Nathan Johnson

Democratic member of the Texas State Senate for District 16 (Dallas) since January 2019, a lawyer and mediator, and the Democratic nominee for Texas Attorney General in the November 2026 election.

Statements by Nathan Johnson

Nathan Johnson

Role at the time: 2026 Democratic candidate for Texas attorney general

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Nathan Johnson said Flock cameras can help police but called for slowing deployment until Texas has stronger legal controls over access and sharing.

“I don't think that they have been deployed responsibly.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Texas attorney general candidates discuss Flock cameras and privacyCandidate interviews with Nathan Johnson and Mayes Middleton
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Johnson said the cameras have not been deployed responsibly and called for slowing deployment until Texas has stronger legal controls over access and sharing. Allowing the cameras after a pause and with controls fits Mixed or conditional.

Nathan Johnson

Role at the time: Texas state senator (District 16) and Democratic nominee for attorney general

Condemned

Response to this claim

Tarrant County commissioners' reduction of 2026 polling places was an attempt to rig the election.

“We have not heard a remotely convincing argument that this reduction of polling locations serves any purpose other than to make it more difficult to vote. While County officials say this saves resources, to close polling places seven weeks out from a midterm election, in the county where voter participation is surging, does not read as a budget decision.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Statement: Attorney General Nominee Nathan Johnson on Tarrant County Commissioners' Vote to Close Polling Locations · Nathan JohnsonPress release dated September 2, 2026; statement attributed to Sen. Nathan Johnson
Why we used this label

Johnson rejects the cost rationale and says the only apparent purpose is to make voting harder, which condemns the decision and attributes an improper purpose that remains contested.

Topics in this coverage