The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Officials sought to bar the Balad leader over his October 2023 writing. His lawyers disputed the armed-struggle threshold, and Balad announced withdrawal after a Supreme Court warning.
Case period:
Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated
Overview
Section 7A of Basic Law: The Knesset permits disqualification for support of armed struggle by an enemy state or terrorist organization against Israel. An individual candidate's disqualification requires Supreme Court approval. The committee also voted to disqualify Abu Shehadeh on the separate ground concerning Israel's character as a Jewish and democratic state.
The armed-struggle argument focuses on Abu Shehadeh's October 8, 2023 article. It discusses the attack's military and strategic effects and ends by calling for a political process. Officials seeking exclusion and the defense disagree about how to read that language, what his wider statements establish and whether the evidence satisfies the court's demanding standard. Adalah also alleges unequal treatment of Arab and Jewish candidates. This case concerns his individual candidacy.
People in this case
- Sami Abu ShehadehDirectly involved
Ayman OdehCommented
Ofer CassifCommented
Dahlia ScheindlinCommented
Timeline
4 timeline entries on this page. Dates: October 8, 2023 to October 1, 2026
October 2023
1 event
Abu Shehadeh publishes the article later cited in the case
Source release
Abu Shehadeh published an Arabic article discussing the October 7 attack's military and strategic effects. Its closing paragraphs call for a political process. Officials later cited the article in seeking his disqualification.
[01]Al-Aqsa Flood: preliminary observations
Abu Shehadeh's article discusses the October 7 attack's military and strategic effects and calls for a political process in its closing paragraphs. The title is translated from Arabic. The parties dispute whether its language supports disqualification.
Al-Aqsa Flood: preliminary observationsOpening, third observation and final two paragraphs; Arabic original.
1081 days between recorded events
September 2026
1 event
Election committee votes to disqualify Abu Shehadeh
Incident
The Central Elections Committee voted 30-4 on the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground and 31-4 on the armed-struggle ground. Its written decision, signed the next day, referred the candidate's disqualification to the Supreme Court for approval.
[02]Central Elections Committee decision on Sami Abu Shehadeh's candidacy, application 8/26
The written decision records the September 23 votes: 30-4 on the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground and 31-4 on the armed-struggle ground. It refers the individual-candidate disqualification to the Supreme Court for approval.
Central Elections Committee decision on Sami Abu Shehadeh's candidacy, application 8/26Page 2, paragraphs 6-9; signature dated September 24, 2026.[03]Basic Law: The Knesset, English translation
The Knesset's English text describes the armed-struggle ground and the requirement for Supreme Court approval of an individual candidate's disqualification. This translation is marked current through January 24, 2023.
Basic Law: The Knesset, English translationPages 4-5, sections 7a(a)(3) and 7a(b).
October 2026
2 events
Supreme Court signals support for disqualification and recommends withdrawal
Court reporting said a majority of the nine-justice panel favored disqualification and recommended that Abu Shehadeh withdraw his candidacy. The report did not identify a final judgment approving the committee's decision.
[04]High Court urges Balad chairman to drop out of elections or face disqualification
The report describes the justices' indication that a majority favored disqualification and their recommendation that Abu Shehadeh withdraw. It reports a hearing, rather than an operative judgment approving a ban.
High Court urges Balad chairman to drop out of elections or face disqualificationOpening four paragraphs and final paragraph.Balad announces withdrawal while retaining Abu Shehadeh as leader
Balad said its leadership had approved withdrawing Abu Shehadeh's candidacy after consulting him and his lawyers. The party said he would remain its leader and criticized restrictions on Arab political representation.
[05]Balad posts its withdrawal statement and criticism of exclusion
The party account posts the Arabic withdrawal statement previously reproduced by Knooznet.
Balad posts its withdrawal statement and criticism of exclusionCaption, second main paragraph, passage about restricting Arab political activity.[06]Balad announces withdrawal and objects to political exclusion
Knooznet reproduces a statement credited to Balad. Its withdrawal announcement was also reported by the Jerusalem Post.
Balad announces withdrawal and objects to political exclusionStatement paragraph beginning وقال التجمّع; passage about political representation.[07]Balad's withdrawal announcement after the Supreme Court hearing
The updated report says Balad announced that Abu Shehadeh would withdraw after the court indicated that a majority favored disqualification.
Balad's withdrawal announcement after the Supreme Court hearingOpening paragraph in the update dated October 1, 2026, 23:56.
Response record
Responses
Latest recorded positions: 22. Dates: September 23, 2026 to October 1, 2026
Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.
11 responses on this page
BaladDirectly involved"استخدام الشطب أداةً لتضييق مساحة العمل السياسي العربي وملاحقة المواقف الوطنية الخارجة عن الإجماع الإسرائيلي."
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Balad announces withdrawal while criticizing exclusion. English translation: Using disqualification to restrict Arab political activity and target nationalist positions outside the Israeli consensus.
Role at the time: Political party chaired by Sami Abu Shehadeh
Before the statement
Balad says its leadership approved withdrawal after the court indicated that a majority favored disqualification.
After the statement
The party says Abu Shehadeh will remain its leader and urges continued electoral participation.
Balad posts its withdrawal statement and criticism of exclusionCaption, second main paragraph, passage about restricting Arab political activity.Balad announces withdrawal and objects to political exclusionStatement paragraph beginning وقال التجمّع; passage about political representation.Balad's withdrawal announcement after the Supreme Court hearingOpening paragraph in the update dated October 1, 2026, 23:56.Why this label?
Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Balad criticizes restrictions on Arab representation. Withdrawal does not retract that criticism.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Ayman Odeh"פסילתו של חברי סמי אבו שחאדה היא הצעד הסופי בהפיכה המשטרית"
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Odeh condemns the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh as part of an attack on democracy. He criticizes the court for pressing an Arab candidate to withdraw his candidacy. English translation: The disqualification of my colleague Sami Abu Shehadeh is the final step in the regime coup.
Role at the time: Hadash Knesset member and former party leader
Before the statement
Odeh responds after the Supreme Court hearing and criticizes supporters of the exclusions of Arab lists and candidates.
After the statement
He calls for Jewish-Arab political cooperation and opposition to racism.
Odeh condemns pressure on Abu Shehadeh to withdrawOriginal Hebrew post; opening paragraphs and later discussion of the court hearing.Why this label?
Odeh explicitly condemns Abu Shehadeh being excluded and the court request that he withdraw.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Ofer Cassif"אני מאוד מאוכזב, וכעוס על ההחלטה לגבי חברי סאמי אבו שחאדה."
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Cassif condemns the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh, describing him as an opponent of violence. He contrasts the exclusion with the continued presence of politicians he accuses of calling for genocide. English translation: I am very disappointed and angry about the decision regarding my colleague Sami Abu Shehadeh.
Role at the time: Hadash member of the Knesset
Before the statement
Cassif says he has just left the Supreme Court after the disqualification hearing.
After the statement
He calls the move a dangerous precedent and urges political action before the October 27 election.
Cassif condemns the move to exclude Abu ShehadehOriginal Hebrew post; opening paragraphs and later discussion of the court hearing.Why this label?
Cassif directly opposes excluding Abu Shehadeh and calls it a dangerous precedent.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Haaretz"Abu Shehadeh's Failure to Condemn Hamas Is Not Grounds for Disqualification"
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Haaretz's editorial opposed disqualifying Abu Shehadeh for failing to condemn Hamas. It also criticized attempts to exclude Arab parties from the Knesset.
Role at the time: Haaretz editorial board
Before the statement
The editorial appeared while the Supreme Court was considering the disqualification.
After the statement
Its opening criticized Abu Shehadeh's account of the October 7 attack.
Haaretz editorial on the grounds for excluding Abu Shehadeh · HaaretzHeadline; article deck and opening paragraphWhy this label?
Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, the editorial explicitly rejects the stated ground for the ban. Its criticism of his article does not support disqualification.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Nissim Katz "הניסיון להדירו מהזירה הפוליטית הוא שגיאה אסטרטגית"
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Nissim Katz opposed Abu Shehadeh's exclusion, arguing that keeping his views in open political debate was better than pushing his supporters out of parliamentary politics. English translation: The attempt to exclude him from the political arena is a strategic error.
Role at the time: Communications and politics scholar writing in Israel Hayom
Before the statement
Katz described Abu Shehadeh's rhetoric as offensive and said public anger was understandable.
After the statement
He argued that a ban would intensify frustration without removing Abu Shehadeh's views or his constituency.
Nissim Katz argues against excluding Abu ShehadehArticle subtitle; second paragraph; final paragraphWhy this label?
Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh from the election, Katz rejects the ban as a strategic error. His criticism of Abu Shehadeh's rhetoric does not weaken that conclusion.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Sawsan Zaher "This is not present in Sami’s case."
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Sawsan Zaher argued that Abu Shehadeh's case lacked the sustained evidence required to disqualify a candidate for supporting armed struggle.
Role at the time: Palestinian human rights lawyer
Before the statement
Zaher described a requirement for several statements showing that support for armed struggle was central to a candidate's political activity.
After the statement
She argued that Balad should contest the ban instead of withdrawing, because withdrawal would achieve exclusion without a court ruling.
Sawsan Zaher's interview on Abu Shehadeh's exclusionZaher's explanation of the evidentiary threshold in the opening section; her remarks in the withdrawal-dilemma sectionWhy this label?
Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Zaher challenges the evidentiary basis for the ban and urges a legal challenge to it.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Show fewer responses
Sami Abu ShehadehDirectly involved"Upholding this ban would extinguish what little democratic space remains."
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Abu Shehadeh says approving his exclusion would damage democratic participation and argues that the court should assess his case without political pressure.
Role at the time: Balad chairman and former Knesset member contesting his disqualification
Before the statement
The interviewer asks whether support from the Zionist left gave the court political cover to uphold the ban.
After the statement
He argues that treating his article as sufficient while permitting Ben Gvir to run would apply an indefensible standard.
Abu Shehadeh criticizes the campaign to exclude himAnswer to the question about whether support from the Zionist left gave the court political cover.Why this label?
Relative to his exclusion, Abu Shehadeh expressly criticizes the ban and its consequences. His conditional wording describes a threatened outcome, not conditional support.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Adalah - The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel"the disqualification process is tainted by unlawful discrimination and selective enforcement."
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Adalah argues that excluding Abu Shehadeh would rest on insufficient evidence and unequal treatment of Arab and Jewish candidates.
Role at the time: Legal organization representing Sami Abu Shehadeh before the Supreme Court
Before the statement
Adalah cites his broader opposition to violence and says the committee assessed the article in isolation.
After the statement
It compares the treatment of far-right Jewish parties and argues that electoral safeguards should not vary by national identity.
Adalah challenges the evidence for barring Abu ShehadehSection headed Former MK Dr. Sami Abu Shehadeh; paragraph on discrimination and selective enforcement.Why this label?
Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Adalah expressly criticizes the process and its evidentiary basis. Its legal argument rejects the proposed action.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Dahlia Scheindlin"It's hard to choose a single killer argument against banning Sami Abu Shehadeh from running for the Knesset."
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Dahlia Scheindlin opposed excluding Abu Shehadeh. She criticized his description of the attack but pointed to his expression of regret.
Role at the time: Political analyst and Haaretz columnist
Before the statement
The column followed the committee's decision to disqualify Abu Shehadeh.
After the statement
The opening states that there are several arguments against the ban.
Dahlia Scheindlin argues against Abu Shehadeh's exclusion · HaaretzOpening sentence; headline and article deckWhy this label?
Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Scheindlin expressly rejects the ban. Her criticism of his wording does not qualify that conclusion.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Ahmad Tibi"مقصلة للأحزاب العربية"
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Tibi criticizes the exclusions of Abu Shehadeh, Ofer Cassif and the Arab lists as an attack on Arab political representation. English translation: A guillotine for the Arab parties.
Role at the time: Ta'al leader and Knesset member
Before the statement
In a Radio al-Shams interview the day after the committee vote, Tibi discusses the exclusions of Ra'am, the Joint List, Cassif and Abu Shehadeh.
After the statement
He expresses concern about Sohlberg participating in the vote and hopes the Supreme Court will protect the rights to vote and stand for election.
Ahmad Tibi criticizes disqualifications including Abu ShehadehOpening paragraphs and section headed "مقصلة" تطال القوائم.Why this label?
Tibi condemns the disqualifications, expressly including Abu Shehadeh, as an attack on Arab political representation.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Yuval Yoaz "אין בדברים אלה כדי להצדיק פסילה מהתמודדות."
CondemnedCase context: The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
Read more
Yoaz argues that the existing legal standard does not justify barring Abu Shehadeh, despite his criticism of the article. English translation: These statements do not justify disqualification from running.
Role at the time: Lawyer and legal commentator writing in Zman Israel
Before the statement
He says he views the article as supporting a terrorist organization's armed struggle, but argues that the evidence fails the repeated-conduct standard.
After the statement
He also argues that the separate Jewish-and-democratic-state ground does not justify exclusion.
Yuval Yoaz argues the evidence does not justify disqualificationParagraph beginning על היועצת הייתה מוטלת חובה; final clause. Read with the earlier paragraphs on the 2020 Yazbak ruling and the closing discussion of the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground.Why this label?
Relative to excluding Abu Shehadeh, Yoaz expressly rejects the legal justification. His criticism of the article does not qualify his opposition to the ban.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Sources
(32)
Original text
Central Elections Committee decision on Sami Abu Shehadeh's candidacy, application 8/26
Relevant passage: Page 2, paragraphs 6-9; signature dated September 24, 2026.
About this source
The written decision records the September 23 votes: 30-4 on the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground and 31-4 on the armed-struggle ground. It refers the individual-candidate disqualification to the Supreme Court for approval.
- Author
- Central Elections Committee for the 26th Knesset
- Published
- Accessed
Interview
Sawsan Zaher's interview on Abu Shehadeh's exclusion
Relevant passage: Zaher's explanation of the evidentiary threshold in the opening section; her remarks in the withdrawal-dilemma section
About this source
Reporting with directly attributed interview comments by Zaher on the legal threshold and Balad's response.
- Author
- Samah Watad
- Published
- Accessed
Original text
Haaretz editorial on the grounds for excluding Abu Shehadeh
Relevant passage: Headline; article deck and opening paragraph
About this source
Institutional editorial opposing the stated grounds for disqualification.
- Author
- Haaretz Editorial
- Published
- Accessed
Analysis
Dahlia Scheindlin argues against Abu Shehadeh's exclusion
Relevant passage: Opening sentence; headline and article deck
About this source
Signed column rejecting the ban and discussing Abu Shehadeh's expression of regret.
- Author
- Dahlia Scheindlin
- Published
- Accessed
Analysis
Sheldon Kirshner supports the decision to bar Abu Shehadeh
Relevant passage: Second paragraph; following paragraph distinguishes individual disqualification from bans on other lists
About this source
Signed opinion. The author's legal characterization is presented as his argument.
- Author
- Sheldon Kirshner
- Published
- Accessed
Analysis
Ori Wertman argues for upholding candidate disqualifications
Relevant passage: Final paragraph, especially the call not to intervene in the committee decision and the following sentence naming Abu Shehadeh
About this source
Signed opinion reviewing past candidate-disqualification cases and urging the court to leave the 2026 committee decisions in place.
- Author
- Ori Wertman
- Published
- Accessed
Analysis
Nissim Katz argues against excluding Abu Shehadeh
Relevant passage: Article subtitle; second paragraph; final paragraph
About this source
Signed opinion arguing for political contestation of Abu Shehadeh's views and against removing him from the election.
- Author
- Nissim Katz
- Published
- Accessed
Analysis
Orna Yashar on the disqualification of Sami Abu Shehadeh
Relevant passage: Headline, opening commentary, and paragraph after Abu Shehadeh's explanation in the defense section
About this source
Signed Mida commentary endorsing the committee decision and reviewing the arguments at its hearing.
- Author
- Orna Yashar
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Baruch Kra confirms his support for disqualification
About this source
Kra confirms that he supports disqualification while criticizing the proposal for withdrawal without a written judgment.
- Author
- Baruch Kra
- Published
- Accessed
Analysis
Baruch Kra on Sohlberg's vote to disqualify Abu Shehadeh
Relevant passage: Paragraph beginning היועמ"שית בהחלט סיפקה
About this source
Signed opinion column contrasting the legal test for candidate exclusion with Kra's argument for disqualification in this case.
- Author
- Baruch Kra
- Published
- Accessed
Analysis
Ben Caspit opinion on election politics and candidate disqualification
Relevant passage: Section headed כולנו בסירה אחת, second paragraph
About this source
Signed opinion column. Caspit supports Abu Shehadeh's individual disqualification while opposing the bans on Ra'am and the Joint List.
- Author
- Ben Caspit
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Odeh condemns pressure on Abu Shehadeh to withdraw
About this source
The speaker criticizes the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh after the October 1 hearing. His description of a decision is his own characterization.
- Author
- Ayman Odeh
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Cassif condemns the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh
About this source
The speaker criticizes the move to exclude Abu Shehadeh after the October 1 hearing. His description of a decision is his own characterization.
- Author
- Ofer Cassif
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Sohlberg joins vote to disqualify Abu Shehadeh
Relevant passage: Section describing Sohlberg participating in the vote.
About this source
The report quotes Sohlberg explaining why he supported disqualification.
- Author
- Amir Ettinger and Shilo Freid
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Yisrael Beiteinu says it will vote for disqualification
Relevant passage: Party statement quoted in the body.
About this source
Walla independently reports the party announcement at 07:32 on September 23.
- Author
- Avi Solomon
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Yisrael Beiteinu announces support for disqualifying Arab lists and candidates
Relevant passage: Concluding sentence of the party statement naming the Joint List, Raam, Ofer Cassif and Sami Abu Shehadeh.
About this source
N12 quotes the party announcement that its representatives will support disqualification.
- Author
- Amit Segal
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Naama Lazimi supports disqualifying Abu Shehadeh
Relevant passage: Paragraph attributing Lazimi remarks to Army Radio.
About this source
The report independently quotes Lazimi supporting disqualification.
- Author
- Kobi Israel
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Election committee debate and officials reactions, September 23
Relevant passage: Lazimi: 11:11 entry by Amit Segal and Dvir Jabra. Sohlberg: 13:09 entry by Inbar Twyzer and Dvir Jabra.
About this source
The liveblog quotes Lazimi on Army Radio and Sohlberg explaining his committee vote.
- Author
- N12
- Published
- Accessed
Interview
Ahmad Tibi criticizes disqualifications including Abu Shehadeh
Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs and section headed "مقصلة" تطال القوائم.
About this source
Radio al-Shams reports its own telephone interview with Tibi on its First News program. The article explicitly includes Abu Shehadeh and Cassif among the exclusions he criticizes.
- Author
- Nabil Salameh
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Yair Golan supports disqualifying Abu Shehadeh and Ben-Gvir
About this source
Golan supports excluding Abu Shehadeh individually while opposing blanket exclusion of Arab lists.
- Author
- Yair Golan
- Published
- Accessed
Analysis
Yuval Yoaz argues the evidence does not justify disqualification
Relevant passage: Paragraph beginning על היועצת הייתה מוטלת חובה; final clause. Read with the earlier paragraphs on the 2020 Yazbak ruling and the closing discussion of the Jewish-and-democratic-state ground.
About this source
Yoaz's legal commentary rejects disqualification under the existing precedents while sharply criticizing Abu Shehadeh's October 2023 article.
- Author
- Yuval Yoaz
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Balad posts its withdrawal statement and criticism of exclusion
Relevant passage: Caption, second main paragraph, passage about restricting Arab political activity.
About this source
The party account posts the Arabic withdrawal statement previously reproduced by Knooznet.
- Author
- Balad
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Balad's withdrawal announcement after the Supreme Court hearing
Relevant passage: Opening paragraph in the update dated October 1, 2026, 23:56.
About this source
The updated report says Balad announced that Abu Shehadeh would withdraw after the court indicated that a majority favored disqualification.
- Author
- Sarah Ben-Nun
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Report on the attorney general's September 29 submission
Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs and section on disqualification under the Basic Law.
About this source
The Jerusalem Post reports support for exclusion on the armed-struggle ground and opposition to the separate Jewish-and-democratic-state ground.
- Author
- Sarah Ben-Nun
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Baharav-Miara and Aisman ask the court to approve exclusion
Relevant passage: First quoted paragraph of the joint statement, beginning وجاء في بيان مشترك.
About this source
Panet quotes a joint statement attributed to Baharav-Miara and Aisman, distributed by the justice spokesperson's office.
- Author
- Shehadeh Sami Azem
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
Balad announces withdrawal and objects to political exclusion
Relevant passage: Statement paragraph beginning وقال التجمّع; passage about political representation.
About this source
Knooznet reproduces a statement credited to Balad. Its withdrawal announcement was also reported by the Jerusalem Post.
- Author
- Balad, reproduced by Knooznet
- Published
- Accessed
Interview
Abu Shehadeh criticizes the campaign to exclude him
Relevant passage: Answer to the question about whether support from the Zionist left gave the court political cover.
About this source
The New Arab's direct interview, edited for clarity and brevity.
- Author
- Abed Abou Shhadeh and Rabeea Eid
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
Adalah challenges the evidence for barring Abu Shehadeh
Relevant passage: Section headed Former MK Dr. Sami Abu Shehadeh; paragraph on discrimination and selective enforcement.
About this source
Adalah describes its argument on behalf of Abu Shehadeh before the Supreme Court.
- Author
- Adalah
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Ben Gvir supports Abu Shehadeh's disqualification
About this source
Ben Gvir's Hebrew post about representing Otzma Yehudit's request to bar Abu Shehadeh.
- Author
- Itamar Ben-Gvir
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
High Court urges Balad chairman to drop out of elections or face disqualification
Relevant passage: Opening four paragraphs and final paragraph.
About this source
The report describes the justices' indication that a majority favored disqualification and their recommendation that Abu Shehadeh withdraw. It reports a hearing, rather than an operative judgment approving a ban.
- Author
- Ariela Karmel and Times of Israel staff
- Published
- Accessed
Original text
Basic Law: The Knesset, English translation
Relevant passage: Pages 4-5, sections 7a(a)(3) and 7a(b).
About this source
The Knesset's English text describes the armed-struggle ground and the requirement for Supreme Court approval of an individual candidate's disqualification. This translation is marked current through January 24, 2023.
- Author
- Knesset
- Accessed
Original text
Al-Aqsa Flood: preliminary observations
Relevant passage: Opening, third observation and final two paragraphs; Arabic original.
About this source
Abu Shehadeh's article discusses the October 7 attack's military and strategic effects and calls for a political process in its closing paragraphs. The title is translated from Arabic. The parties dispute whether its language supports disqualification.
- Author
- Sami Abu Shehadeh
- Published
- Accessed
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/cases/sami-abu-shehadeh-knesset-disqualification-2026
The Dispute Index. "The effort to disqualify Sami Abu Shehadeh from Israel's 2026 election". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/cases/sami-abu-shehadeh-knesset-disqualification-2026