Scalise supports a conditional path for proposed payments
U.S. representative from Louisiana and House majority leader
“[We would] keep delivering more things like” the proposed payments if Republicans retain control of Congress, and “make the numbers work to get the details right.”
The full case
Trump’s $5,000 election pledge: policy dividend or vote-buying?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
Source and context
Reporting
Bloomberg reporting on congressional responses to Trump’s $5,000 proposal (opens in a new tab)Reported quotations from Senate and House Republicans (web lines 141–178).
About this source
Public reporting republished by BusinessMirror with a Bloomberg News byline. The quotations are attributed to the named speakers; the report describes reactions and conditions.
Before the quotation
The September 13 report attributed the remarks to Scalise in a CBS News interview.
After the quotation
The report does not identify a bill, funding source, or enacted program. September 13 is the report’s publication day; it does not establish the exact time of Scalise’s interview.
How this statement is classified
Scalise described a conditional future course tied to Republican control and unresolved fiscal details, rather than an unconditional commitment.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full case“The 5,000’s going to happen, 100%.”Read statement
“I would assume, yes, he’d need Congress to act, and that’s a creative idea.” … “He’s the big ideas president. We’re going to try to implement everything we can. I commit that Congress will work through it and find consensus on that like they have to do everything else.”Read statement
“It’s doable,” but “legislation doesn’t pass just like that.”Read statement