Mark Harris

Portrait of Mark Harris
Ike Hayman / House Creative ServicesSourcePublic domain (U.S. federal government)Existing portrait crop retained; resized only.

United States Representative and Republican candidate for U.S. House in North Carolina's 8th district.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Statements by Mark Harris

Portrait of Mark Harris

Mark Harris

Role at the time: United States Representative, North Carolina's 8th district

Defended or excused

Statement summary

In a PBS North Carolina interview, Rep. Mark Harris echoed the president's framing of the war as a detour that had to be taken to assure Iran would not have a nuclear weapon, saying that is it, period.

“the president has described it as a detour that we weren't necessarily looking to do, but it was a detour that had to be taken in order to assure that Iran was not going to have a nuclear weapon. I mean, that's just I mean, that's it. Period. They're not going to have a nuclear weapon full stop”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Mark Harris, Republican candidate for NC's 8th congressional district
Why we used this label

Harris endorsed the war as necessary to stop an Iranian nuclear weapon, a defense of the war.

Portrait of Mark Harris

Mark Harris

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, North Carolina 8th district

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Mark Harris voted Nay on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A nay vote opposed the resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, allowing U.S. military operations in the war to continue.

Portrait of Mark Harris

Mark Harris

Role at the time: U.S. representative from North Carolina

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Mark Harris cosponsored the Flock-Off Act, H.R. 10221, which would bar federal funds for covered camera systems, including plate readers, subject to exceptions.

“no Federal funds may be obligated or expended, directly or indirectly, by the head of any Government agency or by any recipient or subrecipient of Federal funds (including any State, local, or Tribal government)”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Flock-Off Act, H.R. 10221, introduced textIntroducers and Section 2 federal funding prohibition
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Harris cosponsored a bill that would cut off federal money for covered camera systems, with border and toll exceptions. A funding bar rather than a ban on every use fits Mixed or conditional.

Portrait of Mark Harris

Mark Harris

Role at the time: U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th district.

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Harris criticized Flock-style mass surveillance while supporting police access to crime-fighting tools. He favored state and local action and said Congress may need to intervene when surveillance violates Fourth Amendment rights.

“these mass surveillance tools are not something that as Americans that we want to get used to.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Harris discusses Flock surveillance on NewsmaxNational Report interview quotations, published September 1 at 12:56 p.m. EDT
Why we used this label

Harris accepts police technology subject to constitutional limits and criticizes mass surveillance. He expresses a conditional approach to continued use rather than a categorical ban.

Portrait of Mark Harris

Mark Harris

Role at the time: U.S. representative

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Mark Harris signed a letter urging nationwide NFA non-enforcement to avoid unequal treatment and requesting that DOJ decline an appeal and begin rulemaking.

“Action: Signed an August 11 letter urging DOJ to apply the NFA ruling nationwide, decline an appeal and begin rulemaking.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Forty-seven members of Congress urge nationwide NFA non-enforcementPages 1-2, policy request; pages 3-8, all 47 signatures
Why we used this label

The reference is nationwide NFA non-enforcement. Signing a letter expressly requesting that policy supports it, even though the letter predates ATF's October announcement.

Topics in this coverage