Ross says the administration's payments do not "meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund"
Deborah RossU.S. Representative, North Carolina
Rep. Deborah Ross, leading a letter from 15 House Democrats to President Trump, the Attorney General, and the Interior Department Inspector General, wrote that the payment structure "does not meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund" because DOI identified no final judgment, approved compromise of a referred claim, or money-damages liability that would make the payments eligible under 31 U.S.C. Section 1304.
“The use of congressionally appropriated funds, potentially in violation of the Antideficiency Act, to pay private companies to cancel clean energy projects on the condition that they invest in fossil fuel ventures appears to be quid pro quo. ... You have furnished these reimbursements through the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Judgment Fund, which was created to pay valid judgement and settlements where the United States is the defendant. The details of these agreements make clear that your payment structure does not meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund: DOI has identified no final judgment, Attorney General-approved compromise of a referred claim, or money-damages liability that would make this payment eligible for the Judgment Fund under 31 U.S.C. § 1304 or 28 U.S.C. § 2414.”
Official statement

Where this statement fits
Did the Interior Department's offshore wind lease-cancellation payments comply with the Judgment Fund Act?
Beginning in March 2026, the U.S. Department of the Interior announced a series of agreements paying offshore wind developers TotalEnergies, Invenergy, and Bluepoint Wind a combined total of more than $2.3 billion to cancel seven offshore wind leases and redirect the money into oil, gas, and other conventional energy projects. Interior and the Department of Justice have said the payments were reviewed and approved settlements and dollar-for-dollar refunds that no company was forced to accept. Seven state attorneys general sued in June 2026; joined by an eighth, Delaware, and separately by California, they filed four federal lawsuits between June and September 2026 arguing the payments violate the Judgment Fund Act, 31 U.S.C. 1304, because no actual or imminent litigation existed to settle and because compensation for a canceled lease is otherwise available under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. Members of Congress, including Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse and Rep. Deborah Ross, sent separate oversight letters demanding records on the legal basis for the payments. TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanne has said the payment returns money the company itself gave the Treasury in 2022, a characterization Interior Secretary Doug Burgum echoed by calling it an "interest-free loan" being repaid.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Letter from 15 House Democrats demanding records on the legal basis for the offshore wind settlement payments and asking that further payments be suspended pending review.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Ross's letter followed the TotalEnergies and Bluepoint Wind and Golden State Wind settlement announcements and cited the Antideficiency Act alongside the Judgment Fund.
After the quotation
Ross and her co-signers asked the recipients to answer 16 questions about the negotiations by June 1, 2026, including whether the administration obtained a written fiscal-law opinion before entering the agreements.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to whether the payments complied with the Judgment Fund Act, Ross's letter argues directly that they do not meet the statute's requirements, identifying no final judgment or approved compromise that would make them eligible. That is a direct condemnation of the payment mechanism, not merely the broader cancellation policy.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- U.S. Department of the Interior, Doug Burgum
More from this case
Read the full caseTaxpayer watchdog says the Judgment Fund is not a blank check for policy reversals
Taxpayers for Common Sense
“not to provide a blank check for major executive branch policy decisions.”Read statement
Clark calls the wind payments plainly unlawful
“It is plainly unlawful to use federal funds to pressure companies into foregoing critical renewable energy projects”Read statement
Campbell calls the wind buyouts bad deals for New England
“These are bad deals for New Englanders and represent yet another illegal move by the Trump Administration that harms our communities.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Ross says the administration's payments do not "meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund"
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3153-rep-deborah-ross-leading-a-letter-from-15
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Ross says the administration's payments do not "meet the statutory requirements governing use of the Judgment Fund"". First published: 2026-09-28. Last updated: 2026-09-28. https://disputeindex.com/events/3153-rep-deborah-ross-leading-a-letter-from-15