George Whitesides

Portrait of George Whitesides
Ike Hayman, House Creative Services

United States Representative and Democratic candidate for U.S. House in California's 27th district.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Statements by George Whitesides

Portrait of George Whitesides

George Whitesides

Role at the time: U.S. representative from California

Condemned

Statement summary

George Whitesides joins a letter alleging that the Trump ads misuse public funds and requesting GAO and OSC investigations.

“These ads constitute an illegal use of taxpayer funds”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Raskin and Whitesides request investigations of taxpayer-funded Trump adsPages 1-3: legal allegations; page 4: investigation requests and signatures
Why we used this label

The co-signed letter condemns public payment for the ads and seeks accountability.

Portrait of George Whitesides

George Whitesides

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, California 27th district

Condemned

Statement summary

George Whitesides voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of George Whitesides

George Whitesides

Role at the time: United States Representative and Democratic candidate for U.S. House in California's 27th district.

Condemned

Statement summary

Whitesides criticizes the unilateral military action as unconstitutional and urges Congress to return and vote on war powers.

“taking major unilateral military action without congressional authorization is unconstitutional, full stop.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)US attack on Iran needed congressional approval, Southern California Democratic lawmakers sayComplete original text; Whitesides condemns unauthorized Iran military action
Why we used this label

The case concerns U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war. Whitesides criticizes the unilateral military action as unconstitutional and urges Congress to return and vote on war powers.

Topics in this coverage