Sawsan Zaher says Abu Shehadeh's case lacks the required evidence

Sawsan ZaherPalestinian human rights lawyer

Sawsan Zaher argued that Abu Shehadeh's case lacked the sustained evidence required to disqualify a candidate for supporting armed struggle.

“This is not present in Sami’s case.”

Interview

Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Sawsan Zaher's interview on Abu Shehadeh's exclusionZaher's explanation of the evidentiary threshold in the opening section; her remarks in the withdrawal-dilemma section
Sami Abu Shehadeh in a 2021 portrait
Credit: Amir Deeb / Joint List / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0

Where this statement fits

The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election

Israel's Central Elections Committee voted on September 23, 2026 to disqualify Balad leader Sami Abu Shehadeh from the October 27 Knesset election. The dispute centers on whether his writing about the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack meets the legal threshold for supporting armed struggle against Israel. Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara supported disqualification. Abu Shehadeh and his lawyers at Adalah challenged the evidence and described the effort as an attack on Arab political representation. At an October 1 hearing, the Supreme Court indicated that a majority favored disqualification and recommended withdrawal, according to court reporting. Balad subsequently announced that its leadership had agreed to withdraw his candidacy while retaining him as party leader. We have not located a final judgment approving the disqualification or an order accepting a formal withdrawal.

Read the full case

Source and context

Interview

Sawsan Zaher's interview on Abu Shehadeh's exclusion (opens in a new tab)Zaher's explanation of the evidentiary threshold in the opening section; her remarks in the withdrawal-dilemma section

About this source

Reporting with directly attributed interview comments by Zaher on the legal threshold and Balad's response.

Before the quotation

Zaher described a requirement for several statements showing that support for armed struggle was central to a candidate's political activity.

After the quotation

She argued that Balad should contest the ban instead of withdrawing, because withdrawal would achieve exclusion without a court ruling.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Zaher challenges the evidentiary basis for the ban and urges a legal challenge to it.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Sawsan Zaher says Abu Shehadeh's case lacks the required evidence
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4393-sawsan-zaher-argued-that-abu-shehadeh-s-case

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Sawsan Zaher says Abu Shehadeh's case lacks the required evidence". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/4393-sawsan-zaher-argued-that-abu-shehadeh-s-case