Did the Interior Department's offshore wind lease-cancellation payments comply with the Judgment Fund Act?

Interior paid TotalEnergies, Invenergy, and Bluepoint Wind more than $2.3 billion to cancel offshore wind leases in 2026. State attorneys general and members of Congress say the payments broke the Judgment Fund Act. Interior says the payments were lawful, voluntary refunds.

Offshore wind turbines rise above heavy seas at the Block Island Wind Farm.
Turbines at the Block Island Wind Farm off Rhode Island, the first offshore wind farm in the United States.

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Doug BurgumU.S. Department of the InteriorTotalEnergiesInvenergyBluepoint Wind

Overview

Beginning in March 2026, the U.S. Department of the Interior announced a series of agreements paying offshore wind developers TotalEnergies, Invenergy, and Bluepoint Wind a combined total of more than $2.3 billion to cancel seven offshore wind leases and redirect the money into oil, gas, and other conventional energy projects. Interior and the Department of Justice have said the payments were reviewed and approved settlements and dollar-for-dollar refunds that no company was forced to accept. Seven state attorneys general sued in June 2026; joined by an eighth, Delaware, and separately by California, they filed four federal lawsuits between June and September 2026 arguing the payments violate the Judgment Fund Act, 31 U.S.C. 1304, because no actual or imminent litigation existed to settle and because compensation for a canceled lease is otherwise available under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. Members of Congress, including Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse and Rep. Deborah Ross, sent separate oversight letters demanding records on the legal basis for the payments. TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne has said the payment returns money the company itself gave the Treasury in 2022, a characterization Interior Secretary Doug Burgum echoed by calling it an "interest-free loan" being repaid.

Read the full background

This case classifies responses to one specific question: whether the payments the Department of the Interior and the Department of Justice made to TotalEnergies, Invenergy, and Bluepoint Wind to cancel their offshore wind leases complied with the Judgment Fund Act, 31 U.S.C. 1304, a permanent appropriation that Congress limited to paying final court judgments and Justice Department compromise settlements of claims that were being litigated or could have been litigated against the United States. The case does not classify responses to the government's broader authority to cancel offshore wind leases, the separate stop-work orders and injunctions covered in other cases, or the general policy dispute over offshore wind. It also does not resolve the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, National Environmental Policy Act, or Administrative Procedure Act claims raised in the same lawsuits; those are distinct legal theories from the Judgment Fund question.

On March 23, 2026 (opens in a new tab), Interior announced it would cancel two TotalEnergies leases, in the New York Bight and Carolina Long Bay, and pay the company's U.S. subsidiary, Attentive Energy, $928 million combined, the amount the company had paid for the leases in 2022. On April 27, 2026 (opens in a new tab), Interior announced the same arrangement with Bluepoint Wind ($765 million, for its New York Bight lease) and Golden State Wind ($120 million, for its Morro Bay, California lease). On June 17, 2026, Interior announced a further agreement with Invenergy to cancel four leases, in the New York Bight, the Gulf of Maine, and off California, for a combined $765 million.

Seven states led by New York's attorney general, Letitia James, sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on June 2, 2026 (opens in a new tab) over the TotalEnergies payment. Delaware later joined the coalition, bringing it to eight states, and they sued again on September 22, 2026 in the Eastern District of New York (opens in a new tab) over the Bluepoint Wind payment and in the District of Maine (opens in a new tab) over the Invenergy payment. California's attorney general, Rob Bonta, separately sued over Invenergy's California lease payment. All four complaints make the same core argument: that the payments were not compromise settlements of actual or imminent litigation, and that compensation for a canceled lease is a type of payment "otherwise provided for" under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, so the Judgment Fund was not legally available.

Interior has said the deals were voluntary agreements, reviewed and approved by the Department of Justice, and that the companies were simply refunded money they had already paid the Treasury. TotalEnergies' chief executive, Patrick Pouyanne, made the same argument to CNBC. Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward said the settlements resolved "protracted litigation."

People in this case

Timeline

19 timeline entries on this page. Dates: March 23, 2026 to October 28, 2026

  1. March 2026

    1. Interior announces $928 million TotalEnergies settlement

      Incident

      The Department of the Interior announced an agreement with TotalEnergies to cancel its New York Bight and Carolina Long Bay offshore wind leases and pay the company's U.S. subsidiary, Attentive Energy, $928 million combined, the amount it had paid for the leases in 2022.

      [01]U.S. Department of the Interior

      Department of the Interior press release announcing the settlement agreement to cancel TotalEnergies' two offshore wind leases and reimburse the company $928 million combined.

  2. April 2026

    1. House Democrats question TotalEnergies settlement's legal basis

      Reaction

      Reps. Jared Huffman and Jamie Raskin, ranking members of the Natural Resources and Judiciary committees, wrote to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and the acting Attorney General calling the TotalEnergies settlement unlawful and demanding its statutory basis.

      [02]Jared Huffman

      Letter from the ranking members of the House Natural Resources and Judiciary committees questioning the legal basis for the TotalEnergies settlement.

    2. Whitehouse opens Senate investigation into TotalEnergies payment

      Reaction

      Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, sent TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne a letter opening an investigation into the settlement, citing GAO and Justice Department precedent on the limits of the Judgment Fund.

      [03]Sheldon Whitehouse

      Letter from the ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee opening an investigation into the TotalEnergies settlement's compliance with the Judgment Fund Act.

    3. Democracy Forward requests final TotalEnergies lease-refund agreements

      Democracy Forward submits a FOIA request to Interior for the final agreements terminating two TotalEnergies leases and reimbursing a combined $928 million. It asks for records from October 15, 2025 through March 23, 2026. The request seeks evidence about the transaction; it does not establish a response or a ruling.

      [04]Democracy Forward requests TotalEnergies lease-refund agreements

      The request seeks final agreements concerning two leases and specified reimbursement amounts. It is a public-records request, not a lawsuit or evidence that responsive records were produced.

      Democracy Forward requests TotalEnergies lease-refund agreementsApril 23 letter to Interior, Records Requested and date scope
    4. Interior announces Bluepoint Wind and Golden State Wind settlements

      Incident

      The Department of the Interior announced agreements to cancel Bluepoint Wind's New York Bight lease for $765 million and Golden State Wind's Morro Bay, California lease for $120 million, following the same model as the TotalEnergies settlement.

      [05]U.S. Department of the Interior

      Department of the Interior press release announcing settlement agreements to cancel Bluepoint Wind's and Golden State Wind's offshore wind leases, with quotes from Secretary Burgum and Associate Attorney General Woodward.

  3. May 2026

    1. California subpoenas Golden State Wind's buyout records

      The California Energy Commission issues a subpoena seeking records of Golden State Wind's offshore-wind lease buyout and its agreement to invest an equal amount in fossil-fuel projects outside California.

      [06]Energy Commission subpoena for Golden State Wind records

      The dated document records the author's testimony or a formal procedural action.

      Energy Commission subpoena for Golden State Wind recordsDated cover letter and subpoena scope, pages 1-4
    2. Treasury reports payments for the TotalEnergies wind settlements

      Source release

      Treasury's report for April 16-30 records about $928 million in principal payments to TotalEnergies Carolina Long Bay and Attentive Energy. It lists the payments under breach-of-contract claims, following the March agreements to give up offshore wind leases.

      [07]Judgment Fund biweekly payment report, April 16-30,2026

      The report groups payments within a two-week period and does not identify an individual payment date. Its principal-payment rows total $928,333,333 for the two leaseholders.

      Judgment Fund biweekly payment report, April 16-30,2026Report creation date and ten BOEM payment rows for TotalEnergies Carolina Long Bay and Attentive Energy
    3. Ahn questions the use of settlement authority for wind buyouts

      Source release

      Brightline Defense's Edward Ahn submits congressional testimony questioning whether the wind agreements resolve genuine legal liabilities or use the Judgment Fund to redirect private investment. He calls for further inquiry into their legal basis and funding.

      [08]Written Testimony of Edward Ahn on the Judgment Fund and offshore wind settlements

      Ahn presents legal and policy criticism in written congressional testimony. His legal conclusions are advocacy, rather than court findings.

    4. 15 House Democrats demand records from Trump administration

      Reaction

      Fifteen House Democrats led by Rep. Deborah Ross sent a letter to President Trump, the Attorney General, and the Interior Department Inspector General demanding records on the offshore wind settlements and asking that further payments be suspended pending review.

      [09]Deborah Ross

      Letter from 15 House Democrats demanding records on the legal basis for the offshore wind settlement payments and asking that further payments be suspended pending review.

  4. June 2026

    1. Seven states sue over the TotalEnergies settlement

      Reaction

      Seven states led by New York filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, arguing the TotalEnergies settlement violated the Judgment Fund Act because it did not resolve actual or imminent litigation and paid for compensation otherwise available under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.

      [10]Letitia James

      Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the TotalEnergies settlement as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act and other federal laws.

    2. Interior announces $765 million Invenergy settlement

      Incident

      The Department of the Interior announced a settlement with Invenergy to cancel four offshore wind leases, in the New York Bight, the Gulf of Maine, and off California, for a combined $765 million, which Invenergy agreed to redirect into natural gas and geothermal projects.

      [11]DOI settlement redirects $765 million from offshore wind to gas, geothermal projects

      World Oil report on Interior's settlement with Invenergy to cancel four offshore wind leases for a combined $765 million.

    3. California gives notice of its planned Golden State Wind lawsuit

      California's attorney general and Energy Commission sent a formal notice of intent to sue over the Golden State Wind cancellation and compensation agreement. The letter alleged failures to follow federal lease-cancellation requirements.

      [12]California's formal lease-cancellation notice

      The dated document records the author's testimony or a formal procedural action.

    4. Interior announces a $129 million wind-lease agreement with Duke

      Interior announces that Duke Energy will give up its Carolina Long Bay wind lease and redirect about $129 million to other generating capacity. Duke says the investments may include nuclear power, natural gas and grid improvements.

      [13]Interior Announces an Energy Agreement to Strengthen American Energy Security and Lower Costs in North Carolina

      The announcement describes a settlement and future reinvestment commitments. It does not document that the promised investments or payment had been completed.

  5. August 2026

    1. Canopy signs a conditional $121 million California lease buyout

      Canopy Offshore Wind's agreement provides for about $121 million from the Judgment Fund after verification of qualifying investments. It covers cancellation of a California wind lease and permits investment in specified fossil-fuel infrastructure and civil nuclear fuel projects.

      [14]Settlement Agreement Between the United States and Canopy Offshore Wind, LLC

      The agreement makes payment conditional on audited qualifying expenditures and provides for cancellation and relinquishment of the lease. It does not itself prove the payment occurred.

      Settlement Agreement Between the United States and Canopy Offshore Wind, LLCOpening agreement date and sections1-4 on eligible expenditures and payment conditions
    2. Sallee argues wind buyouts overpay for weakened development options

      Source release

      Berkeley economist James Sallee publishes an analysis criticizing the cost of the buyouts while doubting they substantially change near-term wind deployment. He argues the Judgment Fund can weaken the negotiating agency's incentive to bargain hard because it does not bear the budget cost. He acknowledges uncertainty over the fund's legal use.

      [15]Sallee criticizes buyout costs while questioning effect on near-term wind deployment

      Sallee's economic analysis criticizes the payments and incentives around the Judgment Fund. He acknowledges legal uncertainty and does not offer a court ruling on eligibility.

      Sallee criticizes buyout costs while questioning effect on near-term wind deploymentThe bizarre part and So who killed offshore wind sections
    3. Padilla and King announce proposal to restore surrendered wind lease areas

      Padilla and King announce legislation that would offer surrendered wind lease areas to adjacent leaseholders, return unclaimed areas for reoffering and pause new offshore oil and gas leasing or permits until those steps occur. The proposal responds to lease buyouts. The bill was introduced August 7; this is its August 11 public announcement, not enactment.

      [16]Padilla and King announce bill to restore surrendered wind lease areas

      The release announces proposed legislation. The bill was introduced August 7; the press release appeared August 11. Neither date establishes enactment.

    4. California sues over the Golden State Wind settlement

      Reaction

      California filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, challenging the Golden State Wind lease buyout as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act, the Antideficiency Act, and other federal laws.

      [17]Rob Bonta

      Federal court complaint filed by California challenging the Golden State Wind lease buyout and its funding from the Judgment Fund.

  6. September 2026

    1. States file three more Judgment Fund lawsuits over Bluepoint Wind and Invenergy

      Reaction

      Eight states filed suit in the Eastern District of New York over the Bluepoint Wind settlement and in the District of Maine over Invenergy's multistate leases, while California separately sued over Invenergy's California lease; the states said the administration had by then committed more than $4 billion in Judgment Fund payments to cancel offshore wind leases.

      [18]Letitia James

      Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the Bluepoint Wind settlement as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act; recites the broader pattern of offshore wind lease buyouts and the more than $4 billion total.

      [19]Letitia James

      Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the Invenergy settlement covering three offshore wind leases as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act.

      [20]Rob Bonta

      Federal court complaint filed by California challenging Invenergy's California lease buyout; also recites the August 28, 2026 California lawsuit over the Golden State Wind buyout and the total Judgment Fund spending across the settlements.

  7. October 2026

    1. Harvard analysis catalogs wind buyouts and challenges to their legal basis

      Source release

      Erika Kranz and Kendall McPherson catalog offshore wind lease buyouts and their investment conditions. Their analysis contrasts Interior's national-security and affordability explanations with states' claims that the agreements exceed settlement and spending authority.

      [21]Kranz and McPherson examine conflicting coal and wind policy rationales

      The authors argue that federal coal and wind policies rely on inconsistent energy and national-security explanations. Their analysis discusses Revolution Wind explicitly.

      Kranz and McPherson examine conflicting coal and wind policy rationalesIntroduction and appendix sections D-E, including Revolution Wind stop-work orders and permit reconsideration
      [22]Harvard EELP publishes its analysis of coal and wind policy rationales

      The publisher dates the Kranz and McPherson paper October 28, 2026.

Claims

Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.

What's disputed

Disputed claim

Letitia James

The settlement payments to offshore wind developers are not lawful compromise settlements of actual or imminent litigation and are a type of payment otherwise provided for by law under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, making them unavailable from the Judgment Fund under 31 U.S.C. 1304.

Sources (2)

Disputed claim

Doug Burgum

The lease buyout payments are a dollar-for-dollar refund of money the companies already paid the Treasury, not new taxpayer spending, because the leases were no longer viable without government-favored terms.

Sources (2)

Response record

Responses

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

1 matching response. Newest first.

  1. Doug BurgumU.S. Secretary of the InteriorDirectly involved

    Before this statement

    Rep. Dave Min asked Burgum whether it was appropriate for Interior to send $1 billion to a foreign energy company to stop producing energy while Americans face high utility bills.

    "They essentially gave the U.S. government an interest-free loan and their money was refunded to them"
    Defended or excused

    Responding to: The lease buyout payments are a dollar-for-dollar refund of money the companies already paid the Treasury, not new taxpayer spending, because the leases were no longer viable without government-favored terms.

    Full statement and sources

    Interior Secretary Doug Burgum told the House Natural Resources Committee that TotalEnergies was simply refunded money it had already paid the government for its offshore wind leases, comparing the arrangement to an interest-free loan.

    After the statement

    Min responded that the cancellation was a case study in what he called an economically illiterate and unlawful energy strategy.

    Why this label?

    Burgum argues the payment was a legitimate refund of the company's own money rather than new taxpayer spending, defending the payment's basis against Rep. Dave Min's questioning.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

Sources

(35)

Original text

State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (E.D.N.Y. No. 1:26-cv-05851)

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: paragraphs 11-20, 450

About this source

Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the Bluepoint Wind settlement as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act; recites the broader pattern of offshore wind lease buyouts and the more than $4 billion total.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Settlement Agreement Between the United States and Canopy Offshore Wind, LLC

Settlement Agreement Between the United States and Canopy Offshore Wind, LLC (opens in a new tab)Opening agreement date and sections1-4 on eligible expenditures and payment conditions
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening agreement date and sections1-4 on eligible expenditures and payment conditions

About this source

The agreement makes payment conditional on audited qualifying expenditures and provides for cancellation and relinquishment of the lease. It does not itself prove the payment occurred.

Author
U.S. Department of the Interior, Department of Justice and Canopy Offshore Wind
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Interior Announces an Energy Agreement to Strengthen American Energy Security and Lower Costs in North Carolina

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Announcement and quoted explanations from Burgum and Duke Energy

About this source

The announcement describes a settlement and future reinvestment commitments. It does not document that the promised investments or payment had been completed.

Author
U.S. Department of the Interior
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Written Testimony of Edward Ahn on the Judgment Fund and offshore wind settlements

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Pages 3-4 and 7-10, legal issues and recommendations

About this source

Ahn presents legal and policy criticism in written congressional testimony. His legal conclusions are advocacy, rather than court findings.

Author
Edward Ahn / Brightline Defense
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Judgment Fund biweekly payment report, April 16-30,2026

Judgment Fund biweekly payment report, April 16-30,2026 (opens in a new tab)Report creation date and ten BOEM payment rows for TotalEnergies Carolina Long Bay and Attentive Energy
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Report creation date and ten BOEM payment rows for TotalEnergies Carolina Long Bay and Attentive Energy

About this source

The report groups payments within a two-week period and does not identify an individual payment date. Its principal-payment rows total $928,333,333 for the two leaseholders.

Author
U.S. Treasury Bureau of the Fiscal Service
Published
Accessed

Analysis

Kranz and McPherson examine conflicting coal and wind policy rationales

Kranz and McPherson examine conflicting coal and wind policy rationales (opens in a new tab)Introduction and appendix sections D-E, including Revolution Wind stop-work orders and permit reconsideration
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Introduction and appendix sections D-E, including Revolution Wind stop-work orders and permit reconsideration

About this source

The authors argue that federal coal and wind policies rely on inconsistent energy and national-security explanations. Their analysis discusses Revolution Wind explicitly.

Author
Erika Kranz and Kendall McPherson
Accessed

Analysis

Harvard EELP publishes its analysis of coal and wind policy rationales

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Dated release, authors and paper summary

About this source

The publisher dates the Kranz and McPherson paper October 28, 2026.

Author
Harvard Environmental and Energy Law Program
Published
Accessed

Analysis

Sallee criticizes buyout costs while questioning effect on near-term wind deployment

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: The bizarre part and So who killed offshore wind sections

About this source

Sallee's economic analysis criticizes the payments and incentives around the Judgment Fund. He acknowledges legal uncertainty and does not offer a court ruling on eligibility.

Author
James Sallee
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Padilla and King announce bill to restore surrendered wind lease areas

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Bill provisions and response to lease buyouts

About this source

The release announces proposed legislation. The bill was introduced August 7; the press release appeared August 11. Neither date establishes enactment.

Author
Office of Senator Alex Padilla
Published
Accessed

Original text

Democracy Forward requests TotalEnergies lease-refund agreements

Democracy Forward requests TotalEnergies lease-refund agreements (opens in a new tab)April 23 letter to Interior, Records Requested and date scope
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: April 23 letter to Interior, Records Requested and date scope

About this source

The request seeks final agreements concerning two leases and specified reimbursement amounts. It is a public-records request, not a lawsuit or evidence that responsive records were produced.

Author
Democracy Forward Foundation
Published
Accessed

Official statement

Oceantic condemns Invenergy wind lease buyout

Oceantic condemns Invenergy wind lease buyout (opens in a new tab)Statement issued by Sam Salustro, SVP of Policy and Market Affairs
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Statement issued by Sam Salustro, SVP of Policy and Market Affairs

About this source

The trade group calls the payment unlawful and criticizes the cancellation's costs. Its legal and economic assessments are attributed claims.

Author
Oceantic Network; Sam Salustro
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Analysis

Rogers argues wind buyouts may violate five federal laws

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Judgment Fund Act section and concluding assessment

About this source

Rogers distinguishes alleged violations and pending challenges from a judicial determination. He argues that statutory limits and the absence of adverse litigation undermine the arrangements.

Author
John Rogers
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Klein and Irish question legal basis for wind lease refunds

Klein and Irish question legal basis for wind lease refunds (opens in a new tab)Direct quotations from Klein and Irish; lease-cancellation and Judgment Fund analysis
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Direct quotations from Klein and Irish; lease-cancellation and Judgment Fund analysis

About this source

This is a congressional republication of POLITICO E&E News reporting. The experts' legal conclusions are their views, not court rulings.

Author
Niina H. Farah, POLITICO E&E News
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Energy Commission subpoena for Golden State Wind records

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Dated cover letter and subpoena scope, pages 1-4

About this source

The dated document records the author's testimony or a formal procedural action.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

California's formal lease-cancellation notice

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Dated letter, pages 1-3

About this source

The dated document records the author's testimony or a formal procedural action.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Analysis

Taxpayers for Common Sense assesses offshore-wind buyouts

Taxpayers for Common Sense assesses offshore-wind buyouts (opens in a new tab)Report section: Uses the Judgment Fund to Finance a Policy Reversal
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Report section: Uses the Judgment Fund to Finance a Policy Reversal

About this source

The author or editorial board presents an assessment of the disputed conduct or proposal.

Author
Taxpayers for Common Sense
Published
Accessed

Analysis

Wentworth's proposal for tighter oversight of the Judgment Fund

Wentworth's proposal for tighter oversight of the Judgment Fund (opens in a new tab)Paragraphs linking current abuse to offshore-wind payouts and proposed reforms
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs linking current abuse to offshore-wind payouts and proposed reforms

About this source

The author or editorial board presents an assessment of the disputed conduct or proposal.

Author
Christie Wentworth
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Clark's announcement of offshore-wind litigation

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Clark's attributed statement

About this source

The issuing person or organization explains its position and the actions it took.

Author
Charity Clark
Published
Accessed

Official statement

Campbell's announcement of wind-buyout litigation

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Campbell's individually attributed statement

About this source

The issuing person or organization explains its position and the actions it took.

Author
Andrea Campbell
Published
Accessed

Official statement

California's challenge to the Golden State Wind agreement

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Bonta statement, August 28 release

About this source

The issuing person or organization explains its position and the actions it took.

Author
Rob Bonta
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Tong's announcement of offshore-wind buyout lawsuits

Tong's announcement of offshore-wind buyout lawsuits (opens in a new tab)Attributed Tong statement and paragraphs on Judgment Fund authority
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Attributed Tong statement and paragraphs on Judgment Fund authority

About this source

The issuing person or organization explains its position and the actions it took.

Author
William Tong
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

State of California v. United States Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (N.D. Cal. No. 3:26-cv-09123)

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: paragraphs 8-11

About this source

Federal court complaint filed by California challenging the Golden State Wind lease buyout and its funding from the Judgment Fund.

Published
Accessed

Reporting

DOI settlement redirects $765 million from offshore wind to gas, geothermal projects

About this source

World Oil report on Interior's settlement with Invenergy to cancel four offshore wind leases for a combined $765 million.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Trump's $1B offshore wind payout to TotalEnergies sparks legal concerns

About this source

Canary Media report on legal questions surrounding the TotalEnergies settlement, including CEO Patrick Pouyanne's CNBC remarks and a former BOEM director's rebuttal.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

During Climate Week, Attorney General Bonta Announces Second Lawsuit Challenging Unlawful Trump Administration Offshore Wind Deal

About this source

California Attorney General's press release announcing the lawsuit over Invenergy's California lease buyout.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

New York, 6 other states sue over the Trump administration's deal to end an offshore wind project

About this source

PBS News report on the first lawsuit over the TotalEnergies settlement, including Interior's response and Secretary Burgum's May 13, 2026 House testimony about the payment.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Attorney General James and Governor Hochul Announce Lawsuit Challenging Trump Administration's Illegal Offshore Wind Deals

About this source

New York Attorney General's press release announcing the lawsuits over the Bluepoint Wind and Invenergy settlement payments.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Letter from Reps. Jared Huffman and Jamie Raskin to Secretary Doug Burgum and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche

About this source

Letter from the ranking members of the House Natural Resources and Judiciary committees questioning the legal basis for the TotalEnergies settlement.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Letter from Rep. Deborah Ross and 14 other House members to President Trump, Attorney General Blanche, and DOI Inspector General Brzymialkiewicz

About this source

Letter from 15 House Democrats demanding records on the legal basis for the offshore wind settlement payments and asking that further payments be suspended pending review.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Letter from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse to TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne

About this source

Letter from the ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee opening an investigation into the TotalEnergies settlement's compliance with the Judgment Fund Act.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

State of California v. United States Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (N.D. Cal. No. 4:26-cv-10778)

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: paragraphs 107-121

About this source

Federal court complaint filed by California challenging Invenergy's California lease buyout; also recites the August 28, 2026 California lawsuit over the Golden State Wind buyout and the total Judgment Fund spending across the settlements.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (D. Maine No. 2:26-cv-00453)

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: paragraphs 1-4, 137-142

About this source

Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the Invenergy settlement covering three offshore wind leases as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act.

Published
Accessed

Original text

State of New York et al. v. United States Department of the Interior et al., Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (D.D.C. No. 1:26-cv-01910)

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: paragraphs 1-20

About this source

Federal court complaint filed by eight states challenging the TotalEnergies settlement as a violation of the Judgment Fund Act and other federal laws.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Interior Announces Two Historic Agreements to Promote Affordable, Reliable Energy Production in the United States

About this source

Department of the Interior press release announcing settlement agreements to cancel Bluepoint Wind's and Golden State Wind's offshore wind leases, with quotes from Secretary Burgum and Associate Attorney General Woodward.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Interior and TotalEnergies Agree to End Offshore Wind Projects, Lowering Costs for American Families

About this source

Department of the Interior press release announcing the settlement agreement to cancel TotalEnergies' two offshore wind leases and reimburse the company $928 million combined.

Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Case updates

Track the state lawsuits over Interior's offshore wind payments

You'll get an email if a court rules in any of the states' lawsuits over the payments, or if Interior, the Justice Department or the companies respond.

5 updates added in the last 14 days.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.

Share or embed this case

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the case page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Did the Interior Department's offshore wind lease-cancellation payments comply with the Judgment Fund Act?
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/cases/did-the-interior-department-s-offshore-wind-lease-cancellation-payments-comply-with-the-judgment-fund-act

The Dispute Index. "Did the Interior Department's offshore wind lease-cancellation payments comply with the Judgment Fund Act?". First published: 2026-09-28. Last updated: 2026-09-28. https://disputeindex.com/cases/did-the-interior-department-s-offshore-wind-lease-cancellation-payments-comply-with-the-judgment-fund-act