All topics

Israel

Public disputes concerning Israel, its government, institutions, policies, security, and international relations.

Related cases

Case

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Hasan Piker affirmed a hypothetical preference for Hamas over Israel through lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau disputed the moral comparison, while the ADL cited it as whitewashing terrorism. Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes and denied endorsing its domestic policies, while maintaining that Israeli occupation was the overriding concern.

Case

Abdul El-Sayed's cycle of violence framing after the Temple Israel attack

After an armed assailant attacked Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, Michigan, U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed condemned the attack and antisemitism but connected the assailant's actions to an Israeli airstrike that killed members of his family, describing violence as a cycle. Critics said the framing rationalized an antisemitic terrorist attack or shifted responsibility toward Israel and Jews. El-Sayed denied justifying the attack and later apologized for introducing context when the victims needed an unqualified condemnation.

Case

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

Haaretz reported that United Arab Emirates President Mohammed bin Zayed directly warned Benjamin Netanyahu about ten days before October 7, 2023 that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was preparing a major operation. Netanyahu and his office categorically deny that the reported call or warning occurred and say official record checks found no supporting documentation. Reporter Shlomi Eldar says he possesses documents, records, and confidential-source evidence supporting the account, but those materials have not been made public. Naftali Bennett says he knows the report is true; other opposition leaders demand an investigation. The UAE government has declined to confirm or deny the alleged conversation.

Statements

Micha Danzig

Role at the time: Attorney and commentator writing a signed personal opinion column

Condemned

Responding to

Did Mark Ruffalo’s Paramount–Warner criticism invoke antisemitic tropes?

"Paramount identified the trope correctly."
Why we used this label

Danzig expressly agrees with Paramount's criticism and rejects the supporting letter's defense of Ruffalo's framing.

Micha Danzig's September 10 criticism of Ruffalo and the supporting letter (opens in a new tab)Discussion of Ruffalo's August 21 post, the paragraph endorsing Paramount's response, and the subsequent discussion of the supporting letter.

Ella Trubek

Role at the time: University of Texas at Austin student and Alpha Epsilon Phi chapter president, speaking in an interview

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"inviting him onto our campus has a real impact on how safe and supported our community feels."
Why we used this label

She explicitly objects to the cited rhetoric and its campus impact. This is a criticism linked to the American-Jews remarks, not an inferred position from her identity or a general campus invitation alone.

Jewish Insider interviews Ella Trubek about Piker's UT Austin invitation (opens in a new tab)Ella Trubek interview paragraphs immediately after the account of Jewish students, faculty and parents; second quoted paragraph.

Dimitri Diliani

Role at the time: Fatah Reform Democratic faction spokesperson, statement to the Jerusalem Post

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"ludicrous and misleading"
Why we used this label

The statement contests the alleged provenance and political purpose of the report, not independently whether the UAE warning occurred.

Haaretz

Role at the time: Haaretz institutional legal response, public announcement headline

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"Won't Hesitate to Expose the Truth in Court"
Why we used this label

This is the newspaper's own response to a claim that its report is false, not routine news reporting assigned to the outlet as a stance.

Prime Minister’s Office of Israel

Role at the time: Official office of the prime minister of Israel

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

The Prime Minister’s Office says its review of Netanyahu’s call log and office visitor records found no documentation supporting the reported call or an Emirati representative’s visit.

"A thorough examination of the Prime Minister’s call log does not show any supporting entry."
Why we used this label

The office offers a specific record-based challenge to the alleged call. The record review is the office’s assertion and has not been independently audited in the available sources.

Benjamin Netanyahu

Role at the time: Prime minister of Israel and Likud leader

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

No call between Netanyahu and Mohammed bin Zayed occurred during the relevant period, and Netanyahu received no UAE warning before October 7.

"This is a sinister libel with clear political timing."
Why we used this label

He disputes the report’s truth and provenance. The statement is not coded as a defense of his alleged conduct because he denies the underlying event.

Shlomi Eldar

Role at the time: Co-author of the Haaretz investigation and related book

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Shlomi Eldar says he possesses documents, records, and confidential-source evidence showing that Mohammed bin Zayed called Netanyahu and delivered the reported warning.

"I have the document, I have records, I have everything that shows that the president of UAE called Netanyahu."
Why we used this label

The statement directly challenges the government’s characterization of the report as fabricated. It establishes Eldar’s attributable evidentiary claim but does not make the underlying materials public.

Mark Levin

Role at the time: Conservative radio and podcast host

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"This is a well-timed, well organized political ambush."
Why we used this label

He directly challenged the report’s credibility and framed its publication and amplification as political manipulation.

Amit Becher

Role at the time: Head of the Israel Bar Association

Condemned

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"Netanyahu must be investigated for his role in the failure and disaster of October 7."
Why we used this label

He expressly demanded an investigation of Netanyahu’s role in the failure.

Chili Tropper

Role at the time: Member of the Knesset

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"It is difficult to know how events would have developed if Netanyahu had acted and the security establishment had received the information."
Why we used this label

His response criticizes the failure to transmit the alleged information but expressly avoids claiming that action would certainly have prevented the attack.

Avigdor Lieberman

Role at the time: Yisrael Beytenu leader and Israeli opposition politician

Condemned

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"The shocking revelations this morning demand an immediate and thorough investigation."
Why we used this label

The joint statement treated the report as evidence of serious failure and said Netanyahu and his allies were unfit to remain in office.

Yair Lapid

Role at the time: Israeli opposition politician and former prime minister

Condemned

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"Three weeks before the massacre, I warned the Prime Minister at a press conference that this was what was going to happen."
Why we used this label

He directly blamed Netanyahu for failing to act on multiple warnings and tied that failure to the attack’s occurrence.

Yaron Brook

Role at the time: Podcaster and political commentator

Condemned

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"Netanyahu has to go regardless of how this specific allegation shakes out."
Why we used this label

Brook reaches an unqualified conclusion that Netanyahu should leave office and expressly says it does not depend on the allegation's final resolution.

Naftali Bennett

Role at the time: Former prime minister of Israel and B’Yachad party leader

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Naftali Bennett said the report that Netanyahu was warned ten days before October 7 about Yahya Sinwar’s intentions was true, without publicly explaining the basis for that assertion.

"“The report published this morning that Netanyahu was warned 10 days before the October 7 massacre about Sinwar’s intentions is true.”"
Why we used this label

Bennett directly disputed the Prime Minister’s Office’s categorical denial; the quoted statement asserts the report’s core allegation without publicly supplying his evidentiary basis.

United Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Role at the time: Official foreign ministry of the United Arab Emirates

Explicitly stayed out

Responding to

Mohammed bin Zayed directly warned Benjamin Netanyahu in late September 2023 that Yahya Sinwar was preparing a major Hamas operation that could cause bloodshed and destabilize the region.

"The Ministry does not comment on media stories or speculation regarding conversations between government leaders."
Why we used this label

The ministry expressly declined to address the reported leaders’ conversation; its general statement about intelligence channels is not a confirmation or denial.

Yair Golan

Role at the time: Leader of The Democrats party

Condemned

Responding to

If Netanyahu received the reported warning and failed to alert security leaders or take action, that failure constituted extraordinary or criminal negligence.

"He knew. He was warned."
Why we used this label

The statement unconditionally accepts the warning characterization and condemns Netanyahu’s alleged conduct.

Gadi Eisenkot

Role at the time: Former IDF chief of staff and Yashar party leader

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

If Netanyahu received the reported warning and failed to alert security leaders or take action, that failure constituted extraordinary or criminal negligence.

"If the publication is true, it represents a serious breach of public trust."
Why we used this label

His response combines categorical political criticism with an explicit condition concerning the truth of the newly reported call.

Naftali Bennett

Role at the time: Former prime minister and B’Yachad party leader

Condemned

Responding to

If Netanyahu received the reported warning and failed to alert security leaders or take action, that failure constituted extraordinary or criminal negligence.

"Netanyahu bears personal and direct responsibility for the failure."
Why we used this label

Bennett accepts the reported warning as true and assigns direct personal responsibility rather than merely requesting verification.

Jamie Raskin

Role at the time: United States representative, Meet the Press interview

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

"I think all of that is an irrelevant distraction."
Why we used this label

His answer minimizes the electoral focus on Piker but contains an explicit condemnation of Hamas, so it is not a Hamas endorsement or a refusal to answer.

Anti-Defamation League

Role at the time: Institutional statement by an antisemitism advocacy organization

Condemned

Responding to

Macklemore’s set subjected Sheeran’s audience to performative, biased, and hostile anti-Israel activism.

"They came for a concert, not performative, biased and hateful anti-Israel “activism” from his opener, Macklemore."
Why we used this label

The statement directly rejects the performance’s content and its use of the concert setting.

Israeli-American Council

Role at the time: Institutional petition by an Israeli-American advocacy organization

Condemned

Responding to

An opening act should not use a headliner’s global concert platform to advance a one-sided political agenda without accountability and clear boundaries.

"This was an Ed Sheeran concert—not a political rally, not a protest, and not an activist event."
Why we used this label

The petition directly rejects the appropriateness of the performance and requests concrete remedial action.

StopAntisemitism

Role at the time: Institutional social-media statement by an advocacy organization

Condemned

Responding to

Macklemore’s set subjected Sheeran’s audience to performative, biased, and hostile anti-Israel activism.

"Jewish patrons should not be subjected to this propaganda."
Why we used this label

The statement directly rejects the performance and identifies the audience harm the organization says it caused.

Macklemore

Role at the time: Recording artist and opening act on Ed Sheeran’s Loop Tour

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Macklemore’s MetLife message was a demand for Palestinian freedom and equal human dignity, not criticism of Jewish people.

"Criticism of Israel, criticism of apartheid, being against genocide in no way is a criticism of you."
Why we used this label

The statement directly disputes a central characterization while maintaining the underlying criticism of Israel.

Avi Issacharoff

Role at the time: Journalist and Fauda co-creator

Condemned

Responding to

A United Nations commission concluded that Israeli authorities committed genocide in Gaza.

"There are some people that are ignorant, there are some people that are stupid. He's a rare combination of those two."
Why we used this label

He expressly rejected and condemned Ruffalo's characterization, focusing on the genocide claim.

Older statements

People with useful coverage

Safra Catz

Chief executive officer of Oracle and a director of Paramount Skydance.

1 case

Hasan Piker

Hasan Piker, also known as HasanAbi, is a political livestreamer and commentator.

2 cases and 2 statements

Noah Rothman

Senior writer at National Review and political commentator.

1 case and 1 statement

Josh Gottheimer

United States representative for New Jersey's 5th congressional district.

1 case and 1 statement

Van Jones

Van Jones is an author, commentator, producer and social entrepreneur. His projects include the nonprofit Dream Machine and the production company Magic Labs Media. His writing addresses politics, criminal justice, artificial intelligence and cooperation across political and social divides.

1 case and 1 statement

Jon Favreau

Former White House speechwriter, political commentator, and co-host of Pod Save America.

1 case and 1 statement

Rabbi Jen Lader

Jen Lader is a rabbi associated with Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, Michigan.

1 case and 1 statement

Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed is a physician, former Detroit health director, and 2026 Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan.

1 case and 1 statement