The Dispute Index

Kevin Cramer

Portrait of Kevin Cramer
Rebecca Hammel / U.S. Senate Photographic StudioSourcePublic domain (U.S. federal government)Existing portrait crop retained; resized only.

United States Senator (Republican) from North Dakota.

X (Twitter) (opens in a new tab)Instagram (opens in a new tab)Facebook (opens in a new tab)

What we have documented

We have documented 5 statements by Kevin Cramer, in 3 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Kevin Cramer

Portrait of Kevin Cramer

Kevin Cramer

Role at the time: Republican senator from North Dakota and member of the Senate Banking Committee, speaking to CNBC

Condemned

Response to this claim

U.S. intelligence officials believe Alice Huang, a Megaspeed executive with a close relationship to Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang, was working for China's Ministry of State Security, making him the target of a Chinese intelligence effort.

“This is a guy that's right now so vulnerable to extortion, blackmail. I just don't think, as a national security matter, we can run the risk.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Jensen Huang affair in D.C.: Resignation calls and moves to tighten Nvidia China exports · CNBCFull article
Why we used this label

The reference point is the reported relationship between Jensen Huang and Megaspeed executive Alice Huang, whom U.S. intelligence officials reportedly believe was working for Chinese intelligence, and whether it put U.S. or Nvidia secrets at risk. Cramer says the relationship leaves Huang open to extortion and blackmail and that he should resign, which condemns Huang's conduct as a national security risk.

Read statementFull case: Nvidia's board investigates reports that CEO Jensen Huang was the target of a Chinese intelligence effort; Huang admits an affair and China calls the spy allegation a smear
Portrait of Kevin Cramer

Kevin Cramer

Role at the time: U.S. senator from North Dakota

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Sen. Kevin Cramer tells Face the Nation that capitulating to a bully invites more demands and that he shares the positions of Republican colleagues who criticized the waiver. He adds that diesel prices are an important election issue and says he expects the waiver to be a short-term pause.

“I think capitulating to a bully generally means you're going to make more demands going forward. That's the problem with, you know, taking sort of a business negotiation approach to the - to negotiating with a thug, which is what Vladimir Putin is. So, I share those colleagues' positions on it. However, I also have to, you know, acknowledge that we are a few weeks or a couple of weeks from an election. One of the important topics of the election is the cost of diesel fuel.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Full transcript of "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Oct. 18, 2026 · CBS News
Why we used this label

The reference point is Trump's waiver of the Graham Act's Russia sanctions. Cramer agrees with colleagues who criticized it and says he still wants the law fully enforced, but he cites diesel costs before the election and expects only a short pause, which partly excuses the timing. We used the mixed or conditional label.

Read statementFull case: Trump waives the Graham Act's Russia sanctions
Portrait of Kevin Cramer

Kevin Cramer

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, North Dakota

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Kevin Cramer voted nay on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)
Why we used this label

Voted against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to let U.S. involvement continue without congressional authorization.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?
Portrait of Kevin Cramer

Kevin Cramer

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, North Dakota

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Kevin Cramer voted Nay on H.Con.Res. 86, the Senate resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 184: H.Con.Res. 86, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 50-48)
Why we used this label

A nay vote opposed the resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, allowing U.S. military operations in the war to continue.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?
Portrait of Kevin Cramer

Kevin Cramer

Role at the time: U.S. Senator for North Dakota at the statement date.

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Cramer defends the military operation as necessary after Iran refused nuclear negotiations and praises Trump’s decision to act.

“This action has been a long time coming. This is a necessary action.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Cramer defends the military operation as necessary after Iran refused nuclear negotiations and praises Trump’s decision to act.Complete issued statement verified on official website.
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Cramer defends the military operation as necessary after Iran refused nuclear negotiations and praises Trump’s decision to act.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Trump waives the Graham Act's Russia sanctions

Relationship to this case: Speaker

The White House says waiving the Graham Act's Russia measures preserves room for peace negotiations. Lawmakers from both parties and Volodymyr Zelenskyy say relief weakens pressure on Russia. Thomas Massie welcomes Trump's use of the authority Congress granted.

RussiaInternational RelationsUpdated

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage