Kate Starbird

Portrait of Kate Starbird
Patrick Farrell / Knight FoundationSourceCC BY-SA 2.0Existing Commons portrait crop retained; resized only.

Kate Starbird is a professor in the Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering at the University of Washington. She is a co-founder and former faculty director of the UW Center for an Informed Public, which studies misinformation and online information ecosystems. Her research examines how online rumors and disinformation spread during crises, elections and breaking news events. She was named a fellow of the Association for Computing Machinery and has received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers. Before her academic career, she played professional basketball in the United States and Europe.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Kate Starbird on 2026 Midterm Elections, Federalism, and U.S. Politics, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Kate Starbird

Portrait of Kate Starbird

Kate Starbird

Role at the time: Professor at the University of Washington and co-founder of its Center for an Informed Public, posting on her personal Bluesky account

Condemned

Statement summary

Disinformation researcher Kate Starbird says the administration's efforts on mail-in voting sowed doubt and confusion among voters, while many voters are responding by voting early, using drop boxes and tracking their ballots.

“The bad news: The Trump admin's efforts to interfere w/ mail-in-voting were successful in sowing doubt & confusion. The good news: That's not stopping voters who are getting the message to vote early, use official ballot dropboxes, & track their ballots.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Kate Starbird on voter confusion about mail-in votingOriginal post
Why we used this label

Starbird calls the administration's moves interference that sowed doubt and confusion, a negative judgment of the effort to impose the mail-ballot rules. The closest competing label is mixed or conditional, because she also says voters are adapting; it loses because that observation does not qualify her judgment of the effort.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.