Ray Schroeder

Ray Schroeder is an education technology scholar, a senior fellow at UPCEA and professor emeritus at the University of Illinois Springfield. He helped establish the university's online learning program and writes about online education, professional learning and emerging technologies.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Ray Schroeder on Artificial Intelligence, Education, and Privacy. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Ray Schroeder

Ray Schroeder

Role at the time: Education technology scholar and Inside Higher Ed columnist

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Schroeder argues that rapid AI development needs rigorous testing and ethical constraints before use outside controlled environments. He identifies Anthropic among the competing frontier companies. He supports AI's potential while warning that speed can undermine review and alignment.

“those rules must be thoroughly tested in the lab before the algorithm is allowed to be applied outside rigorously constrained test environments.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Ray Schroeder argues for rigorous safeguards on self-improving AISigned September 30 Inside Higher Ed opinion column
Why we used this label

Schroeder supports AI development conditionally on strong constraints and testing before deployment.

Ray Schroeder

Role at the time: Ray Schroeder, education technology scholar

Condemned

Statement summary

Schroeder argues that extended school AI moratoria sacrifice useful tutoring and adaptive-learning tools. He says home use on personal computers requires additional family funding, initiative and persistence.

“To call a moratorium on the use of AI in schools for the next one to three years will result in significant losses”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Ray Schroeder argues against extended school AI moratoriaSigned September 16 opinion column
Why we used this label

Schroeder condemns extended school AI pauses, arguing that they harm learning and access.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.