish-Arab political partnership.

    Yair Golan supports disqualifying Abu Shehadeh and Ben-GvirParagraph beginning אין הנחות; read with the opening defense of Arab citizens voting rights and preceding discussion of the article.

    Why this label?

    Golan expressly supports individual exclusion. His opposition to blanket bans on other lists does not qualify that support.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  13. Noam Sohlberg
    "בדבריו לא מצאתי מענה שיכול להניח את הדעת"
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Sohlberg says Abu Shehadeh failed to answer the allegations against him and joins the committee vote to disqualify him on the armed-struggle ground. English translation: I found no satisfactory answer in his remarks.

    Role at the time: Chair of the Central Elections Committee and deputy president of the Supreme Court

    Before the statement

    Sohlberg says he had intended to follow previous committee chairs by remaining neutral.

    After the statement

    He explains that the evidence justified his unusual decision to vote. The written decision records his participation in the armed-struggle vote and refers the exclusion for Supreme Court approval.

    Election committee debate and officials reactions, September 23Lazimi: 11:11 entry by Amit Segal and Dvir Jabra. Sohlberg: 13:09 entry by Inbar Twyzer and Dvir Jabra.
    Sohlberg joins vote to disqualify Abu ShehadehSection describing Sohlberg participating in the vote.
    Central Elections Committee decision on Sami Abu Shehadeh's candidacy, application 8/26Page 2, paragraphs 6-9; signature dated September 24, 2026.

    Why this label?

    Sohlberg endorses disqualification through both his stated reasoning and his committee vote.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  14. Yisrael Beiteinu
    "לכן נצביע בעד פסילת הרשימה המשותפת, רע״מ, עופר כסיף וסמי אבו שחאדה"
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Yisrael Beiteinu announces that it will vote to disqualify Abu Shehadeh alongside Ofer Cassif and two Arab lists. The party argues that opposition to eliminating Hamas is incompatible with Knesset membership. English translation: Therefore we will vote to disqualify the Joint List, Ra'am, Ofer Cassif and Sami Abu Shehadeh.

    Role at the time: Political party announcing its voting position

    Before the statement

    The party says eliminating Hamas should be a central security aim of the next government.

    After the statement

    Its announcement separately names Abu Shehadeh among the candidates and lists it will vote to exclude.

    Yisrael Beiteinu announces support for disqualifying Arab lists and candidatesConcluding sentence of the party statement naming the Joint List, Raam, Ofer Cassif and Sami Abu Shehadeh.

    Why this label?

    The party explicitly commits to supporting disqualification.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  15. Naama Lazimi
    "אנחנו בעד פסילת אבו שחאדה, אמירותיו מחפירות"
    Defended or excused

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Lazimi says her party supports disqualifying Abu Shehadeh and criticizes his statements. English translation: We support disqualifying Abu Shehadeh; his statements are disgraceful.

    Role at the time: Democrats member of the Knesset

    Before the statement

    Lazimi speaks to Army Radio as the Central Elections Committee considers disqualification requests.

    After the statement

    Her position agrees with party leader Yair Golan supporting the individual exclusion.

    Election committee debate and officials reactions, September 23Lazimi: 11:11 entry by Amit Segal and Dvir Jabra. Sohlberg: 13:09 entry by Inbar Twyzer and Dvir Jabra.
    Naama Lazimi supports disqualifying Abu ShehadehParagraph attributing Lazimi remarks to Army Radio.

    Why this label?

    Lazimi explicitly endorses disqualification.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  16. Yuval Yoaz
    "אין בדברים אלה כדי להצדיק פסילה מהתמודדות."
    Condemned

    Case context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

    Read more

    Yoaz argues that the existing legal standard does not justify barring Abu Shehadeh, despite his criticism of the article. English translation: These statements do not justify disqualification from running.

    Role at the time: Lawyer and legal commentator writing in Zman Israel

    Before the statement

    He says he views the article as supporting a terrorist organization's armed struggle, but argues that the evidence fails the repeated-conduct standard.

    After the statement

    He also argues that the separate Jewish-and-democratic-state ground does not justify exclusion.

    Yuval Yoaz argues the evidence does not justify disqualificationParagraph beginning על היועצת הייתה מוטלת חובה; final clause. Read with the earlier paragraphs on the 2020 Yazbak ruling and the closing discussion of the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground.

    Why this label?

    Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Yoaz expressly rejects the legal justification. His criticism of the article does not qualify his opposition to the ban.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

Sources

(32)

Original text

Central Elections Committee decision on Sami Abu Shehadeh's candidacy, application 8/26

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Page 2, paragraphs 6-9; signature dated September 24, 2026.

About this source

The written decision records the September 23 votes: 30-4 on the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground and 31-4 on the armed-struggle ground. It refers the individual-candidate disqualification to the Supreme Court for approval.

Author
Central Elections Committee for the 26th Knesset
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Interview

Sawsan Zaher's interview on Abu Shehadeh's exclusion

Sawsan Zaher's interview on Abu Shehadeh's exclusion (opens in a new tab)Zaher's explanation of the evidentiary threshold in the opening section; her remarks in the withdrawal-dilemma section
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Zaher's explanation of the evidentiary threshold in the opening section; her remarks in the withdrawal-dilemma section

About this source

Reporting with directly attributed interview comments by Zaher on the legal threshold and Balad's response.

Author
Samah Watad
Published
Accessed

Original text

Haaretz editorial on the grounds for excluding Abu Shehadeh

Haaretz editorial on the grounds for excluding Abu Shehadeh (opens in a new tab) · HaaretzHeadline; article deck and opening paragraph
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Headline; article deck and opening paragraph

About this source

Institutional editorial opposing the stated grounds for disqualification.

Author
Haaretz Editorial
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Analysis

Dahlia Scheindlin argues against Abu Shehadeh's exclusion

Dahlia Scheindlin argues against Abu Shehadeh's exclusion (opens in a new tab) · HaaretzOpening sentence; headline and article deck
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening sentence; headline and article deck

About this source

Signed column rejecting the ban and discussing Abu Shehadeh's expression of regret.

Author
Dahlia Scheindlin
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Analysis

Sheldon Kirshner supports the decision to bar Abu Shehadeh

Sheldon Kirshner supports the decision to bar Abu Shehadeh (opens in a new tab)Second paragraph; following paragraph distinguishes individual disqualification from bans on other lists
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Second paragraph; following paragraph distinguishes individual disqualification from bans on other lists

About this source

Signed opinion. The author's legal characterization is presented as his argument.

Author
Sheldon Kirshner
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Analysis

Ori Wertman argues for upholding candidate disqualifications

Ori Wertman argues for upholding candidate disqualifications (opens in a new tab)Final paragraph, especially the call not to intervene in the committee decision and the following sentence naming Abu Shehadeh
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Final paragraph, especially the call not to intervene in the committee decision and the following sentence naming Abu Shehadeh

About this source

Signed opinion reviewing past candidate-disqualification cases and urging the court to leave the 2026 committee decisions in place.

Author
Ori Wertman
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Analysis

Nissim Katz argues against excluding Abu Shehadeh

Nissim Katz argues against excluding Abu Shehadeh (opens in a new tab)Article subtitle; second paragraph; final paragraph
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Article subtitle; second paragraph; final paragraph

About this source

Signed opinion arguing for political contestation of Abu Shehadeh's views and against removing him from the election.

Author
Nissim Katz
Published
Accessed

Analysis

Orna Yashar on the disqualification of Sami Abu Shehadeh

Orna Yashar on the disqualification of Sami Abu Shehadeh (opens in a new tab)Headline, opening commentary, and paragraph after Abu Shehadeh's explanation in the defense section
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Headline, opening commentary, and paragraph after Abu Shehadeh's explanation in the defense section

About this source

Signed Mida commentary endorsing the committee decision and reviewing the arguments at its hearing.

Author
Orna Yashar
Published
Accessed

Original post

Baruch Kra confirms his support for disqualification

Baruch Kra confirms his support for disqualification (opens in a new tab)Original Hebrew clarification and linked preceding post.

About this source

Kra confirms that he supports disqualification while criticizing the proposal for withdrawal without a written judgment.

Author
Baruch Kra
Published
Accessed

Analysis

Baruch Kra on Sohlberg's vote to disqualify Abu Shehadeh

Baruch Kra on Sohlberg's vote to disqualify Abu Shehadeh (opens in a new tab)Paragraph beginning היועמ"שית בהחלט סיפקה
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraph beginning היועמ"שית בהחלט סיפקה

About this source

Signed opinion column contrasting the legal test for candidate exclusion with Kra's argument for disqualification in this case.

Author
Baruch Kra
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Analysis

Ben Caspit opinion on election politics and candidate disqualification

Ben Caspit opinion on election politics and candidate disqualification (opens in a new tab)Section headed כולנו בסירה אחת, second paragraph
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Section headed כולנו בסירה אחת, second paragraph

About this source

Signed opinion column. Caspit supports Abu Shehadeh's individual disqualification while opposing the bans on Ra'am and the Joint List.

Author
Ben Caspit
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original post

Odeh condemns pressure on Abu Shehadeh to withdraw

Odeh condemns pressure on Abu Shehadeh to withdraw (opens in a new tab)Original Hebrew post; opening paragraphs and later discussion of the court hearing.

About this source

The speaker criticizes the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh after the October 1 hearing. His description of a decision is his own characterization.

Author
Ayman Odeh
Published
Accessed

Original post

Cassif condemns the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh

Cassif condemns the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh (opens in a new tab)Original Hebrew post; opening paragraphs and later discussion of the court hearing.

About this source

The speaker criticizes the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh after the October 1 hearing. His description of a decision is his own characterization.

Author
Ofer Cassif
Published
Accessed

Reporting

Sohlberg joins vote to disqualify Abu Shehadeh

Sohlberg joins vote to disqualify Abu Shehadeh (opens in a new tab)Section describing Sohlberg participating in the vote.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Section describing Sohlberg participating in the vote.

About this source

The report quotes Sohlberg explaining why he supported disqualification.

Author
Amir Ettinger and Shilo Freid
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Yisrael Beiteinu says it will vote for disqualification

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Party statement quoted in the body.

About this source

Walla independently reports the party announcement at 07:32 on September 23.

Author
Avi Solomon
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Yisrael Beiteinu announces support for disqualifying Arab lists and candidates

Yisrael Beiteinu announces support for disqualifying Arab lists and candidates (opens in a new tab)Concluding sentence of the party statement naming the Joint List, Raam, Ofer Cassif and Sami Abu Shehadeh.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Concluding sentence of the party statement naming the Joint List, Raam, Ofer Cassif and Sami Abu Shehadeh.

About this source

N12 quotes the party announcement that its representatives will support disqualification.

Author
Amit Segal
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Naama Lazimi supports disqualifying Abu Shehadeh

Naama Lazimi supports disqualifying Abu Shehadeh (opens in a new tab)Paragraph attributing Lazimi remarks to Army Radio.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraph attributing Lazimi remarks to Army Radio.

About this source

The report independently quotes Lazimi supporting disqualification.

Author
Kobi Israel
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Election committee debate and officials reactions, September 23

Election committee debate and officials reactions, September 23 (opens in a new tab)Lazimi: 11:11 entry by Amit Segal and Dvir Jabra. Sohlberg: 13:09 entry by Inbar Twyzer and Dvir Jabra.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Lazimi: 11:11 entry by Amit Segal and Dvir Jabra. Sohlberg: 13:09 entry by Inbar Twyzer and Dvir Jabra.

About this source

The liveblog quotes Lazimi on Army Radio and Sohlberg explaining his committee vote.

Author
N12
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Interview

Ahmad Tibi criticizes disqualifications including Abu Shehadeh

Ahmad Tibi criticizes disqualifications including Abu Shehadeh (opens in a new tab)Opening paragraphs and section headed "مقصلة" تطال القوائم.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs and section headed "مقصلة" تطال القوائم.

About this source

Radio al-Shams reports its own telephone interview with Tibi on its First News program. The article explicitly includes Abu Shehadeh and Cassif among the exclusions he criticizes.

Author
Nabil Salameh
Published
Accessed

Original post

Yair Golan supports disqualifying Abu Shehadeh and Ben-Gvir

Yair Golan supports disqualifying Abu Shehadeh and Ben-Gvir (opens in a new tab)Paragraph beginning אין הנחות; read with the opening defense of Arab citizens voting rights and preceding discussion of the article.

About this source

Golan supports excluding Abu Shehadeh individually while opposing blanket exclusion of Arab lists.

Author
Yair Golan
Published
Accessed

Analysis

Yuval Yoaz argues the evidence does not justify disqualification

Yuval Yoaz argues the evidence does not justify disqualification (opens in a new tab)Paragraph beginning על היועצת הייתה מוטלת חובה; final clause. Read with the earlier paragraphs on the 2020 Yazbak ruling and the closing discussion of the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraph beginning על היועצת הייתה מוטלת חובה; final clause. Read with the earlier paragraphs on the 2020 Yazbak ruling and the closing discussion of the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground.

About this source

Yoaz's legal commentary rejects disqualification under the existing precedents while sharply criticizing Abu Shehadeh's October 2023 article.

Author
Yuval Yoaz
Published
Accessed

Original post

Balad posts its withdrawal statement and criticism of exclusion

Balad posts its withdrawal statement and criticism of exclusion (opens in a new tab)Caption, second main paragraph, passage about restricting Arab political activity.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Caption, second main paragraph, passage about restricting Arab political activity.

About this source

The party account posts the Arabic withdrawal statement previously reproduced by Knooznet.

Author
Balad
Published
Accessed

Reporting

Balad's withdrawal announcement after the Supreme Court hearing

Balad's withdrawal announcement after the Supreme Court hearing (opens in a new tab)Opening paragraph in the update dated October 1, 2026, 23:56.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraph in the update dated October 1, 2026, 23:56.

About this source

The updated report says Balad announced that Abu Shehadeh would withdraw after the court indicated that a majority favored disqualification.

Author
Sarah Ben-Nun
Published
Accessed

Reporting

Report on the attorney general's September 29 submission

Report on the attorney general's September 29 submission (opens in a new tab)Opening paragraphs and section on disqualification under the Basic Law.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs and section on disqualification under the Basic Law.

About this source

The Jerusalem Post reports support for exclusion on the armed-struggle ground and opposition to the separate Jewish-and-democratic-state ground.

Author
Sarah Ben-Nun
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Baharav-Miara and Aisman ask the court to approve exclusion

Baharav-Miara and Aisman ask the court to approve exclusion (opens in a new tab)First quoted paragraph of the joint statement, beginning وجاء في بيان مشترك.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: First quoted paragraph of the joint statement, beginning وجاء في بيان مشترك.

About this source

Panet quotes a joint statement attributed to Baharav-Miara and Aisman, distributed by the justice spokesperson's office.

Author
Shehadeh Sami Azem
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Balad announces withdrawal and objects to political exclusion

Balad announces withdrawal and objects to political exclusion (opens in a new tab)Statement paragraph beginning وقال التجمّع; passage about political representation.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Statement paragraph beginning وقال التجمّع; passage about political representation.

About this source

Knooznet reproduces a statement credited to Balad. Its withdrawal announcement was also reported by the Jerusalem Post.

Author
Balad, reproduced by Knooznet
Published
Accessed

Interview

Abu Shehadeh criticizes the campaign to exclude him

Abu Shehadeh criticizes the campaign to exclude him (opens in a new tab)Answer to the question about whether support from the Zionist left gave the court political cover.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Answer to the question about whether support from the Zionist left gave the court political cover.

About this source

The New Arab's direct interview, edited for clarity and brevity.

Author
Abed Abou Shhadeh and Rabeea Eid
Published
Accessed

Official statement

Adalah challenges the evidence for barring Abu Shehadeh

Adalah challenges the evidence for barring Abu Shehadeh (opens in a new tab)Section headed Former MK Dr. Sami Abu Shehadeh; paragraph on discrimination and selective enforcement.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Section headed Former MK Dr. Sami Abu Shehadeh; paragraph on discrimination and selective enforcement.

About this source

Adalah describes its argument on behalf of Abu Shehadeh before the Supreme Court.

Author
Adalah
Published
Accessed

Original post

Ben Gvir supports Abu Shehadeh's disqualification

About this source

Ben Gvir's Hebrew post about representing Otzma Yehudit's request to bar Abu Shehadeh.

Author
Itamar Ben-Gvir
Published
Accessed

Reporting

High Court urges Balad chairman to drop out of elections or face disqualification

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening four paragraphs and final paragraph.

About this source

The report describes the justices' indication that a majority favored disqualification and their recommendation that Abu Shehadeh withdraw. It reports a hearing, rather than an operative judgment approving a ban.

Author
Ariela Karmel and Times of Israel staff
Published
Accessed

Original text

Basic Law: The Knesset, English translation

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Pages 4-5, sections 7a(a)(3) and 7a(b).

About this source

The Knesset's English text describes the armed-struggle ground and the requirement for Supreme Court approval of an individual candidate's disqualification. This translation is marked current through January 24, 2023.

Author
Knesset
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Al-Aqsa Flood: preliminary observations

Al-Aqsa Flood: preliminary observations (opens in a new tab)Opening, third observation and final two paragraphs; Arabic original.
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening, third observation and final two paragraphs; Arabic original.

About this source

Abu Shehadeh's article discusses the October 7 attack's military and strategic effects and calls for a political process in its closing paragraphs. The title is translated from Arabic. The parties dispute whether its language supports disqualification.

Author
Sami Abu Shehadeh
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Case updates

Follow the The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election dispute

Get an email when a substantive statement, response, primary source, material correction or major development is added to this case.

26 updates added in the last 7 days.

We will send a confirmation email first. Important updates only is the default. Every email has a link to stop. How we handle your email.

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/cases/sami-abu-shehadeh-knesset-disqualification-2026

The Dispute Index. "The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/cases/sami-abu-shehadeh-knesset-disqualification-2026