All topics

2026 Midterm Elections

Public disputes concerning the 2026 U.S. midterm election cycle, including campaigns, candidates, conventions, advertising, endorsements, and election-related policy promises.

Related cases

Case

Trump’s $5,000 election pledge: policy dividend or vote-buying?

At the Republican midterm convention in Dallas on September 9, 2026, Donald Trump promised $5,000 for each adult American citizen if Republicans retained both the House and Senate. Supporters presented the proposed dividend as a way to share economic gains; critics called the election condition an improper inducement or questioned whether tariff revenue could finance it. Other responses raised narrower questions about timing, cost and whether a broad policy promise amounts to illegal vote-buying.

Case

Was John Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance bipartisanship or political betrayal?

At the September 9, 2026 Republican midterm convention, Democratic Senator John Fetterman introduced Republican Senator Dave McCormick by video and promised to cooperate with President Trump on Pennsylvania steel. Supporters welcomed cross-party cooperation; critics said the campaign-stage appearance helped an administration his voters expected him to oppose. Fetterman subsequently reaffirmed his Democratic identity.

Case

Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

Laura Loomer described Florida Democratic Senate nominee Angie Nixon and four other prominent Black women using the word “ghetto” and a gendered slur, said the stereotype exists, and later defended the wording as an accurate description of Nixon’s conduct, race, and ideology. Nixon and political figures and commentators across party lines called the remarks racist, sexist, degrading, offensive, or vile. The dispute concerns whether Loomer’s stated political criticism can be separated from the racial and gender stereotypes used in the original and follow-up statements.

More cases

Statements

Jake Shields

Role at the time: Mixed martial artist and commentator, on his own X account

Condemned

Responding to

Trump promised a $5,000 payment to each adult American citizen if Republicans retained both the House and Senate in the 2026 midterms.

"Imagine being stupid enough to believe this"
Why we used this label

Explicitly disparages believing the promise. The criticism is about credibility, not a stated legal or fiscal analysis.

Evan Kilgore

Role at the time: Political commentator, on his own X account

Condemned

Responding to

Trump promised a $5,000 payment to each adult American citizen if Republicans retained both the House and Senate in the 2026 midterms.

"they're paying people with our own taxpayer money to vote for them... Sounds like communism..."
Why we used this label

Expressly criticizes the funding-and-election arrangement. His comparison to communism is recorded as his rhetoric, not the dossier’s description.

Catherine Rampell

Role at the time: Economics journalist commenting on her own X account

Condemned

Responding to

Trump’s $5,000 election pledge: policy dividend or vote-buying?

"no checks have been issued"
Why we used this label

The post presents a negative assessment of the pledge's credibility, not a legal conclusion about vote-buying.

Sam Stein

Role at the time: Political journalist, speaking on his personal X account

Condemned

Responding to

Trump promised a $5,000 payment to each adult American citizen if Republicans retained both the House and Senate in the 2026 midterms.

"trump openly bribing people to vote for republicans."
Why we used this label

Expressly criticizes the pledge and labels it bribery; the record attributes that characterization rather than concluding that an election law was violated.

Brendan Boyle

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. representative commenting through his congressional-branded account

Condemned

Responding to

Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance failed the Pennsylvanians who elected him to oppose the Trump administration.

"Trump’s favorite Democrat"
Why we used this label

Expressly connects a critical characterization to that night's act.

Malcolm Kenyatta

Role at the time: Pennsylvania state representative commenting on X

Condemned

Responding to

Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance failed the Pennsylvanians who elected him to oppose the Trump administration.

"John is Benedict Arnold, but lazy."
Why we used this label

An explicit adverse interpretation of the convention appearance, not an inference from his party affiliation.

National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare

Role at the time: National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, through its official X account

Condemned

Responding to

Did Jon Ossoff’s Social Security ad fairly represent Mike Collins’s radio interview?

"GOP Rep. Mike Collins wants to end Social Security."
Why we used this label

The organization criticizes Collins by adopting the interpretation of his policy position disputed in this case.

NCPSSM links its Ossoff endorsement to a disputed claim about Collins and Social Security (opens in a new tab) - National Committee to Preserve Social Security and MedicareOriginal post or statement body

Tré Easton

Role at the time: Former Fetterman legislative aide speaking to NBC News in his own capacity

Condemned

Responding to

Fetterman's GOP-convention appearance failed the Pennsylvanians who elected him to oppose the Trump administration.

"to see it executed at this scale is really stunning"
Why we used this label

Direct criticism of this appearance's conduct and political judgment.

Rabbi Aaron Starr

Role at the time: Rabbi, Congregation Shaarey Zedek

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"really only a partial apology"
Why we used this label

He explicitly regarded the apology as incomplete.

Travis Akers

Role at the time: Political commentator, educator, and retired Navy officer speaking personally

Condemned

Responding to

Laura Loomer’s remarks about Angie Nixon and other Black women in politics

"deeply racist insults"
Why we used this label

He directly characterizes the disputed attacks as racist while expressing support for their target.

Ro Khanna

Role at the time: United States representative

Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"Now Laura Loomer is attacking her with virulent racism."
Why we used this label

Explicit condemnation by an elected official.

Andrew Kolvet

Role at the time: Turning Point USA spokesperson and political media host

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"Michigan CANNOT afford to elect a guy like Sayed."
Why we used this label

The authored post expressly endorsed criticism centered on El-Sayed's Temple Israel response and urged electoral rejection.

Rashida Tlaib

Role at the time: United States representative

Condemned

Responding to

The absence of comparable Republican condemnation reflects a political double standard in reactions to inflammatory online figures.

"I’m going to check to see if you said anything about Laura Loomer calling a Black woman running for Senate…"
Why we used this label

The statement treats Loomer’s conduct as condemnable and principally advances a consistency argument.

Angie Nixon

Role at the time: Target of the remarks and Florida Democratic Senate nominee

Condemned

Responding to

Loomer’s remarks about Nixon and the other women were racist and misogynistic stereotyping rather than legitimate political criticism.

"While Loomer throws racist tantrums, Floridians are struggling to afford groceries, housing, healthcare, and childcare."
Why we used this label

The target expressly applies the term racist to Loomer’s attacks.

JD Vance

Role at the time: Vice president of the United States

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"A person who will apologize for a murderer so long as he looks the right way."
Why we used this label

This is a strong condemnation, but Vance's wording overstates El-Sayed's literal statement, which repeatedly condemned the attack.

Dana Nessel

Role at the time: Michigan attorney general

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"making excuses for an attempted mass killing of children"
Why we used this label

This is direct Democratic criticism grounded in the impact of the framing on the targeted community.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate and former Wayne County health director

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"Antisemitism is a scourge, and we need to address it in all its forms."
Why we used this label

El-Sayed condemns antisemitism and rejects rhetoric that endangers the Jewish community.

Donald Trump

Role at the time: President of the United States

Condemned

Responding to

Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp

"He’s a Pee-wee Herman lookalike."
Why we used this label

Trumps insult directly attacks Ossoff in the dispute.

Jon Ossoff

Role at the time: United States senator and reelection candidate

Condemned

Responding to

Jon Ossoff’s travel with Natalie remark about Donald Trump and Natalie Harp

"He doesn’t want to do the job. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar."
Why we used this label

Ossoffs statement directly criticizes Trump conduct and the reported travel arrangement.

Scandal piñata — Jon Ossoff Atlanta rally transcript (opens in a new tab)Paragraph beginning “He doesn’t want to do the job”

Jon Ossoff

Role at the time: United States senator from Georgia and Democratic candidate for reelection

Condemned

Responding to

Did Mike Collins support compensation for January 6 defendants?

"“Congressman Collins needs to immediately come out and publicly retract his support for these taxpayer-funded payouts to violent insurrectionists.”"
Why we used this label

Ossoff directly characterizes Collins’s answer as endorsement of payments to violent insurrectionists and calls it unacceptable.

Ossoff campaign calls on Collins to retract January 6 compensation support (opens in a new tab)August 12, 2026 press release and linked virtual press conference

Scott Jennings

Role at the time: Republican political strategist and CNN political commentator

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"That's how you would justify any and all political violence. That is a dangerous mindset."
Why we used this label

The statement directly rejects the explanation-versus-justification distinction at the center of the dispute.

Jon Ossoff

Role at the time: Jon Ossoff U.S. Senate campaign

Condemned

Responding to

Did Jon Ossoff’s Social Security ad fairly represent Mike Collins’s radio interview?

"“He wants to push you off Social Security.”"
Why we used this label

The campaign uses the excerpt to make a critical policy characterization of Collins’s position on Social Security.

Tim Miller

Role at the time: Host of The Bulwark Podcast

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"Anyone who would think a statement condemning a terorrist attack on a synagogue is a 'risk' is insane and should be fired from the campaign."
Why we used this label

The authored post directly rejects the political hesitation surrounding condemnation of the attack.

Mike Rogers

Role at the time: Republican U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"If you're having a moral crisis over whether to condemn terrorism, you're unfit for office."
Why we used this label

The statement treats El-Sayed's contextualization as disqualifying sympathy for the assailant.

People with useful coverage

Erica York

Erica York is a senior economist at the Tax Foundation, where she researches federal tax policy. She has also taught at Sterling College and holds a master's degree in economics from Wichita State University.

1 case and 1 statement

Jake Shields

Jake Shields is an American former mixed martial arts fighter who competed in the UFC. He hosts Fight Back with Jake Shields, an interview podcast covering combat sports, politics, and current affairs.

1 case and 1 statement

Reem Ibrahim

Reem Ibrahim is a writer, broadcaster, and research fellow in policy and media at Reason, covering regulation, trade, and economic freedom. She previously worked at the Institute of Economic Affairs in London and is a graduate of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

1 case and 1 statement

Evan Kilgore

Evan Kilgore is an American conservative commentator and social media personality. His commentary addresses United States politics, religion, and national identity, and he describes himself publicly as an American exceptionalist.

1 case and 1 statement

Bernie Moreno

Bernie Moreno is a Republican U.S. senator representing Ohio, serving in the Senate since 2025. Before entering elected office, he operated automobile dealerships in Ohio and co-founded CHAMP Titles, a company that develops digital vehicle-title systems.

1 case and 1 statement

Catherine Rampell

Catherine Rampell is an economics journalist and commentator, economics editor at The Bulwark, and an anchor at MS NOW. Her work focuses on economics, politics, public policy, and immigration. She previously wrote an opinion column for The Washington Post and reported for The New York Times and PBS NewsHour.

1 case and 1 statement

Sam Stein

Sam Stein is a political journalist and managing editor at The Bulwark. He previously served as politics editor at The Daily Beast and oversaw White House and campaign reporting at Politico, after beginning his journalism career at HuffPost.

1 case and 1 statement

Brendan Boyle

Democratic U.S. representative from Pennsylvania.

1 case and 1 statement

John Day

John Day is a New Mexico-based attorney who provides legal analysis in Associated Press reporting.

1 case and 1 statement

Marc Goldwein

Marc Goldwein is senior vice president and senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, where his work focuses on fiscal policy and the federal budget. He also teaches economics at Johns Hopkins University and the University of California's Washington program.

1 case and 1 statement

Malcolm Kenyatta

Democratic member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives.

1 case and 1 statement

Joyce Haas

Pennsylvania Republican political organizer who has served as vice chair of the state party.

1 case and 1 statement

More people