Steve Scalise

Portrait of Steve Scalise
U.S. Congress (Lisa Nipp for the Office of Congressman Steve Scalise)

Steve Scalise is a U.S. representative from Louisiana and the House majority leader.

What we have documented

We have documented 4 statements by Steve Scalise, in 3 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Steve Scalise

Portrait of Steve Scalise

Steve Scalise

Role at the time: House Majority Leader (R-La.), interviewed on ABC’s This Week

Challenged the characterization

Statement summary

Asked by ABC’s Jonathan Karl whether he supports Trump banning CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House and whether it violates the First Amendment, Scalise said he does not think there has been a president “more open to the press,” said “I don’t know why he did it. I don’t know what the background is,” and described Trump as taking questions from everyone. He did not say whether he supports the ban or whether it violates the First Amendment.

“first of all, I don't think we've had a president that's been more open to the press. … He’s a very open president. … Well, I don't know why he did it. I don't know what the background is. Look, when we have our press -- press conferences every week, the speaker, myself, our leadership team, we take questions from everybody. CNN's there, all of them. But the president takes those questions. I've never seen him turn a question down from anybody.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)ABC This Week, Sept. 20, 2026: interview with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise · ABC NewsScalise interview, opening exchange with Jonathan Karl on the press ban
Why we used this label

On Trump’s decision to exclude CNN, MS NOW and Politico from White House access because of their coverage, Scalise neither endorses nor rejects the ban. Asked twice whether he supports it and whether it violates the First Amendment, he answers with an assertion that Trump is unusually open to the press and says he does not know why the ban was imposed, which disputes the premise that the ban reflects hostility to the press without taking a substantive position on the ban itself. The closest competing labels are “Explicitly stayed out”, which loses because he makes an affirmative argument rather than only refusing to answer, and “Defended or excused”, which loses because he expressly says he does not know why Trump acted and never says the ban is justified.

Portrait of Steve Scalise

Steve Scalise

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Louisiana 1st district

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Steve Scalise voted Nay on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A nay vote opposed the resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, allowing U.S. military operations in the war to continue.

Portrait of Steve Scalise

Steve Scalise

Role at the time: U.S. representative from Louisiana and House majority leader

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Bloomberg reported that Steve Scalise said Republicans would seek to continue delivering measures like the proposed payments if they retained control of Congress, while saying lawmakers would need to make the numbers work and settle the details.

“[We would] keep delivering more things like” the proposed payments if Republicans retain control of Congress, and “make the numbers work to get the details right.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Bloomberg reporting on congressional responses to Trump’s $5,000 proposalParagraphs quoting Thune, Smith, Burgum, Scalise, Cruz and Norman.
Why we used this label

Scalise described a conditional future course tied to Republican control and unresolved fiscal details, rather than an unconditional commitment.

Portrait of Steve Scalise

Steve Scalise

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Louisiana at the statement date.

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Scalise defends Trump’s military action as necessary to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran and says the operation is succeeding.

“Epic Fury has been successful in achieving its objectives.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Scalise defends the operation as achieving its objectivesOfficial March 29 ABC This Week interview excerpts; complete ABC News transcript independently read in browser, including questions on ground troops and congressional oversight
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Scalise defends Trump’s military action as necessary to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran and says the operation is succeeding.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage