Michel Houellebecq is placed under formal investigation over 2022 remarks about Muslims; his lawyers say the words fall within free expression

A Nanterre investigating judge placed novelist Michel Houellebecq under formal investigation on November 10, 2026, over 2022 remarks about Muslims in Front Populaire. The groups that complained say the remarks provoke hatred; his lawyers say they contain no exhortation and are protected expression.

Michel Houellebecq, in glasses and a grey jacket, stands at a lectern holding sheets of paper, with a microphone and a bottle of water in front of him against a dark stage background.
Michel Houellebecq at a lectern during his talk in the Fronteiras do Pensamento lecture series at the Salão de Atos of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul in Porto Alegre, Brazil, on November 7, 2016. The photo predates the 2022 remarks and the 2026 investigation.

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Overview

Houellebecq won the Prix Goncourt in 2010 and has written about Islam in several novels, including Soumission (2015), which imagines a Muslim president coming to power in France. In the 2022 conversation he also predicted attacks and shootings in mosques and in cafes frequented by Muslims once whole territories came under Islamist control, which he called reverse Bataclans in reference to the jihadist attacks of November 13, 2015, in Paris. He also described the great replacement as a fact rather than a theory, according to BFMTV.

Front Populaire said in December 2022 that people who read the interview as a call for such attacks could not read. On January 5, 2023, Houellebecq acknowledged that some paragraphs were ambiguous and sent Le Figaro an amended version, Le Nouvel Obs reports. In his 2023 book Quelques mois dans ma vie, AFP reports, he called some of his remarks clumsy. The JDD reports that he faces up to one year in prison and a fine of 45,000 euros.

People in this case

Timeline

5 timeline entries on this page. Dates: November 16, 2022 to November 10, 2026

  1. November 2022

    1. Front Populaire announces a special issue built around the Houellebecq-Onfray conversation

      Source release

      Front Populaire, the magazine Michel Onfray founded, announces on X a new special issue devoted to a conversation between Onfray and Michel Houellebecq. In it, according to AFP and BFMTV, Houellebecq says the native-born French population wants Muslims to stop robbing and attacking them or else to leave, and predicts attacks on mosques once whole territories come under Islamist control.

      [01]Front Populaire

      Post on X by Front Populaire announcing a new special issue built around a conversation between Michel Houellebecq and Michel Onfray.

      Front Populaire's post on X announcing its Houellebecq-Onfray special issue · Front PopulairePost on X, November 16, 2022, 5:36 p.m. CET
      [02]BFMTV

      BFMTV report in French, written with AFP. It gives the full wording of the charge, quotes two passages of the November 2022 interview, says the Union des mosquées de France filed its complaint in Nanterre in January 2023, and quotes Houellebecq's lawyers.

      [03]Agence France-Presse

      AFP report in French, published by France 24 and carried by Yahoo Actualités. It reports that an investigating judge in Nanterre placed Michel Houellebecq under formal investigation on November 10, 2026, quotes the November 2022 remark at issue, and carries statements from his lawyers, Thibault de Montbrial and Louis Cailliez, and from Najwa El Haïté, lawyer for the Union des mosquées de France.

  2. December 2022

    1. Grande Mosquée de Paris announces a complaint against Houellebecq

      Reaction

      The Grande Mosquée de Paris says on X that it is filing a complaint against Houellebecq over remarks about French Muslims in the interview. Le HuffPost reports that the complaint went to the Paris prosecutor for provocation to hatred against Muslims.

      [04]Grande Mosquée de Paris

      Post on X by the Grande Mosquée de Paris announcing a complaint against Michel Houellebecq over remarks about French Muslims in a recent written interview. The post attaches the institution's statement, signed by its rector, Chems-eddine Hafiz.

      Grande Mosquée de Paris's post on X announcing its complaint against Michel Houellebecq · Grande Mosquée de ParisPost on X, December 28, 2022, 2:33 p.m. CET
      [05]Michel Houellebecq visé par une plainte de la grande mosquée de Paris

      Le HuffPost report in French on the Grande Mosquée de Paris complaint. It quotes the institution's statement and the passage of the interview it cited, and mentions Front Populaire's posts about its special issue.

  3. January 2023

    1. Grande Mosquée de Paris drops its complaint after meeting Houellebecq

      The rector of the Grande Mosquée de Paris, Chems-eddine Hafiz, announces that he is giving up legal action after reading the changes Houellebecq made to the disputed passages and the regrets he expressed, Le Nouvel Obs reports. According to the same report, the two men met on January 5, the day Houellebecq acknowledged that some paragraphs were ambiguous and sent Le Figaro an amended version.

      [06]Michel Houellebecq mis en examen quatre ans après des propos hostiles aux musulmans

      Le Nouvel Obs report in French. It summarizes the November 2022 remarks, the Grande Mosquée de Paris complaint and its withdrawal in January 2023, the complaints that the MRAP and the Union des mosquées de France kept, and comments from the MRAP, the federation's lawyer and Houellebecq's lawyers.

      [03]Agence France-Presse

      AFP report in French, published by France 24 and carried by Yahoo Actualités. It reports that an investigating judge in Nanterre placed Michel Houellebecq under formal investigation on November 10, 2026, quotes the November 2022 remark at issue, and carries statements from his lawyers, Thibault de Montbrial and Louis Cailliez, and from Najwa El Haïté, lawyer for the Union des mosquées de France.

    2. Union des mosquées de France files a complaint over the interview

      The Union des mosquées de France files a complaint against Houellebecq for provocation to discrimination, hatred or violence, according to its lawyer. AFP reports that the complaint, filed at the Nanterre court, also names Michel Onfray and Front Populaire's director, Stéphane Simon.

      [07]Une fédération de mosquées porte plainte contre Michel Houellebecq

      La Croix report in French that the Union des mosquées de France filed a complaint against Michel Houellebecq on January 13, 2023, for provocation to discrimination, hatred or violence, according to its lawyer.

      [03]Agence France-Presse

      AFP report in French, published by France 24 and carried by Yahoo Actualités. It reports that an investigating judge in Nanterre placed Michel Houellebecq under formal investigation on November 10, 2026, quotes the November 2022 remark at issue, and carries statements from his lawyers, Thibault de Montbrial and Louis Cailliez, and from Najwa El Haïté, lawyer for the Union des mosquées de France.

  4. November 2026

    1. Investigating judge in Nanterre places Houellebecq under formal investigation

      An investigating judge at the Nanterre court places Houellebecq under formal investigation for complicity in provocation to discrimination, hatred or violence against a group because of its origin or religion, Le Figaro reports, citing a source close to the case. Le Figaro says the prosecutor had pursued the case after criminal complaints by the Union des mosquées de France and the MRAP.

      [08]L'écrivain Michel Houellebecq mis en examen après des propos sur les musulmans et le «grand remplacement»

      Le Figaro report in French that first disclosed the formal investigation, citing a source close to the case. It says an investigating judge at the Nanterre court took the decision on November 10, 2026, after criminal complaints by the Union des mosquées de France and the MRAP, and that the rector of the Grande Mosquée de Paris dropped legal action after talking with Houellebecq in January 2023.

      [03]Agence France-Presse

      AFP report in French, published by France 24 and carried by Yahoo Actualités. It reports that an investigating judge in Nanterre placed Michel Houellebecq under formal investigation on November 10, 2026, quotes the November 2022 remark at issue, and carries statements from his lawyers, Thibault de Montbrial and Louis Cailliez, and from Najwa El Haïté, lawyer for the Union des mosquées de France.

      [02]BFMTV

      BFMTV report in French, written with AFP. It gives the full wording of the charge, quotes two passages of the November 2022 interview, says the Union des mosquées de France filed its complaint in Nanterre in January 2023, and quotes Houellebecq's lawyers.

Claims

Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.

What's disputed

Disputed claim

Michel Houellebecq

The wish of France's native-born population is not for Muslims to assimilate but for them to stop robbing and attacking them, or else, as another solution, for them to leave.

What is disputed

Houellebecq made the remark in a conversation with Michel Onfray published in Front Populaire's November 2022 special issue. AFP and BFMTV quote it in the shorter form; the JDD quotes a longer version in which he adds that their violence should decrease and that they should respect the law, and calls their departure another good solution. The Union des mosquées de France and the MRAP filed complaints over the interview, and on November 10, 2026, an investigating judge in Nanterre placed him under formal investigation for complicity in provocation to discrimination, hatred or violence.

Sources (4)

Disputed claim

Thibault de Montbrial

Houellebecq's 2022 remarks about Muslims contain no exhortation, even implicit, and therefore fall within freedom of opinion and expression.

What is disputed

Thibault de Montbrial and Louis Cailliez, Houellebecq's lawyers, made the argument after the investigating judge's decision, adding that a prophet of misfortune does not wish for misfortune. Najwa El Haïté, lawyer for the Union des mosquées de France, replied that freedom of expression is fundamental but cannot justify everything, and that it is now for the courts to assess the evidence.

Sources (2)

Response record

Responses

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

7 responses. First 6 shown initially. Newest first.

  1. Rikki SchlottNew York Post columnist, in an opinion column

    Before this statement

    Schlott writes that the courts should be full of assailants and arsonists but have turned instead to policing the interviews of public intellectuals, and that in France it seems a greater crime to criticize immigration or Islam than to destroy cities.

    "The man who defends his nation's spirit and integrity is treated as a greater threat than the man who burns that culture to the ground."
    Defended or excused

    Responding to: Houellebecq's 2022 remarks about Muslims contain no exhortation, even implicit, and therefore fall within freedom of opinion and expression.

    Full statement and sources

    In a New York Post column, Schlott calls the charge against Houellebecq an inversion of justice, describes his 2022 comments as criticism of Islam and concern about mass immigration, and says France should be ashamed of criminalizing the thoughts of a public intellectual.

    After the statement

    The sentence closes the column.

    Why this label?

    The reference point is Michel Houellebecq's November 2022 remarks about Muslims in Front Populaire, now under judicial investigation. Schlott treats the remarks as legitimate criticism of Islam and immigration and describes Houellebecq as a man who defends his nation's spirit, which defends them. She goes beyond disputing the incitement label, so challenges the characterization does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. Omar Youssef SouleimaneFrench-Syrian writer and journalist, in an opinion column in Le Figaro

    Before this statement

    Souleimane writes that Houellebecq had reworded his remarks and apologized but was placed under formal investigation all the same, and quotes the 2022 passage predicting attacks and shootings in mosques (translation).

    "It was a forecast, the vision of a future in which such violence would take place (Translated from French. Original: C'était une prospective, la vision d'un avenir où de telles violences auraient lieu)"
    Challenged the characterization

    Responding to: Houellebecq's 2022 remarks about Muslims contain no exhortation, even implicit, and therefore fall within freedom of opinion and expression.

    Full statement and sources

    In a Le Figaro column, Souleimane argues that Islamists in democracies have learned to fight critics in the courts, notes that Houellebecq had reworded his remarks and apologized, and describes the passage predicting attacks on mosques as a forecast of a possible future.

    After the statement

    The column then turns to the killing of Aboubakar Cissé, who was stabbed in April (translation).

    Why this label?

    The reference point is Michel Houellebecq's November 2022 remarks about Muslims in Front Populaire, now under judicial investigation. Souleimane describes the passage on attacks against Muslims as a forecast rather than the provocation the complaints allege, which challenges the characterization. He does not argue that the remarks about Muslims were justified, so defends or excuses does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  3. Mouvement contre le racisme et pour l'amitié entre les peuplesFrench anti-racism association and civil party in the case, commenting to Le Nouvel Obs

    Before this statement

    Le Nouvel Obs reports that the MRAP and the Union des mosquées de France remained civil parties after the Grande Mosquée de Paris dropped its complaint in January 2023.

    "We never considered that these explanations held up; withdrawing our complaint was never in question (Translated from French. Original: Nous n'avons jamais considéré que ces explications tenaient la route, il n'a jamais été question de retirer notre plainte)"
    Condemned

    Responding to: The wish of France's native-born population is not for Muslims to assimilate but for them to stop robbing and attacking them, or else, as another solution, for them to leave.

    Full statement and sources

    The MRAP, which kept its complaint after the Grande Mosquée de Paris dropped its own, says it never found Houellebecq's explanations convincing, and Le Nouvel Obs reports that it welcomed the decision to place him under formal investigation.

    After the statement

    Le Nouvel Obs reports that the MRAP welcomed the decision to place Houellebecq under formal investigation.

    Why this label?

    The reference point is Michel Houellebecq's November 2022 remarks about Muslims in Front Populaire, now under judicial investigation. The MRAP rejects the explanations Houellebecq gave for the remarks, maintains its criminal complaint over them and welcomes the investigation, which condemns them.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  4. Najwa El HaïtéLawyer for the Union des mosquées de France, a complainant in the case, speaking to AFP

    Before this statement

    AFP reports that Houellebecq's lawyers said the remarks contained no exhortation and fell within freedom of opinion and expression.

    "Freedom of expression is fundamental, but it cannot justify everything (Translated from French. Original: La liberté d'expression est fondamentale mais elle ne saurait tout justifier)"
    Condemned

    Responding to: Houellebecq's 2022 remarks about Muslims contain no exhortation, even implicit, and therefore fall within freedom of opinion and expression.

    Full statement and sources

    Responding to Houellebecq's lawyers, Najwa El Haïté, who represents the Union des mosquées de France, says freedom of expression cannot justify everything and that provocation to hatred, when established, is not part of the debate of ideas. She says it is now for the courts to assess the evidence, with respect for the presumption of innocence.

    After the statement

    She adds that provocation to hatred, when it is established, is not part of the debate of ideas, and that it is now for the courts to weigh the evidence while respecting the presumption of innocence (translation).

    Why this label?

    The reference point is Michel Houellebecq's November 2022 remarks about Muslims in Front Populaire, now under judicial investigation. Speaking for the federation whose complaint led to the investigation, El Haïté rejects the defense that the remarks are protected expression, which condemns them. She leaves the finding to the court and cites the presumption of innocence, but that is a legal caveat rather than a condition on her client's position, so mixed or conditional does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  5. Thibault de MontbrialLawyer for Michel Houellebecq, in a statement with his co-counsel Louis Cailliez to BFMTV and AFP

    Before this statement

    BFMTV reports that an investigating judge in Nanterre placed Houellebecq under formal investigation on November 10, 2026, and that the Union des mosquées de France had filed a complaint in Nanterre in January 2023.

    "Michel Houellebecq contests the criminal offense of which he is accused. The remarks at issue contain no element of exhortation, even implicit, and therefore fall within freedom of opinion and expression (Translated from French. Original: Michel Houellebecq conteste le délit pénal qui lui est reproché. Les propos incriminés ne contiennent pas de dimension d'exhortation, même implicite, et relèvent donc de la liberté d'opinion et d'expression)"
    Challenged the characterization

    Responding to: Houellebecq's 2022 remarks about Muslims contain no exhortation, even implicit, and therefore fall within freedom of opinion and expression.

    Full statement and sources

    Speaking for Houellebecq with his co-counsel Louis Cailliez, Thibault de Montbrial says the writer contests the offense, that the remarks contain no exhortation and belong to freedom of opinion and expression, and that a prophet of misfortune does not wish for misfortune.

    After the statement

    The lawyers add that a prophet of misfortune does not wish for misfortune, that his place is not in a courtroom, and that Houellebecq deplores the growing judicialization of intellectual debate (translation).

    Why this label?

    The reference point is Michel Houellebecq's November 2022 remarks about Muslims in Front Populaire, now under judicial investigation. His lawyers dispute that the remarks amount to incitement, saying they contain no exhortation and belong to free expression, which challenges the characterization. They do not argue that the content of the remarks was right, so defends or excuses does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  6. Grande Mosquée de ParisParis mosque and Muslim institution, in a statement signed by its rector, Chems-eddine Hafiz

    Before this statement

    Le HuffPost reports that the statement, announced on the mosque's X account on December 28, 2022, concerned a complaint to the Paris prosecutor for provocation to hatred against Muslims and called Houellebecq's remarks unacceptable and brutal.

    "they do not aim to shed light on any public debate but to stoke discriminatory speech, and acts (Translated from French. Original: elles ne visent pas à éclairer un quelconque débat public mais à attiser les discours discriminatoires, et les actes)"
    Condemned

    Responding to: The wish of France's native-born population is not for Muslims to assimilate but for them to stop robbing and attacking them, or else, as another solution, for them to leave.

    Full statement and sources

    Announcing a complaint to the Paris prosecutor for provocation to hatred against Muslims, the Grande Mosquée de Paris calls Houellebecq's remarks unacceptable and brutal and says they aim to stoke discriminatory speech and acts rather than inform public debate.

    After the statement

    The statement cites the passage in which Houellebecq predicts attacks and shootings in mosques and in cafes frequented by Muslims, and says that strict application of the law should now be sought.

    Why this label?

    The reference point is Michel Houellebecq's November 2022 remarks about Muslims in Front Populaire, now under judicial investigation. The Grande Mosquée de Paris says the remarks aim to stoke discriminatory speech and acts and files a complaint over them, which condemns them. It rejects the remarks themselves rather than only a description of them.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

View all 7 responsesShow fewer responses
  1. Front PopulaireMagazine that published the Houellebecq-Onfray conversation, in a post on its X account

    Before this statement

    Front Populaire announced its special issue built around the conversation between Houellebecq and Michel Onfray on November 16, 2022.

    "Those who claim that Michel #Houellebecq calls, in our special issue, for there to be "reverse Bataclans"... 1) cannot read OR 2) cannot read (Translated from French. Original: Ceux qui affirment que Michel #Houellebecq appelle, dans notre hors-série, à ce qu'il y ait des "Bataclan à l'envers"... 1) ne savent pas lire OU 2) ne savent pas lire)"
    Challenged the characterization

    Responding to: The wish of France's native-born population is not for Muslims to assimilate but for them to stop robbing and attacking them, or else, as another solution, for them to leave.

    Full statement and sources

    Front Populaire, which published the conversation, rejects the reading that Houellebecq called in its special issue for attacks on Muslims, and asks the journalists Jean-Michel Aphatie and Edwy Plenel where they stand.

    After the statement

    The post ends by tagging the journalists Jean-Michel Aphatie and Edwy Plenel and asking which of the two groups they belong to.

    Front Populaire's post on X about readings of Houellebecq's interview · Front PopulairePost on X, December 16, 2022, 12:33 p.m. CET

    Why this label?

    The reference point is Michel Houellebecq's November 2022 remarks about Muslims in Front Populaire, now under judicial investigation. The magazine disputes the interpretation that the remarks call for attacks on Muslims, which challenges the characterization. It does not argue that the remarks about Muslims were justified, so defends or excuses does not fit.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

Sources

(12)

Reporting

L'écrivain Michel Houellebecq mis en examen pour des propos hostiles envers les musulmans

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article

About this source

AFP report in French, published by France 24 and carried by Yahoo Actualités. It reports that an investigating judge in Nanterre placed Michel Houellebecq under formal investigation on November 10, 2026, quotes the November 2022 remark at issue, and carries statements from his lawyers, Thibault de Montbrial and Louis Cailliez, and from Najwa El Haïté, lawyer for the Union des mosquées de France.

Author
France 24 with AFP
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Une fédération de mosquées porte plainte contre Michel Houellebecq

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraph

About this source

La Croix report in French that the Union des mosquées de France filed a complaint against Michel Houellebecq on January 13, 2023, for provocation to discrimination, hatred or violence, according to its lawyer.

Author
La Croix
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original post

Front Populaire's post on X announcing its Houellebecq-Onfray special issue

About this source

Post on X by Front Populaire announcing a new special issue built around a conversation between Michel Houellebecq and Michel Onfray.

Author
Front Populaire
Published
Accessed

Original post

Front Populaire's post on X about readings of Houellebecq's interview

Front Populaire's post on X about readings of Houellebecq's interview (opens in a new tab) · Front PopulairePost on X, December 16, 2022, 12:33 p.m. CET

About this source

Post on X by Front Populaire answering people who said Michel Houellebecq had called, in its special issue, for attacks on Muslims. It tags the journalists Jean-Michel Aphatie and Edwy Plenel.

Author
Front Populaire
Published
Accessed

Reporting

Michel Houellebecq visé par une plainte de la grande mosquée de Paris

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article

About this source

Le HuffPost report in French on the Grande Mosquée de Paris complaint. It quotes the institution's statement and the passage of the interview it cited, and mentions Front Populaire's posts about its special issue.

Author
Le HuffPost
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original post

Grande Mosquée de Paris's post on X announcing its complaint against Michel Houellebecq

About this source

Post on X by the Grande Mosquée de Paris announcing a complaint against Michel Houellebecq over remarks about French Muslims in a recent written interview. The post attaches the institution's statement, signed by its rector, Chems-eddine Hafiz.

Author
Grande Mosquée de Paris
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Rikki Schlott's New York Post column on France criminalizing critics of Islam

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full column

About this source

Opinion column by Rikki Schlott in the New York Post. She argues that France should not prosecute Houellebecq over his 2022 interview and contrasts the case with the unrest in French cities that autumn.

Author
Rikki Schlott
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Omar Youssef Souleimane : « L'affaire Houellebecq montre que les islamistes veulent retourner la démocratie contre elle-même »

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs

About this source

Opinion column in French by the writer and journalist Omar Youssef Souleimane in Le Figaro's FigaroVox section. He argues that the case against Houellebecq shows Islamists using the courts against critics and describes the 2022 passage on attacks against Muslims as a forecast.

Author
Omar Youssef Souleimane
Published
Accessed

Reporting

Michel Houellebecq mis en examen pour des propos sur les musulmans et le «grand remplacement»

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article

About this source

Le Journal du Dimanche report in French. It quotes longer passages of the November 2022 interview, including the remark about Muslims leaving, the prediction of attacks on mosques and the comments on the great replacement theory, and gives the maximum penalty.

Author
Gautier Cruchaudet
Published
Accessed

Reporting

L'écrivain Michel Houellebecq mis en examen après des propos sur les musulmans et le «grand remplacement»

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs

About this source

Le Figaro report in French that first disclosed the formal investigation, citing a source close to the case. It says an investigating judge at the Nanterre court took the decision on November 10, 2026, after criminal complaints by the Union des mosquées de France and the MRAP, and that the rector of the Grande Mosquée de Paris dropped legal action after talking with Houellebecq in January 2023.

Author
Guillaume Poingt
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Michel Houellebecq mis en examen pour des propos hostiles aux musulmans

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article

About this source

BFMTV report in French, written with AFP. It gives the full wording of the charge, quotes two passages of the November 2022 interview, says the Union des mosquées de France filed its complaint in Nanterre in January 2023, and quotes Houellebecq's lawyers.

Author
Maxime Brandstaetter avec AFP
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Michel Houellebecq mis en examen quatre ans après des propos hostiles aux musulmans

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Full article

About this source

Le Nouvel Obs report in French. It summarizes the November 2022 remarks, the Grande Mosquée de Paris complaint and its withdrawal in January 2023, the complaints that the MRAP and the Union des mosquées de France kept, and comments from the MRAP, the federation's lawyer and Houellebecq's lawyers.

Author
Capucine Sansu
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

14 updates added in the last 7 days.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.

Share or embed this case

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the case page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Michel Houellebecq is placed under formal investigation over 2022 remarks about Muslims; his lawyers say the words fall within free expression
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/cases/michel-houellebecq-placed-under-formal-investigation-over-2022-remarks-about-muslims

The Dispute Index. "Michel Houellebecq is placed under formal investigation over 2022 remarks about Muslims; his lawyers say the words fall within free expression". First published: 2026-11-12. Last updated: 2026-11-12. https://disputeindex.com/cases/michel-houellebecq-placed-under-formal-investigation-over-2022-remarks-about-muslims