All topics

Political Violence

Public disputes concerning politically motivated violence, threats, attacks, and claims about the causes or consequences of such violence.

Related cases

Case

Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

After an armed assailant attacked Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, Michigan, U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed condemned the attack and antisemitism but connected the assailant's actions to an Israeli airstrike that killed members of his family, describing violence as a cycle. Critics said the framing rationalized an antisemitic terrorist attack or shifted responsibility toward Israel and Jews. El-Sayed denied justifying the attack and later apologized for introducing context when the victims needed an unqualified condemnation.

Case

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

Haaretz reported that United Arab Emirates President Mohammed bin Zayed directly warned Benjamin Netanyahu about ten days before October 7, 2023 that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was preparing a major operation. Netanyahu and his office categorically deny that the reported call or warning occurred and say official record checks found no supporting documentation. Reporter Shlomi Eldar says he possesses documents, records, and confidential-source evidence supporting the account, but those materials have not been made public. Naftali Bennett says he knows the report is true; other opposition leaders demand an investigation. The UAE government has declined to confirm or deny the alleged conversation.

Statements

Ella Trubek

Role at the time: University of Texas at Austin student and Alpha Epsilon Phi chapter president, speaking in an interview

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"inviting him onto our campus has a real impact on how safe and supported our community feels."
Why we used this label

She explicitly objects to the cited rhetoric and its campus impact. This is a criticism linked to the American-Jews remarks, not an inferred position from her identity or a general campus invitation alone.

Jewish Insider interviews Ella Trubek about Piker's UT Austin invitation (opens in a new tab)Ella Trubek interview paragraphs immediately after the account of Jewish students, faculty and parents; second quoted paragraph.

Christine Hong

Role at the time: UC Santa Cruz professor and UC Ethnic Studies Council member, quoted email

Condemned

Responding to

Mosab Hassan Yousef’s call for Muslims to leave the United States at the Jewish American Summit

"his strategic silence, which amounts to sanctioning violence"
Why we used this label

The email directly criticizes Sures; the allegation remains attributed to Hong rather than adopted as a finding.

Robert Reich

Role at the time: Author and former labor secretary, personal essay

Defended or excused

Responding to

Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

"it’s clear he was merely trying to explain and give context for the violence."
Why we used this label

The essay directly rejects the central criticism of El-Sayed's framing; this is more specific than the accompanying electoral endorsement.

Chili Tropper

Role at the time: Member of the Knesset

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"It is difficult to know how events would have developed if Netanyahu had acted and the security establishment had received the information."
Why we used this label

His response criticizes the failure to transmit the alleged information but expressly avoids claiming that action would certainly have prevented the attack.

Yair Lapid

Role at the time: Israeli opposition politician and former prime minister

Condemned

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"Three weeks before the massacre, I warned the Prime Minister at a press conference that this was what was going to happen."
Why we used this label

He directly blamed Netanyahu for failing to act on multiple warnings and tied that failure to the attack’s occurrence.

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: United States representative, Meet the Press interview

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

"I think all of that is an irrelevant distraction."
Why we used this label

His answer minimizes the electoral focus on Piker but contains an explicit condemnation of Hamas, so it is not a Hamas endorsement or a refusal to answer.

Max Blumenthal

Role at the time: Journalist and editor, The Grayzone

Condemned

Responding to

Yousef's remarks and the audience applause constituted anti-Muslim hate and warranted an apology and repudiation from the summit and its sponsors.

"The Israeli Shin Bet tortured Mosab to the point that he now sounds like Hitler and looks like Herzl."
Why we used this label

Despite its own provocative wording, the comparison unmistakably condemns Yousef's rhetoric.

Andrew Kolvet

Role at the time: Turning Point USA spokesperson and political media host

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"Michigan CANNOT afford to elect a guy like Sayed."
Why we used this label

The authored post expressly endorsed criticism centered on El-Sayed's Temple Israel response and urged electoral rejection.

Cenk Uygur

Role at the time: Co-host and founder of The Young Turks

Defended or excused

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"condemns the synagogue attack. Of course, any person would, there's no question, and he did, there's no question about that."
Why we used this label

He treated causal explanation as legitimate and rejected the claim that El-Sayed's context negated his condemnation.

Ana Kasparian

Role at the time: Co-host of The Young Turks

Defended or excused

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"walk into a room full of people and apologize for something that he shouldn't have apologized for."
Why we used this label

She directly defended the substance of the original causal explanation and rejected the need for an apology.

Temple Israel

Role at the time: Clergy of Temple Israel, collectively

Explicitly stayed out

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"declined to comment"
Why we used this label

This is a documented refusal to comment on the apologies, not silence on the broader controversy; Rabbi Jen Lader had already criticized the original March framing.

Rabbi Asher Lopatin

Role at the time: Michigan rabbi and Jewish communal leader

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"nonapology apology"
Why we used this label

The criticism directly challenges the sufficiency and substance of the apology.

JD Vance

Role at the time: Vice president of the United States

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"A person who will apologize for a murderer so long as he looks the right way."
Why we used this label

This is a strong condemnation, but Vance's wording overstates El-Sayed's literal statement, which repeatedly condemned the attack.

Xochitl Hinojosa

Role at the time: Democratic strategist and commentator

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"He admitted he was wrong. He apologized."
Why we used this label

She emphasized corrective action without defending the original statement.

Jim Clyburn

Role at the time: United States representative

Defended or excused

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"I take him at his word. All of us deserve second chances."
Why we used this label

He treated the apology as credible and sufficient for political support.

Michael Horowitz

Role at the time: Michigan Democratic activist

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"insufficient"
Why we used this label

He treated the apology as inadequate and politically calculated rather than a sufficient correction.

David Kramer

Role at the time: Michigan Jewish Democratic organizer

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"The remarks were broadly well received, but there is never context for targeting preschoolers."
Why we used this label

The response combines approval of the outreach with a continuing substantive objection.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate nominee in Michigan

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"I made a mistake. It wasn't the time for context."
Why we used this label

He conceded timing, judgment, and harm but did not retract the underlying causal analysis.

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Interview subject and political livestreamer

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"Virtually all of my critics, ironically enough, have been saying the exact same thing that I’m saying."
Why we used this label

This is the subject’s own denial of the allegation and explanation of intended meaning, not independent corroboration.

Piker defiant as Democrats turn on him (opens in a new tab)Interview section addressing the August 20 remarks

Jonathan Chait

Role at the time: Political writer, The Atlantic

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording functioned as an implied threat against American Jews.

"a barely veiled anti-Semitic threat"
Why we used this label

The quoted phrase explicitly characterizes the remarks as both antisemitic and threatening.

Dov Waxman

Role at the time: Israel-studies professor, personal analysis

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"Jews are entitled to have an attachment to Israel."
Why we used this label

He agrees with the need to distinguish Jewish identity from Israel while explicitly separating his position from the safety condition he attributes to Piker.

Jon Ossoff

Role at the time: United States senator from Georgia

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"I unreservedly reject reckless and dangerous rhetoric suggesting that policy advocacy invites violence against the Jewish community or any community."
Why we used this label

Ossoff expressly rejects the framing as reckless and dangerous.

David Frum

Role at the time: Host, The David Frum Show; staff writer

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording functioned as an implied threat against American Jews.

"That’s a pretty contemptible offer. You’ll guarantee my physical safety if I submit?"
Why we used this label

The response treats the passage as a coercive implied threat rather than a neutral warning.

Mehdi Hasan

Role at the time: Journalist and commentator

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"He has neither ‘encouraged’ nor ‘justified’ violence against American Jews. Literally zero evidence for that."
Why we used this label

The post expressly denies the central characterization advanced by Brad Sherman.

Older statements

People with useful coverage

Ella Trubek

Ella Trubek is a University of Texas at Austin student and president of the university's Alpha Epsilon Phi chapter. Her campus leadership role is listed by the university's Office of the Dean of Students.

1 case and 1 statement

Christine Hong

Christine Hong is a professor of critical race and ethnic studies at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Her scholarship addresses race, militarism, and Asian American studies, and she participates in the UC Ethnic Studies Council.

1 case and 1 statement

Robert Reich

Robert Reich is an American author, public-policy scholar, and former United States secretary of labor. His writing and videos examine economic inequality, political power, and American government.

1 case and 1 statement

Chili Tropper

Israeli politician and member of the Knesset.

1 case and 1 statement

Yair Lapid

Israeli opposition politician and former prime minister.

1 case and 1 statement

Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin is a Democratic United States representative from Maryland and a constitutional-law scholar. He serves on the House Judiciary Committee and previously taught constitutional law.

1 case and 1 statement

Max Blumenthal

American journalist, editor of The Grayzone, and commentator on U.S. foreign policy and the Middle East.

1 case and 1 statement

Xochitl Hinojosa

Xochitl Hinojosa is a Democratic political strategist and commentator.

1 case and 1 statement

Rabbi Asher Lopatin

Asher Lopatin is a Michigan rabbi and Jewish communal leader.

1 case and 1 statement

JD Vance

JD Vance is the vice president of the United States and a former U.S. senator from Ohio. A Marine Corps veteran, he worked as a startup investor and wrote the memoir Hillbilly Elegy before his Senate election.

1 case and 1 statement

Andrew Kolvet

Andrew Kolvet is a political media host and spokesperson associated with Turning Point USA and The Charlie Kirk Show.

2 cases and 2 statements

Cenk Uygur

Progressive political commentator and co-founder and host of The Young Turks.

2 cases and 2 statements

More people