The Dispute Index

John Curtis

Portrait of John Curtis
U.S. Senate Photo Studio / U.S. Congress

John Curtis is a Republican U.S. senator for Utah, serving since January 2025. He previously represented Utah's 3rd Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives and was mayor of Provo.

U.S. Senator (2025 to present)Website (opens in a new tab)
X (Twitter) (opens in a new tab)Instagram (opens in a new tab)Facebook (opens in a new tab)

What we have documented

We have documented 8 statements by John Curtis, in 3 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by John Curtis

Portrait of John Curtis

John Curtis

Role at the time: U.S. Senator from Utah, in a written statement

Condemned

Statement summary

Sen. John Curtis said in a written statement that the decision not to livestream the execution was right for the victims' loved ones and for the country.

“This is the right move, both for the loved ones of the victims and for the country”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Curtis applauds decision not to livestream execution of Fort Hood shooterCurtis's written statement quoted in the opening paragraphs
Why we used this label

The case asks whether Pete Hegseth should livestream Nidal Hasan's execution. Curtis welcomes the decision to drop the broadcast, which he had earlier said risked feeding an appetite for executions as entertainment. That opposes the broadcast, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because he endorses no part of the livestream plan.

Read statementFull case: Should Pete Hegseth livestream Nidal Hasan's execution?
Portrait of John Curtis

John Curtis

Role at the time: U.S. Senator from Utah, in a post on X

Condemned

Statement summary

Sen. John Curtis said Hegseth's plan to livestream the Fort Hood execution risks feeding an appetite for executions as entertainment, that broadcasting a death diminishes the country and is not an effective deterrent, and urged him to reconsider.

“Secretary Hegseth’s plan to livestream the Fort Hood execution risks feeding that appetite. The victims deserve justice administered with solemnity. Broadcasting a death diminishes us and is not an effective deterrent. I urge him to reconsider.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)John Curtis's post on the plan to livestream Nidal Hasan's execution (X post) · John CurtisFull post, Oct. 9, 2026, 12:16 p.m. EDT.
Why we used this label

The case asks whether Pete Hegseth should livestream Nidal Hasan's execution; it concerns the broadcast proposal, not Hasan's conviction or capital punishment. Curtis says the plan "risks feeding that appetite" for executions as entertainment and urges Hegseth to reconsider. That opposes the broadcast, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because he says the victims deserve justice without endorsing any part of the broadcast.

Read statementFull case: Should Pete Hegseth livestream Nidal Hasan's execution?
Portrait of John Curtis

John Curtis

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Utah

Defended or excused

Statement summary

John Curtis voted nay on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)
Why we used this label

Voted against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to let U.S. involvement continue without congressional authorization.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?
Portrait of John Curtis

John Curtis

Role at the time: U.S. Senator for Utah, in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee and on X

Condemned

Response to this claim

The Kremlev-funded celebration, alongside Donald Trump Jr.'s business ties to foreign figures, raises legitimate questions about foreign access to a sitting president's family and possible expectations of a returned favor that could create national security vulnerabilities, warranting a congressional investigation and subpoenas of both Trump Jr. and Hunter Biden.

“A toaster is a wedding gift. A private-island party paid for by a Putin-connected oligarch is something else. Republicans nearly wore out the subpoena machine investigating Hunter Biden's foreign relationships. We should not unplug it now. The country should not have to accept one standard for the family of a Republican president and another for the family of a Democratic president. Nor should congressional oversight begin and end when control of the White House changes hands.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)GOP senator asks Senate Judiciary Committee to subpoena Donald Trump Jr., Hunter Biden (CBS News) · CBS NewsFull article, quoting Curtis's X post and his letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee
Why we used this label

Curtis directly characterizes the arrangement as corruption ("which to me just stinks. It's corruption, I don't like it.") and formally requests a congressional subpoena and investigation, a clear denunciation of the episode and a call for accountability.

Read statementFull case: Should the Senate Judiciary Committee Subpoena Donald Trump Jr. Over His Kremlev-Funded Wedding Celebration?
Portrait of John Curtis

John Curtis

Role at the time: U.S. Senator for Utah at the statement date.

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Curtis supports preventing Iranian nuclear weapons but criticizes proceeding without Congress and demands congressionally defined war terms, rejecting an immediate halt to all activities.

“But I can insist that Congress step up and define the terms of the war”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)John Curtis on the Iran warComplete original release or interview report; date-only timestamp represented at noon UTC
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Curtis supports preventing Iranian nuclear weapons but criticizes proceeding without Congress and demands congressionally defined war terms, rejecting an immediate halt to all activities.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?
Portrait of John Curtis

John Curtis

Role at the time: U.S. Senator, Utah

Defended or excused

Statement summary

John Curtis voted Nay on H.Con.Res. 86, the Senate resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 184: H.Con.Res. 86, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 50-48)
Why we used this label

A nay vote opposed the resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, allowing U.S. military operations in the war to continue.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?
Portrait of John Curtis

John Curtis

Role at the time: U.S. Senator for Utah at the statement date.

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Curtis defends the initial operation’s authority but refuses continued funding without congressional involvement after the war powers deadline.

“I will not support continued funding for the use of force without Congress weighing in.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)John Curtis on the Iran warComplete original attached written statement image, manually read and transcribed; April 30, 2026, 2:02 PM displayed; date-only timestamp represented at noon UTC
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Curtis defends the initial operation’s authority but refuses continued funding without congressional involvement after the war powers deadline.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?
Portrait of John Curtis

John Curtis

Role at the time: U.S. Senator for Utah at the statement date.

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Curtis endorses the strikes as targeted action protecting Americans, allies and regional stability.

“Our Commander-in-Chief is taking planned, targeted action to protect the American people,”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)John Curtis on the Iran warComplete original release or interview report; date-only timestamp represented at noon UTC
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Curtis endorses the strikes as targeted action protecting Americans, allies and regional stability.

Read statementFull case: Do they support the war in Iran?

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage