What did Trump mean when he said 'Let them take out Los Angeles' at a Nebraska rally?

Trump told a Nebraska rally "Let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego." California officials say he called attacks on the cities a small price for the Iran war; the White House says he meant a nuclear Iran's threat.

Claim in dispute

Trump was clearly stating that U.S. cities would have been threatened if a nuclear Iran had not been stopped, and the media reaction to his comments is not rooted in reality.

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Overview

Our labels in this case measure each response against one disputed claim: that President Donald Trump's remark meant attacks by Iran on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as his critics read it. A response that asserts or endorses that reading is recorded as Condemned. A response that rejects that reading and offers another, including the White House explanation that Trump meant the war is stopping a nuclear-armed Iran from ever being able to attack the two cities, is recorded as Challenged the characterization. A response arguing that an attack on the cities would be acceptable would be recorded as Defended or excused; we have not found one as of October 6, 2026. A label records a speaker's stated position, not our finding on what Trump meant.

Trump held a midterm campaign rally at the Pinnacle Bank Expo Center in Grand Island, Nebraska, on the evening of October 5, 2026. Right Side Broadcasting Network's video of the speech (opens in a new tab) runs about 82 minutes. About 12 minutes in, he said, in our transcription: "And again, remember, with the war, it's just artificial. It's a little bit high. It's a small price to pay for keeping the world safe, keeping our country safe. They can take out a city. Let them take, let it, let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego. That's, this is a very small price to pay, and it's going to be over with very soon" (video at 12:20 (opens in a new tab)). The crowd cheered.

The passage does not mention nuclear weapons. In the two minutes before it, Trump talked about the midterm elections: the line of supporters outside the hall, his request that the crowd "pretend I'm on the ballot," his warning that tax cuts "could all be taken away if you start losing a couple of little elections," early voting, a line he attributed to former Vice President Kamala Harris, and his wish to "see a tremendous victory because it verifies all the things we did" (from 10:10 (opens in a new tab)). The word "it" in "it's just artificial" is not defined in the passage; earlier in the speech Trump had tied the war to oil and gas prices.

That earlier passage came about six to seven minutes before the remark, which begins at 12:25. Trump said the war with Iran would end soon and that "your prices are going to come tumbling," and added: "We're saving the world from what could be one of the worst tragedies ever. We're not going to let them have it, and they won't have it. That's decided. They will not have a nuclear weapon" (at 5:00 (opens in a new tab)). At 6:15 he said "We have to stop them from having a nuclear weapon" (video (opens in a new tab)) and then described passing an Iowa gas station selling gasoline at $1.95 a gallon. In the minute after the remark, he said the war was "essentially almost over with," that "they always say they have a big threshold for pain," and that the war would "end one way or the other," then mentioned gasoline and moved on to Venezuela and oil. He did not mention Los Angeles or San Diego again. About 13 minutes later, again discussing gasoline prices, he said, "And again, remember this. I stopped them from ever having," and then, "How about those B-2 bombers?" He did not name Iran or nuclear weapons in that passage (video at 25:11 (opens in a new tab)).

Published versions of the quotation differ. In the recording, Trump restarts twice before "Los Angeles" and says "That's, this is" before "a very small price to pay." CBS News Los Angeles (opens in a new tab) printed both restarts, "Let them take, let it, let them take out Los Angeles," and Agence France-Presse (opens in a new tab) printed one; CNN (opens in a new tab), NBC News (opens in a new tab) and ABC News (opens in a new tab) printed "Let them take out Los Angeles" once, and some outlets printed "Let 'em." The restarts do not change the words that follow. ABC News and CBS News Los Angeles described the remark as being about Iran developing a nuclear weapon, while The National News Desk (opens in a new tab) noted that Trump did not mention nuclear weapons in it. CBS News Los Angeles said it was not immediately clear what Trump meant, and the Los Angeles Times (opens in a new tab) said the comment was possibly in jest.

California Democrats responded within hours. Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote (opens in a new tab) that Trump "is now saying our foreign enemies should 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego" and called him "deranged and dangerous." His press office later wrote (opens in a new tab) that the president was "advocating for an attack" on more than 10 million residents, and after that his governor's account called (opens in a new tab) the remark "Disgusting and disqualifying." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass wrote (opens in a new tab) that the president "suggested that a foreign government attack Los Angeles," and in a separate post (opens in a new tab) on another of her accounts wrote, "Keep LA out of your damn mouth." San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria wrote (opens in a new tab) that his city "is not collateral damage." Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff, Reps. Sara Jacobs and Scott Peters, the gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra and the Democratic National Committee also criticized the remark.

Jim Desmond, a Republican San Diego County supervisor running in California's 48th Congressional District, wrote (opens in a new tab) that he "vehemently" disagreed with the president's comments and that he had "served to protect Americans, not write off American cities as an acceptable price of war." His Democratic opponent, Marni von Wilpert, criticized both Trump and Desmond. Rep. Kevin Kiley, a former Republican running for reelection as an independent, told FOX40 (opens in a new tab) that there is "no evidence" Iran could strike a California city and that "such rhetoric is unhelpful." FOX40 reported that the California Republican Party declined to comment.

On the morning of October 6, White House Communications Director Steven Cheung wrote (opens in a new tab) that the "media freakout" over the comments was "not rooted in reality" and that Trump "was clearly stating U.S. cities would have been threatened if a nuclear Iran hadn't been stopped." About half an hour later, the White House's Rapid Response 47 account, quoting the Los Angeles Times post of its story, wrote (opens in a new tab) "No, he didn't, you buffoons" and said Trump "was saying the U.S. is fighting to STOP Iran from having the ability to take out LA and San Diego with a nuclear weapon." In the speech, Trump spoke about stopping Iran from getting a nuclear weapon about six to seven minutes before the remark, at 5:00 and 6:15. He did not mention it in the passage itself, and he made the "I stopped them from ever having" remark about 13 minutes after it.

CNN (opens in a new tab) reports that Trump has repeatedly called high gas prices a small price to pay for the war, and that in Nebraska he appeared to contrast that with a far higher price, an attack on a U.S. city. Where officials stand on the war itself is tracked in a separate case (opens in a new tab).

As of the afternoon of October 6, 2026, we did not find a statement from Trump himself explaining the remark. Apart from Jim Desmond, a Republican San Diego County supervisor running for Congress, and Kiley, a former Republican running as an independent, we did not find an elected Republican who had addressed it as of October 6, 2026. The recording establishes what Trump said and what came before and after it. It does not establish what he meant.

People in this case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

26 updates added in the last 7 days.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Timeline

6 timeline entries on this page. Dates: October 5, 2026 to October 6, 2026

  1. October 2026

    6 events

    1. Trump says 'Let them take out Los Angeles' at Nebraska rally

      Incident

      At a midterm campaign rally in Grand Island, Nebraska, President Trump called the war's costs "a small price to pay for keeping the world safe, keeping our country safe" and said, "They can take out a city. Let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego." The passage followed remarks about the midterm elections and did not mention nuclear weapons. About six to seven minutes earlier, Trump had said Iran "will not have a nuclear weapon." The time is approximate, based on the remark's position in a live broadcast and on the earliest clips of it, posted at 23:44 and 23:45 UTC.

      [01]FULL SPEECH: President Trump Holds Massive Rally in Grand Island, NE - 10/05/26

      Right Side Broadcasting Network's unedited video of President Trump's full speech at the Pinnacle Bank Expo Center in Grand Island, Nebraska, on October 5, 2026, posted to YouTube after the live broadcast. The Los Angeles and San Diego remark comes about 12 minutes into the speech, after a passage on the midterm elections. Trump's earlier statements that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon come about six to seven minutes before it.

      FULL SPEECH: President Trump Holds Massive Rally in Grand Island, NE - 10/05/26 · Right Side Broadcasting NetworkRemark at 12:20 to 12:40; Iran war and nuclear weapon passage at 4:23 to 6:31
    2. California officials and candidates condemn the remark

      Reaction

      Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote that Trump was "now saying our foreign enemies should 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego" and called him "deranged and dangerous." Within the next two hours, Sen. Alex Padilla, Rep. Sara Jacobs, San Diego County Supervisor Jim Desmond (the Republican candidate in the 48th District), San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria, Sen. Adam Schiff, Xavier Becerra, Democratic House candidate Marni von Wilpert, Rep. Scott Peters and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass also criticized the remark on X.

      [02]Gavin Newsom's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      California Gov. Gavin Newsom's post on his personal X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark posted by the commentator Acyn.

      [03]Alex Padilla's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      Sen. Alex Padilla's post on his Senate X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

      [04]Sara Jacobs's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      Rep. Sara Jacobs's post on her congressional X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

      [05]Todd Gloria's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria's post on his official X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

      [06]Jim Desmond's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      Post on the X account of Jim Desmond's congressional campaign. Desmond, a San Diego County supervisor, is the Republican candidate in California's 48th District.

      [07]Adam Schiff's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      Sen. Adam Schiff's post on his Senate X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

      [08]Xavier Becerra's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      Xavier Becerra's post on his X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark. Becerra is a Democratic candidate for governor of California.

      [09]Scott Peters's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      Rep. Scott Peters's post on his congressional X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

      [10]Karen Bass's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass's post on her official X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

      [11]Marni von Wilpert's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      Post on the X account of Marni von Wilpert's congressional campaign. Von Wilpert is the Democratic candidate in California's 48th District.

    3. Los Angeles Times reports Trump suggested letting Iran 'take out' the two cities

      Source release

      The Los Angeles Times published a story headlined "Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego at campaign rally," saying the comment was possibly in jest. The White House's Rapid Response 47 account later responded to the Times' post of the story.

      [12]Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego at campaign rally

      Los Angeles Times report on the remark, which says it was possibly in jest. The White House's Rapid Response 47 account replied to the Times post that linked this story.

    4. Cheung says Trump meant the threat from a nuclear Iran

      Claim

      White House Communications Director Steven Cheung wrote that the reaction to Trump's comments was "not rooted in reality" and that Trump "was clearly stating U.S. cities would have been threatened if a nuclear Iran hadn't been stopped."

      [13]Steven Cheung's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      White House Communications Director Steven Cheung's post on X, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

    5. White House Rapid Response account says the U.S. is fighting to stop a nuclear attack on the cities

      Claim

      Quoting the Los Angeles Times post, the White House's Rapid Response 47 account wrote "No, he didn't, you buffoons" and said Trump "was saying the U.S. is fighting to STOP Iran from having the ability to take out LA and San Diego with a nuclear weapon."

      [14]Rapid Response 47's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      Post by the White House's Rapid Response 47 account on X, quoting a Los Angeles Times post that linked its story headlined "Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego at campaign rally."

    6. Democratic National Committee calls the remark 'disgusting and dangerous'

      Reaction

      The Democratic National Committee posted the remark and wrote, "Disgusting and dangerous. End the war and hold him accountable."

      [15]Democratic National Committee's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

      Post by the Democratic National Committee's X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

Claims

Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.

What's disputed

Response record

Responses

Latest recorded positions: 13. Dates: October 5, 2026 to October 6, 2026

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

12 responses on this page

  1. Democratic National CommitteeDemocratic National Committee, official X accountDirectly involved
    "Disgusting and dangerous. End the war and hold him accountable."
    Condemned

    Case context: What did Trump mean when he said 'Let them take out Los Angeles' at a Nebraska rally?

    Read more

    The Democratic National Committee wrote on X, "Trump's new message on his Iran war: 'Let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego.' Disgusting and dangerous. End the war and hold him accountable."

    Before the statement

    The post, quoting a video clip of the rally remark, opens: "Trump's new message on his Iran war: 'Let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego.'"

    After the statement

    This is the end of the post.

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. The committee quotes the remark as Trump's "new message" on the war and calls it "Disgusting and dangerous," condemning the remark without spelling out a reading of it. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but the post criticizes the remark itself rather than disputing any description of it. Evidence: the committee's own post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. Todd GloriaMayor of San Diego, in a statement issued by his officeDirectly involved
    "No American city, regardless of its politics or geography, should ever be described as expendable or an acceptable price to pay."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump accepts attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego as a cost of the Iran war: "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."

    Read more

    In a statement issued by his office on October 6, 2026, San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria said Trump "so casually dismissed" the lives of San Diego's nearly 1.4 million residents, that no American city "should ever be described as expendable or an acceptable price to pay," and that Trump should retract the remarks and apologize to the people of San Diego.

    Before the statement

    The statement was issued the morning after the rally, and its introduction says it followed Trump's suggestion "that a foreign adversary could 'take out' San Diego" and his calling it a "small price to pay." Gloria opened by describing San Diego as "an anchor of our nation's security in the Pacific" and home to servicemembers, shipbuilders and researchers.

    After the statement

    Gloria continued, "San Diegans deserve a President who values their lives, honors the service and sacrifice of our military families, and takes seriously his responsibility as Commander in Chief. President Trump should retract these remarks and apologize to the people of San Diego." He closed, "A President does not get to decide which American communities are worth protecting. His duty is to all of us."

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Gloria's statement treats the remark as describing San Diego as expendable and asks for a retraction and an apology, which adopts the critics' reading and criticizes the remark. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but he objects to what he takes Trump to have said rather than disputing how others described it. This is a separate occasion from his October 5 post on X. Evidence: the statement as published by the Mayor's office.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  3. Karen BassMayor of Los AngelesDirectly involved
    "The President of the United States suggested that a foreign government attack Los Angeles. His statements against our city are dangerous and could potentially compromise our safety."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump was saying that foreign enemies of the United States should "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego.

    Read more

    Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass wrote on X that the president "suggested that a foreign government attack Los Angeles," that his statements were dangerous and could compromise the city's safety, and that "The role of a president is to protect the country, not to actively threaten it and encourage attacks on American lives."

    Before the statement

    Bass posted later that evening, quoting a video clip of the rally remark.

    After the statement

    She added, "In the face of irresponsible threats, as Angelenos, we know how to stand together and protect our city."

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Bass says Trump suggested that a foreign government attack the city and that he encouraged attacks on Americans, which asserts and condemns the critics' reading. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but she states her own reading of the remark and criticizes it rather than only disputing a description. Evidence: Bass's own post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  4. Scott PetersU.S. representative from California's 50th DistrictDirectly involved
    "America knows San Diego is not a “small price to pay” for his inability to resolve it."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump accepts attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego as a cost of the Iran war: "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."

    Read more

    Rep. Scott Peters wrote on X that San Diego is a military town awaiting the return of sailors and Marines from the USS Lincoln, and that "America knows San Diego is not a 'small price to pay' for his inability to resolve" the war.

    Before the statement

    Peters's post, quoting a video clip of the rally remark, opens: "San Diego is a proud military town, home to 115,000 courageous active duty servicemembers and their families. Military service is at the root of our community and culture. This month we await the return home of the sailors and marines still stranded on the USS Lincoln for months thanks to Donald Trump's reckless war in Iran."

    After the statement

    This sentence ends the post.

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Peters rejects the idea that San Diego could be a "small price to pay" for the war, which treats the remark as accepting harm to the city and criticizes Trump. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but Peters objects to what he takes Trump to have said rather than disputing how others described it. Evidence: Peters's own post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  5. Marni von WilpertDemocratic candidate for U.S. House in California's 48th DistrictDirectly involved
    "Donald Trump says Los Angeles and San Diego being attacked would be ‘a small price to pay’ for his reckless Iran war. That is appalling and terrifying."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump accepts attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego as a cost of the Iran war: "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."

    Read more

    Marni von Wilpert, the Democratic candidate in California's 48th Congressional District, wrote on X that Trump says an attack on Los Angeles and San Diego "would be 'a small price to pay'" for the war, called that "appalling and terrifying" and called the remark "an impeachable offense." She also criticized her Republican opponent, Jim Desmond, for supporting the war.

    Before the statement

    Von Wilpert posted later that evening. FOX 5 San Diego reported that she also issued the statement in a news release.

    After the statement

    She goes on to call the remark "an impeachable offense by the Commander in Chief" and says it is indefensible that Desmond "continues to support Trump's war."

    San Diego officials condemn Trump's rhetoric on U.S.-Iran war costs · FOX 5 San DiegoFull article, updated October 5, 2026, 11:01 p.m. Pacific

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Von Wilpert states the critics' reading directly, that Trump called an attack on the two cities a small price to pay, and condemns it. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but she adopts and criticizes that reading rather than disputing a description. Evidence: von Wilpert's own campaign post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  6. Xavier BecerraDemocratic candidate for governor of CaliforniaDirectly involved
    "Their lives are not a “small price to pay” or a punchline for Donald Trump."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump accepts attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego as a cost of the Iran war: "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."

    Read more

    Xavier Becerra, a Democratic candidate for governor of California, wrote on X that 13 million Californians live in Los Angeles and San Diego counties and that "Their lives are not a 'small price to pay' or a punchline for Donald Trump."

    Before the statement

    Becerra's post, quoting a video clip of the rally remark, opens: "Thirteen million Californians call LA and San Diego counties home."

    After the statement

    This sentence ends the post.

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Becerra rejects the idea that the residents of the two counties are a "small price to pay," which treats the remark as accepting harm to them, and he criticizes Trump for it. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization. His line that Californians' lives are not "a punchline for Donald Trump" accuses Trump of joking about them, which is a criticism of the remark rather than a dispute over how others described it. Evidence: Becerra's own post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

View all 12 responsesShow fewer responses
  1. Adam SchiffU.S. senator from CaliforniaDirectly involved
    "And if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump accepts attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego as a cost of the Iran war: "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."

    Read more

    Sen. Adam Schiff wrote on X that Trump says the Iran war will end "very soon," asked how many times that promise has been made, and said, "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."

    Before the statement

    Schiff's post, quoting a video clip of the rally remark, opens: "The President says the Iran war will end 'very soon.' How many times have we heard that promise?"

    After the statement

    This sentence ends the post.

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Schiff reads the remark as Trump accepting attacks on two American cities as a cost of the war and criticizes him for it, which asserts the critics' reading. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because the sentence begins with "if"; but the condition restates what Schiff takes Trump to have said, and the post's conclusion about Trump is not conditional. Evidence: Schiff's own post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. Todd GloriaMayor of San DiegoDirectly involved
    "San Diego is not collateral damage."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump accepts attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego as a cost of the Iran war: "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."

    Read more

    San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria wrote on X, "San Diego is not collateral damage. We are not expendable. And we are never a 'small price to pay.' Keep our city out of your reckless war talk."

    Before the statement

    Gloria posted later that evening, quoting a video clip of the rally remark.

    After the statement

    The post continues: "We are not expendable. And we are never a 'small price to pay.' Keep our city out of your reckless war talk."

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Gloria answers the remark by rejecting the idea that his city could be a "small price to pay" or collateral damage of the war, which treats the remark as accepting harm to San Diego and criticizes it. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but his post objects to what he takes Trump to have said rather than disputing how others described it. Evidence: Gloria's own post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  3. Jim DesmondSan Diego County supervisor and Republican candidate for U.S. House in California's 48th DistrictDirectly involved
    "As a Navy veteran, I served to protect Americans, not write off American cities as an acceptable price of war."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump accepts attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego as a cost of the Iran war: "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."

    Read more

    Jim Desmond, a Republican San Diego County supervisor running in California's 48th Congressional District, wrote on X that he "vehemently" disagreed with Trump's comments, that the commander in chief's first responsibility is to protect Americans, and that as a Navy veteran he "served to protect Americans, not write off American cities as an acceptable price of war."

    Before the statement

    The post opens: "I vehemently disagree with President Trump's comments. America must stand up to Iran and defend our interests, but the first responsibility of our Commander in Chief is to protect the American people and our homeland."

    After the statement

    It continues: "No American city is expendable, and no American family should ever be treated as collateral damage."

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Desmond reads the remark as writing off American cities as an acceptable price of war and says he vehemently disagrees, which asserts and condemns the critics' reading. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because he also says America must stand up to Iran; but that is support for the war's aims, not a defense of the remark. Evidence: Desmond's own campaign post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  4. Sara JacobsU.S. representative from California's 51st DistrictDirectly involved
    "not acceptable collateral damage in Trump’s stupid war."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump accepts attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego as a cost of the Iran war: "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."

    Read more

    Rep. Sara Jacobs, whose district is in San Diego, wrote on X that her constituents, including many active-duty service members, veterans and their families, "are not acceptable collateral damage in Trump's stupid war."

    Before the statement

    Jacobs's post quotes a video clip of the rally remark. It opens with "My constituents" and the phrase "including many active duty service members, veterans, and their families," followed by "are" and the words quoted here.

    After the statement

    This sentence ends the post.

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Jacobs answers the remark by rejecting the idea that her constituents are acceptable collateral damage, which treats the remark as accepting harm to San Diego and criticizes it. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but she objects to what she takes Trump to have said rather than to how others described it. Evidence: Jacobs's own post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  5. Alex PadillaU.S. senator from CaliforniaDirectly involved
    "Now Trump is in Nebraska inviting an attack on U.S. soil, putting millions of Americans and hundreds of thousands of our servicemembers at risk while trying to get Americans to cheer for an attack on our own country."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump was saying that foreign enemies of the United States should "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego.

    Read more

    Sen. Alex Padilla wrote on X that at least 19 service members, including Noah Tietjens of Nebraska, have died in the war, and that Trump was in Nebraska "inviting an attack on U.S. soil" while trying to get Americans to cheer for it. "What kind of Commander in Chief does that?" he asked.

    Before the statement

    Padilla's post, quoting a video clip of the rally remark, begins by saying at least 19 service members have died in the war, including Noah Tietjens of Nebraska.

    After the statement

    It ends: "What kind of Commander in Chief does that?"

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Padilla reads the remark as inviting an attack on the United States and criticizes Trump for it, which asserts and condemns the critics' reading. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but Padilla states his own reading and condemns the conduct. Evidence: Padilla's own post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  6. Gavin NewsomGovernor of CaliforniaDirectly involved
    "After sending the National Guard and Marines to occupy California, Donald Trump is now saying our foreign enemies should “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Trump was saying that foreign enemies of the United States should "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego.

    Read more

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote on X that after sending the National Guard and Marines to California, Trump "is now saying our foreign enemies should 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego," and added, "He is deranged and dangerous."

    Before the statement

    Newsom posted about two hours after the remark, quoting a 34-second clip of it posted by the commentator Acyn.

    After the statement

    His post ends: "He is deranged and dangerous." Newsom's official governor's account later called the remark "Disgusting and disqualifying."

    Why this label?

    The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Newsom reads the remark as Trump saying foreign enemies should attack the two cities and calls him dangerous, which asserts and condemns the critics' reading. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but Newsom does more than dispute a description: he states what he says Trump meant and criticizes it. Evidence: Newsom's own post on X.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

Sources

(21)

Original video

FULL SPEECH: President Trump Holds Massive Rally in Grand Island, NE - 10/05/26

FULL SPEECH: President Trump Holds Massive Rally in Grand Island, NE - 10/05/26 (opens in a new tab) · Right Side Broadcasting NetworkRemark at 12:20 to 12:40; Iran war and nuclear weapon passage at 4:23 to 6:31

About this source

Right Side Broadcasting Network's unedited video of President Trump's full speech at the Pinnacle Bank Expo Center in Grand Island, Nebraska, on October 5, 2026, posted to YouTube after the live broadcast. The Los Angeles and San Diego remark comes about 12 minutes into the speech, after a passage on the midterm elections. Trump's earlier statements that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon come about six to seven minutes before it.

Published
Accessed

Official statement

Mayor Gloria statement on President Trump's remarks about San Diego

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Third paragraph of the statement.

Excerpt

"No American city, regardless of its politics or geography, should ever be described as expendable or an acceptable price to pay. … President Trump should retract these remarks and apologize to the people of San Diego."

About this source

Statement issued by San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria's office on October 6, 2026, responding to Trump's October 5 rally remark. The office also distributed it by email to media, including Dispute Index.

Author
Office of Mayor Todd Gloria
Published
Accessed

Reporting

San Diego officials condemn Trump's rhetoric on U.S.-Iran war costs

San Diego officials condemn Trump's rhetoric on U.S.-Iran war costs (opens in a new tab) · FOX 5 San DiegoFull article, updated October 5, 2026, 11:01 p.m. Pacific
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article, updated October 5, 2026, 11:01 p.m. Pacific

About this source

FOX 5 San Diego report on reactions from San Diego officials. It reports that Marni von Wilpert issued her statement in a news release and identifies Jim Desmond as a San Diego County supervisor.

Author
Chris Ponce
Published
Accessed

Reporting

'You buffoons': Trump team defends remarks about Iran 'taking out' LA, San Diego

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article

About this source

Report by The National News Desk, carried by Fox 17 and other Sinclair stations, on the Rapid Response 47 post. It notes that Trump did not mention nuclear weapons in the rally remarks.

Author
Alexx Altman-DeVilbiss, The National News Desk
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego at campaign rally

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article

About this source

Los Angeles Times report on the remark, which says it was possibly in jest. The White House's Rapid Response 47 account replied to the Times post that linked this story.

Author
Iris Kwok, Richard Winton and Ana Ceballos
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

California officials condemn Trump for saying Iran could 'take out' Los Angeles or San Diego

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article

About this source

NBC News report quoting the remark, Cheung's response and reactions from Newsom, Bass, Gloria, Sen. Alex Padilla and Sen. Adam Schiff.

Author
Megan Brand
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Trump suggests allowing Iran to "take out" LA and San Diego during campaign rally

Trump suggests allowing Iran to "take out" LA and San Diego during campaign rally (opens in a new tab) · CBS News Los AngelesFull article, updated October 6, 2026, 8:55 a.m. Pacific
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article, updated October 6, 2026, 8:55 a.m. Pacific

About this source

CBS News Los Angeles report on the remark and reactions. Its lede describes the remark as being about Iran developing a nuclear weapon, its transcription includes both restarts before "Los Angeles," and it says it was not immediately clear what Trump meant.

Author
Tom Wait
Published
Accessed

Reporting

Trump draws backlash after he suggests Iran could 'take out' Los Angeles or San Diego

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article

About this source

CNN report on the remark, Steven Cheung's response and reactions from California officials. CNN says Trump appeared to contrast high gas prices with a far higher price, an attack on a U.S. city.

Author
Lauren Chadwick
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original post

Democratic National Committee's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

Post by the Democratic National Committee's X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Rapid Response 47's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

Post by the White House's Rapid Response 47 account on X, quoting a Los Angeles Times post that linked its story headlined "Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego at campaign rally."

Published
Accessed

Original post

Steven Cheung's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung's post on X, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Marni von Wilpert's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

Post on the X account of Marni von Wilpert's congressional campaign. Von Wilpert is the Democratic candidate in California's 48th District.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Jim Desmond's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

Post on the X account of Jim Desmond's congressional campaign. Desmond, a San Diego County supervisor, is the Republican candidate in California's 48th District.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Xavier Becerra's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

Xavier Becerra's post on his X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark. Becerra is a Democratic candidate for governor of California.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Scott Peters's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

Rep. Scott Peters's post on his congressional X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Sara Jacobs's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

Rep. Sara Jacobs's post on her congressional X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Adam Schiff's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

Sen. Adam Schiff's post on his Senate X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Alex Padilla's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

Sen. Alex Padilla's post on his Senate X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Todd Gloria's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria's post on his official X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Karen Bass's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass's post on her official X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

Published
Accessed

Original post

Gavin Newsom's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark

About this source

California Gov. Gavin Newsom's post on his personal X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark posted by the commentator Acyn.

Published
Accessed

Corrections

(2)

Corrections address errors in our reporting or labels. When a speaker changes their position, we add a separate statement and link it to the earlier one.

Classification correction

Correction to: Statement by Rapid Response 47

Previous classification
Position Event #4890 classified the Rapid Response 47 post as "Defended or excused."
Corrected classification
The statement disputes the critics' reading of the remark and offers a different one, so the classification is "Challenged the characterization."

In this case Defended or excused would mean arguing that an Iranian attack on Los Angeles or San Diego would be acceptable. The statement does not argue that; it rejects the critics' interpretation and gives the White House's. The rationale was revised to match.

This corrects an editorial classification.

Rapid Response 47's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark (opens in a new tab) · Rapid Response 47Original post

Post by the White House's Rapid Response 47 account on X, quoting a Los Angeles Times post that linked its story headlined "Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego at campaign rally."

Trump suggests letting Iran 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego at campaign rally (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles TimesFull article

Los Angeles Times report on the remark, which says it was possibly in jest. The White House's Rapid Response 47 account replied to the Times post that linked this story.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Classification correction

Correction to: Statement by Steven Cheung

Previous classification
Position Event #4889 classified Steven Cheung's statement as "Defended or excused."
Corrected classification
The statement disputes the critics' reading of the remark and offers a different one, so the classification is "Challenged the characterization."

In this case Defended or excused would mean arguing that an Iranian attack on Los Angeles or San Diego would be acceptable. The statement does not argue that; it rejects the critics' interpretation and gives the White House's. The rationale was revised to match.

This corrects an editorial classification.

Steven Cheung's post on Trump's Los Angeles and San Diego remark (opens in a new tab) · Steven CheungOriginal post

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung's post on X, quoting a clip of the rally remark.

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

26 updates added in the last 7 days.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
What did Trump mean when he said 'Let them take out Los Angeles' at a Nebraska rally?
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/cases/what-did-trump-mean-let-them-take-out-los-angeles

The Dispute Index. "What did Trump mean when he said 'Let them take out Los Angeles' at a Nebraska rally?". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/cases/what-did-trump-mean-let-them-take-out-los-angeles