Did Susan Collins Trade Federal Contract Support for Navatek Campaign Donations?

Martin Kao alleged that Susan Collins knowingly linked Navatek campaign support to federal-contract assistance. Collins's office and other participants deny a quid pro quo, while official records establish separate illegal contributions by Navatek-linked actors.

Claim in dispute

Susan Collins knowingly participated in a pay-to-play arrangement in which Navatek campaign support was exchanged for her office's assistance obtaining federal contracts.

Susan Collins in an official Senate portrait beside a Navatek-developed amphibious craft on a Hawaii beach.
Sen. Susan Collins, right, and a Navatek-developed Marine Corps amphibious craft during a 2014 test in Hawaii. The composite does not depict Collins with the craft or its personnel.

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Overview

Navatek and its executives pursued federal research funding while donating to Susan Collins's campaign and to 1820 PAC, an independent committee supporting her 2020 reelection. Federal records later established that Navatek money had been routed through a shell company and reimbursed contributors in violation of campaign-finance law. Kao subsequently told FBI agents that donations were part of a broader pay-to-play method and alleged that Collins understood the exchange. ProPublica reported emails and internal records consistent with portions of his account. Collins's deputy chief of staff called the allegations categorically false and outlandish; an FBI spokesperson said an earlier investigation found nothing implicating Collins or her campaign. Scott Reed, Glen Mandigo and Andy Winer also denied communications, advice, knowledge or participation that would establish a contribution-for-official-action agreement. Kao was seeking sentencing consideration when he cooperated, and no one working for Collins was charged. The dispute is whether Collins knowingly participated in an exchange, not whether Navatek-linked illegal contributions occurred.

People in this case

Timeline

6 timeline entries on this page. Dates: August 6, 2019 to September 22, 2026

  1. August 2019

    1 event

    1. Collins joins announcement of an $8 million Navy contract for Navatek

      Incident

      Susan Collins appeared with Martin Kao at Navatek's Portland office as the company announced an $8 million Navy research contract. Collins said she had strongly advocated for the funding; the later dispute concerns whether campaign support was knowingly tied to contract assistance.

      [01]The FBI Anti-Corruption Squad Was Circling Susan Collins — Until Trump Got in the Way

      Source excerpt

      Kao told FBI agents and prosecutors that Navatek used campaign support to obtain government funding and that Collins was a willing participant; Collins's office, Reed, lobbyists and the FBI disputed material parts of that account.

      Anchor investigation reporting previously undisclosed FBI cooperation interviews, internal company emails, campaign and lobbying communications, and responses from Collins's office, the FBI, Scott Reed, Glen Mandigo, Andy Winer and Steven Loui. The article says Kao had credibility incentives and that no one working for Collins was charged.

      The FBI Anti-Corruption Squad Was Circling Susan Collins — Until Trump Got in the WayReporting Highlights; opening account of the Corner Bakery meeting; sections “Kao to Collins: ‘Here to Help’” and “Downfall, Cover-up”
  2. 143 days between recorded events

    December 2019

    1 event

    1. Navatek-funded shell company contributes $150,000 to 1820 PAC

      Incident

      The Society of Young Women Scientist and Engineers, an entity funded by Navatek and controlled by Martin Kao, contributed $150,000 to the pro-Collins 1820 PAC. Federal proceedings later established that the contribution unlawfully concealed its true source.

      [02]Federal Election Commission Matter Under Review 7690

      Source excerpt

      The docket documents the complaint, investigation and $325,000 conciliation agreement concerning PacMar Technologies' use of a shell company to fund a $150,000 contribution to 1820 PAC.

      Official administrative record for the donor-side campaign-finance violations. It establishes Navatek/PacMar's unlawful funding and concealment of the contribution but does not establish that Susan Collins knowingly participated in a quid pro quo.

      Federal Election Commission Matter Under Review 7690Matter Under Review 7690; complaint, responses, general counsel reports, conciliation agreement and final disposition
      [03]Indictment of Martin Kao, Clifford Chen and Lawrence Lum Kee for unlawful campaign contributions

      Source excerpt

      The indictment alleges that executives used Navatek funds, a shell company and reimbursed contributors to make prohibited contributions benefiting a federal candidate committee and political committee.

      Federal charging document for the straw-donor, conduit-contribution and government-contractor contribution scheme. The document does not charge Collins, her staff, Collins for Senator or 1820 PAC personnel with bribery.

      Indictment of Martin Kao, Clifford Chen and Lawrence Lum Kee for unlawful campaign contributionsUnited States v. Kao, Chen and Lum Kee, D.D.C., indictment, pages 4–15
  3. 508 days between recorded events

    May 2021

    1 event

    1. Axios reports an FBI investigation into Navatek-linked contributions

      Source release

      Axios reported that an FBI search-warrant application described a suspected scheme involving Navatek-linked donations benefiting Susan Collins's campaign and 1820 PAC. Collins's campaign said it had no knowledge of the alleged conduct.

      [04]Feds investigating alleged illegal donations to Collins’ re-election bid

      Source excerpt

      “The Collins for Senator Campaign had absolutely no knowledge of anything alleged in the warrant.”

      Contemporaneous reporting on the initial FBI investigation and unsealed search-warrant application. Axios reported there was no indication at that time that Collins or her team knew of the illegal donation scheme.

      Feds investigating alleged illegal donations to Collins’ re-election bid · AxiosOpening section, “What’s happening” and “What they’re saying”
  4. 267 days between recorded events

    February 2022

    1 event

    1. Federal grand jury indicts Kao and two former Navatek executives

      Incident

      A federal grand jury charged Martin Kao, Clifford Chen and Lawrence Lum Kee in a conduit-contribution scheme involving money reimbursed by Navatek. No one working for Susan Collins was charged.

      [03]Indictment of Martin Kao, Clifford Chen and Lawrence Lum Kee for unlawful campaign contributions

      Source excerpt

      The indictment alleges that executives used Navatek funds, a shell company and reimbursed contributors to make prohibited contributions benefiting a federal candidate committee and political committee.

      Federal charging document for the straw-donor, conduit-contribution and government-contractor contribution scheme. The document does not charge Collins, her staff, Collins for Senator or 1820 PAC personnel with bribery.

      Indictment of Martin Kao, Clifford Chen and Lawrence Lum Kee for unlawful campaign contributionsUnited States v. Kao, Chen and Lum Kee, D.D.C., indictment, pages 4–15
  5. 1100 days between recorded events

    February 2025

    1 event

    1. FEC resolves the Navatek campaign-finance matter

      Incident

      The Federal Election Commission approved a conciliation agreement with PacMar Technologies, formerly Navatek, over prohibited contractor contributions and contributions made in the names of others. The company agreed to a $325,000 civil penalty.

      [02]Federal Election Commission Matter Under Review 7690

      Source excerpt

      The docket documents the complaint, investigation and $325,000 conciliation agreement concerning PacMar Technologies' use of a shell company to fund a $150,000 contribution to 1820 PAC.

      Official administrative record for the donor-side campaign-finance violations. It establishes Navatek/PacMar's unlawful funding and concealment of the contribution but does not establish that Susan Collins knowingly participated in a quid pro quo.

      Federal Election Commission Matter Under Review 7690Matter Under Review 7690; complaint, responses, general counsel reports, conciliation agreement and final disposition
      [05]Major Victory: CLC Complaint Delivers Rare Accountability for Maine Voters

      Source excerpt

      “Collins had previously supported Navatek’s contract work with the government (the complaint did not allege involvement by Collins or her campaign).”

      Campaign Legal Center account of the FEC matter and resulting PacMar penalty. It is useful for distinguishing the established campaign-finance violations from the later allegation that Collins knowingly participated.

      Major Victory: CLC Complaint Delivers Rare Accountability for Maine VotersDiscussion of the 2020 complaint, FEC disposition and Collins limitation
  6. 586 days between recorded events

    September 2026

    1 event

    1. ProPublica publishes Kao's allegations and the competing denials

      Source release

      ProPublica reported that Martin Kao told investigators Collins and people around her knowingly participated in a pay-to-play arrangement. Collins's office, an FBI spokesperson and several participants disputed the account, while Maine Senate candidate Troy Jackson called for answers.

      [01]The FBI Anti-Corruption Squad Was Circling Susan Collins — Until Trump Got in the Way

      Source excerpt

      Kao told FBI agents and prosecutors that Navatek used campaign support to obtain government funding and that Collins was a willing participant; Collins's office, Reed, lobbyists and the FBI disputed material parts of that account.

      Anchor investigation reporting previously undisclosed FBI cooperation interviews, internal company emails, campaign and lobbying communications, and responses from Collins's office, the FBI, Scott Reed, Glen Mandigo, Andy Winer and Steven Loui. The article says Kao had credibility incentives and that no one working for Collins was charged.

      The FBI Anti-Corruption Squad Was Circling Susan Collins — Until Trump Got in the WayReporting Highlights; opening account of the Corner Bakery meeting; sections “Kao to Collins: ‘Here to Help’” and “Downfall, Cover-up”
      [06]Annie Clark denies the Navatek pay-to-play allegations against Susan Collins

      Source excerpt

      “The seven-year-old allegations made against Senator Collins and her staff in this piece are categorically false.”

      Primary statement from Collins's deputy chief of staff responding to the ProPublica report. Clark disputes the allegations, attacks Kao's credibility, describes the campaign's cooperation with investigators and says the FBI has not contacted the office about Kao since 2021.

      [07]Troy Jackson calls the reported Collins–Navatek arrangement corruption

      Source excerpt

      “This is corruption of the highest order.”

      Primary statement from Collins's Democratic Senate opponent reacting to the ProPublica investigation and demanding answers about contracts and conversations involving Collins's team.

Claims

Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.

What's disputed

Disputed claim

The allegations that Susan Collins or her staff engaged in extortion, pay-to-play or bribery involving Navatek are categorically false.

Annie Clark

Sources (3)

Response record

Responses

Latest recorded positions: 7. Dates: September 22, 2026

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

0 responses on this page

No responses match these filters.

Clear response filters

Sources

(7)

Reporting

The FBI Anti-Corruption Squad Was Circling Susan Collins — Until Trump Got in the Way

The FBI Anti-Corruption Squad Was Circling Susan Collins — Until Trump Got in the Way (opens in a new tab)Reporting Highlights; opening account of the Corner Bakery meeting; sections “Kao to Collins: ‘Here to Help’” and “Downfall, Cover-up”
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Reporting Highlights; opening account of the Corner Bakery meeting; sections “Kao to Collins: ‘Here to Help’” and “Downfall, Cover-up”

Excerpt

"Kao told FBI agents and prosecutors that Navatek used campaign support to obtain government funding and that Collins was a willing participant; Collins's office, Reed, lobbyists and the FBI disputed material parts of that account."

About this source

Anchor investigation reporting previously undisclosed FBI cooperation interviews, internal company emails, campaign and lobbying communications, and responses from Collins's office, the FBI, Scott Reed, Glen Mandigo, Andy Winer and Steven Loui. The article says Kao had credibility incentives and that no one working for Collins was charged.

Author
William Turton, Avi Asher-Schapiro, Molly Redden, and Kirsten Berg
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Analysis

Major Victory: CLC Complaint Delivers Rare Accountability for Maine Voters

Major Victory: CLC Complaint Delivers Rare Accountability for Maine Voters (opens in a new tab)Discussion of the 2020 complaint, FEC disposition and Collins limitation
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Discussion of the 2020 complaint, FEC disposition and Collins limitation

Excerpt

"“Collins had previously supported Navatek’s contract work with the government (the complaint did not allege involvement by Collins or her campaign).”"

About this source

Campaign Legal Center account of the FEC matter and resulting PacMar penalty. It is useful for distinguishing the established campaign-finance violations from the later allegation that Collins knowingly participated.

Author
Shanna Ports
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Indictment of Martin Kao, Clifford Chen and Lawrence Lum Kee for unlawful campaign contributions

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: United States v. Kao, Chen and Lum Kee, D.D.C., indictment, pages 4–15

Excerpt

"The indictment alleges that executives used Navatek funds, a shell company and reimbursed contributors to make prohibited contributions benefiting a federal candidate committee and political committee."

About this source

Federal charging document for the straw-donor, conduit-contribution and government-contractor contribution scheme. The document does not charge Collins, her staff, Collins for Senator or 1820 PAC personnel with bribery.

Author
U.S. Department of Justice
Published
Accessed

Original post

Troy Jackson calls the reported Collins–Navatek arrangement corruption

Excerpt

"“This is corruption of the highest order.”"

About this source

Primary statement from Collins's Democratic Senate opponent reacting to the ProPublica investigation and demanding answers about contracts and conversations involving Collins's team.

Author
Troy Jackson
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Federal Election Commission Matter Under Review 7690

Federal Election Commission Matter Under Review 7690 (opens in a new tab)Matter Under Review 7690; complaint, responses, general counsel reports, conciliation agreement and final disposition
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Matter Under Review 7690; complaint, responses, general counsel reports, conciliation agreement and final disposition

Excerpt

"The docket documents the complaint, investigation and $325,000 conciliation agreement concerning PacMar Technologies' use of a shell company to fund a $150,000 contribution to 1820 PAC."

About this source

Official administrative record for the donor-side campaign-finance violations. It establishes Navatek/PacMar's unlawful funding and concealment of the contribution but does not establish that Susan Collins knowingly participated in a quid pro quo.

Author
Federal Election Commission
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Feds investigating alleged illegal donations to Collins’ re-election bid

Feds investigating alleged illegal donations to Collins’ re-election bid (opens in a new tab) · AxiosOpening section, “What’s happening” and “What they’re saying”
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening section, “What’s happening” and “What they’re saying”

Excerpt

"“The Collins for Senator Campaign had absolutely no knowledge of anything alleged in the warrant.”"

About this source

Contemporaneous reporting on the initial FBI investigation and unsealed search-warrant application. Axios reported there was no indication at that time that Collins or her team knew of the illegal donation scheme.

Author
Lachlan Markay
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original post

Annie Clark denies the Navatek pay-to-play allegations against Susan Collins

Excerpt

"“The seven-year-old allegations made against Senator Collins and her staff in this piece are categorically false.”"

About this source

Primary statement from Collins's deputy chief of staff responding to the ProPublica report. Clark disputes the allegations, attacks Kao's credibility, describes the campaign's cooperation with investigators and says the FBI has not contacted the office about Kao since 2021.

Author
Annie Clark
Published
Accessed

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.