Rikki Schlott says France treats Houellebecq as a greater threat than rioters
Rikki SchlottNew York Post columnist, in an opinion column
In a New York Post column, Schlott calls the charge against Houellebecq an inversion of justice, describes his 2022 comments as criticism of Islam and concern about mass immigration, and says France should be ashamed of criminalizing the thoughts of a public intellectual.
Responding to
Houellebecq's 2022 remarks about Muslims contain no exhortation, even implicit, and therefore fall within freedom of opinion and expression.
“The man who defends his nation's spirit and integrity is treated as a greater threat than the man who burns that culture to the ground.”
Original text
Where this statement fits
Michel Houellebecq is placed under formal investigation over 2022 remarks about Muslims; his lawyers say the words fall within free expression
On November 10, 2026, an investigating judge at the Nanterre court, west of Paris, placed the novelist Michel Houellebecq under formal investigation (mis en examen) for complicity in provocation to discrimination, hatred or violence against a group because of its origin or religion, Le Figaro, AFP and BFMTV report, citing a source close to the case. A mise en examen is a step in a French judicial investigation, not a conviction. The case concerns remarks about Muslims in a conversation with the philosopher Michel Onfray, published in a special issue of Onfray's magazine Front Populaire in November 2022. AFP quotes Houellebecq as saying there that the wish of the native-born French population was not that Muslims assimilate but that they stop robbing and attacking them, or else that they leave. The Union des mosquées de France (UMF) and the anti-racism group MRAP filed the complaints behind the investigation. The Grande Mosquée de Paris filed one in December 2022 and dropped it in January 2023 after meeting the writer. His lawyers say the remarks contain no exhortation and fall within freedom of opinion and expression. The UMF's lawyer says freedom of expression is fundamental but cannot justify everything.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
Opinion column by Rikki Schlott in the New York Post. She argues that France should not prosecute Houellebecq over his 2022 interview and contrasts the case with the unrest in French cities that autumn.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Schlott writes that the courts should be full of assailants and arsonists but have turned instead to policing the interviews of public intellectuals, and that in France it seems a greater crime to criticize immigration or Islam than to destroy cities.
After the quotation
The sentence closes the column.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is Michel Houellebecq's November 2022 remarks about Muslims in Front Populaire, now under judicial investigation. Schlott treats the remarks as legitimate criticism of Islam and immigration and describes Houellebecq as a man who defends his nation's spirit, which defends them. She goes beyond disputing the incitement label, so challenges the characterization does not fit.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseOmar Youssef Souleimane calls the remarks a forecast and the case a use of the courts by Islamists
“It was a forecast, the vision of a future in which such violence would take place (Translated from French. Original: C'était une prospective, la vision d'un avenir où de telles violences auraient lieu)”Read statement
MRAP says it never accepted Houellebecq's explanations and kept its complaint
Mouvement contre le racisme et pour l'amitié entre les peuples
“We never considered that these explanations held up; withdrawing our complaint was never in question (Translated from French. Original: Nous n'avons jamais considéré que ces explications tenaient la route, il n'a jamais été question de retirer notre plainte)”Read statement
Lawyer for the Union des mosquées de France says free expression cannot justify everything
“Freedom of expression is fundamental, but it cannot justify everything (Translated from French. Original: La liberté d'expression est fondamentale mais elle ne saurait tout justifier)”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Rikki Schlott says France treats Houellebecq as a greater threat than rioters
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/8676-in-a-new-york-post-column-schlott-calls
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Rikki Schlott says France treats Houellebecq as a greater threat than rioters". First published: 2026-11-12. Last updated: 2026-11-12. https://disputeindex.com/events/8676-in-a-new-york-post-column-schlott-calls