Schiff says Trump is 'not troubled by the cost' of attacks on two American cities
Adam SchiffU.S. senator from California
Sen. Adam Schiff wrote on X that Trump says the Iran war will end "very soon," asked how many times that promise has been made, and said, "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."
Responding to
Trump accepts attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego as a cost of the Iran war: "if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost."
“And if it means attacks on two major American cities in the process, he is not troubled by the cost.”
Original post

Where this statement fits
What did Trump mean when he said 'Let them take out Los Angeles' at a Nebraska rally?
At a campaign rally in Grand Island, Nebraska, on October 5, 2026, President Donald Trump called the costs of the Iran war "a small price to pay for keeping the world safe" and said, "They can take out a city. Let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego." The passage followed remarks about the midterm elections and did not mention nuclear weapons; Trump had said earlier in the speech that Iran will not have one. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, the mayors of Los Angeles and San Diego and other critics said Trump was inviting attacks on the two cities or treating them as an acceptable price for the war. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung said Trump was stating that U.S. cities would have been threatened if a nuclear Iran had not been stopped. The dispute is over what Trump meant.
Source and context
Original post
About this source
Sen. Adam Schiff's post on his Senate X account, quoting a clip of the rally remark.
Before the quotation
Schiff's post, quoting a video clip of the rally remark, opens: "The President says the Iran war will end 'very soon.' How many times have we heard that promise?"
After the quotation
This sentence ends the post.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Schiff reads the remark as Trump accepting attacks on two American cities as a cost of the war and criticizes him for it, which asserts the critics' reading. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because the sentence begins with "if"; but the condition restates what Schiff takes Trump to have said, and the post's conclusion about Trump is not conditional. Evidence: Schiff's own post on X.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Donald Trump
More from this case
Read the full caseDemocratic National Committee calls the remark 'disgusting and dangerous'
Democratic National Committee
“Disgusting and dangerous. End the war and hold him accountable.”Read statement
Todd Gloria says no American city should be "an acceptable price to pay" and asks Trump to retract the remark
“No American city, regardless of its politics or geography, should ever be described as expendable or an acceptable price to pay.”Read statement
White House Rapid Response account says Trump meant stopping a nuclear Iran
Rapid Response 47
“He was saying the U.S. is fighting to STOP Iran from having the ability to take out LA and San Diego with a nuclear weapon”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Schiff says Trump is 'not troubled by the cost' of attacks on two American cities
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4882-sen-adam-schiff-wrote-on-x-that-trump
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Schiff says Trump is 'not troubled by the cost' of attacks on two American cities". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4882-sen-adam-schiff-wrote-on-x-that-trump