Emanuel Cleaver

Portrait of Emanuel Cleaver
Franmarie Metzler / US House Office of Photography

United States Representative and Democratic candidate for U.S. House in Missouri's 5th district.

Democratic candidate for U.S. House in Missouri's 5th Congressional District (2026)

What we have documented

We have documented 5 statements by Emanuel Cleaver, in 3 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Missouri's map fight after the Supreme Court order

We'll email you if anyone seeks further Supreme Court review, when Missouri voters decide Proposition A, or if state officials respond to the order.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Emanuel Cleaver

Portrait of Emanuel Cleaver

Emanuel Cleaver

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Missouri's 5th District, posting on his official @repcleaver account

Condemned

Statement summary

Cleaver said state officials had spent more than a year on an effort to "silence the voices of Missouri voters and steal a congressional seat". He said that after more than 305,000 Missourians demanded a say, the Supreme Court had put what he called a "shameful and unlawful scheme" to rest.

“For more than a year, state officials have spent precious time, energy, and resources on an effort to silence the voices of Missouri voters and steal a congressional seat. Tonight, after more than 305,000 Missourians demanded a say, the Supreme Court has put this shameful and unlawful scheme to rest. Power to the people.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Emanuel Cleaver on X: the Supreme Court has put this scheme to rest · Emanuel CleaverFull X post, published September 25, 2026 at 23:53 UTC (6:53 p.m. CDT), quoting an Associated Press post
Why we used this label

The reference point is use of the 2025 map in the 2026 general election. Cleaver welcomes the Supreme Court's order and describes the effort to use the map as an unlawful scheme to silence voters, which condemns that use. The closest competing label, “Mixed or conditional”, loses because he attaches no condition.

Portrait of Emanuel Cleaver

Emanuel Cleaver

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Missouri 5th district

Condemned

Statement summary

Emanuel Cleaver voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of Emanuel Cleaver

Emanuel Cleaver

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Missouri's 5th District, posting on his official @repcleaver account

Condemned

Response to this claim

Under the Missouri Constitution, the referendum petition kept House Bill 1 from taking effect, so the 2022 map is the only valid congressional map and must be used in the 2026 general election.

“A win for justice. A win for democracy. A win for the people of Missouri. It is my hope that state officials will start following court orders and end this shameful attempt to break Missouri law and silence Missouri voters.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Emanuel Cleaver on X: a win for justice, a win for democracy · Emanuel CleaverFull X post, published 2026-09-10 17:03 UTC (12:03 p.m. CDT), quoting an NBC News report on the Supreme Court's stay
Why we used this label

The reference point is use of the 2025 map in the 2026 general election. Cleaver welcomes the stay that keeps the 2025 map out of the general election and criticizes the effort to use it as a breach of Missouri law, which condemns that use. The closest competing label, “Mixed or conditional”, loses because he attaches no condition.

Portrait of Emanuel Cleaver

Emanuel Cleaver

Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Missouri at the statement date.

Condemned

Statement summary

Cleaver criticizes the Iran conflict as a presidential war of choice with fatal human costs.

“Their sacrifice painfully underscores the real cost of the President’s war of choice.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Cleaver criticizes the Iran conflict as a presidential war of choice with fatal human costs.Complete original authored X post verified directly; date displayed on the post, date-only timestamp represented at noon UTC. Quoted caption is not a video transcript.
Why we used this label

Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Cleaver criticizes the Iran conflict as a presidential war of choice with fatal human costs.

Portrait of Emanuel Cleaver

Emanuel Cleaver

Role at the time: U.S. representative for Missouri's 5th District, requesting FY2026 funding.

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Emanuel Cleaver requested $10 million for Lee's Summit public-safety technology, including a real-time crime center that would combine plate readers with other surveillance and live data feeds. His signed letter describes the center as a tool for investigations and rapid suspect identification. The request covers the broader project and does not identify a plate-reader vendor.

“license plate readers (LPRs), and other real-time technologies to support law enforcement response, investigations, and strategic deployment of resources.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Cleaver supports plate-reader integration in regional crime center in signed funding request · Emanuel CleaverSigned April 28, 2025 letter, page 1, Real-Time Crime Center paragraph
Why we used this label

Relative to networked plate surveillance, Cleaver expressly supports integrating plate readers into a centralized crime-analysis hub and gives an investigative rationale. This establishes support for the specific regional project, rather than inferring reader support from a generic police grant.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage