Ross says the administration's payments do not "meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund"

Deborah RossU.S. Representative, North Carolina

Condemned

Rep. Deborah Ross, leading a letter from 15 House Democrats to President Trump, the Attorney General, and the Interior Department Inspector General, wrote that the payment structure "does not meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund" because DOI identified no final judgment, approved compromise of a referred claim, or money-damages liability that would make the payments eligible under 31 U.S.C. Section 1304.

“The use of congressionally appropriated funds, potentially in violation of the Antideficiency Act, to pay private companies to cancel clean energy projects on the condition that they invest in fossil fuel ventures appears to be quid pro quo. ... You have furnished these reimbursements through the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Judgment Fund, which was created to pay valid judgement and settlements where the United States is the defendant. The details of these agreements make clear that your payment structure does not meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund: DOI has identified no final judgment, Attorney General-approved compromise of a referred claim, or money-damages liability that would make this payment eligible for the Judgment Fund under 31 U.S.C. § 1304 or 28 U.S.C. § 2414.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Letter from Rep. Deborah Ross and 14 other House members to President Trump, Attorney General Blanche, and DOI Inspector General Brzymialkiewicz · Deborah Ross

Case updates

Track the state lawsuits over Interior's offshore wind payments

You'll get an email if a court rules in any of the states' lawsuits over the payments, or if Interior, the Justice Department or the companies respond.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Offshore wind turbines rise above heavy seas at the Block Island Wind Farm.
Credit: U.S. Department of Energy

Where this statement fits

Did the Interior Department's offshore wind lease-cancellation payments comply with the Judgment Fund Act?

Beginning in March 2026, the U.S. Department of the Interior announced a series of agreements paying offshore wind developers TotalEnergies, Invenergy, and Bluepoint Wind a combined total of more than $2.3 billion to cancel seven offshore wind leases and redirect the money into oil, gas, and other conventional energy projects. Interior and the Department of Justice have said the payments were reviewed and approved settlements and dollar-for-dollar refunds that no company was forced to accept. Seven state attorneys general sued in June 2026; joined by an eighth, Delaware, and separately by California, they filed four federal lawsuits between June and September 2026 arguing the payments violate the Judgment Fund Act, 31 U.S.C. 1304, because no actual or imminent litigation existed to settle and because compensation for a canceled lease is otherwise available under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. Members of Congress, including Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse and Rep. Deborah Ross, sent separate oversight letters demanding records on the legal basis for the payments. TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne has said the payment returns money the company itself gave the Treasury in 2022, a characterization Interior Secretary Doug Burgum echoed by calling it an "interest-free loan" being repaid.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

Letter from Rep. Deborah Ross and 14 other House members to President Trump, Attorney General Blanche, and DOI Inspector General Brzymialkiewicz (opens in a new tab) · Deborah Ross

About this source

Letter from 15 House Democrats demanding records on the legal basis for the offshore wind settlement payments and asking that further payments be suspended pending review.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Ross's letter followed the TotalEnergies and Bluepoint Wind and Golden State Wind settlement announcements and cited the Antideficiency Act alongside the Judgment Fund.

After the quotation

Ross and her co-signers asked the recipients to answer 16 questions about the negotiations by June 1, 2026, including whether the administration obtained a written fiscal-law opinion before entering the agreements.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to whether the payments complied with the Judgment Fund Act, Ross's letter argues directly that they do not meet the statute's requirements, identifying no final judgment or approved compromise that would make them eligible. That is a direct condemnation of the payment mechanism, not merely the broader cancellation policy.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
U.S. Department of the Interior, Doug Burgum

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Deborah Ross, Ross says the administration's payments do not "meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Ross says the administration's payments do not "meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3153-rep-deborah-ross-leading-a-letter-from-15

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Ross says the administration's payments do not "meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund"". First published: 2026-09-28. Last updated: 2026-09-28. https://disputeindex.com/events/3153-rep-deborah-ross-leading-a-letter-from-15