Case
Do they support the war in Iran?
An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

United States Representative and Democratic candidate for U.S. House in California's 44th district.
Case
An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.
Case
DOJ has expanded its pursuit of citizenship revocation. Officials defend the campaign as correcting unlawful naturalization, while congressional critics question its broad discretion and the safeguards against political targeting.
Role at the time: U.S. Representative, California 44th district
Statement summary
Nanette Diaz Barragán voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.
Role at the time: U.S. Representative for California at the statement date.
Statement summary
Barragán criticizes the military action as unconstitutional and calls for Congress to return immediately to debate and vote.
“which I believe ignores and tramples on the Constitution”
The case concerns U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war. Barragán criticizes the military action as unconstitutional and calls for Congress to return immediately to debate and vote.
Role at the time: Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
Statement summary
Nanette Barragan signed the congressional letter criticizing DOJ's broad denaturalization priorities and requesting safeguards.
“Action: Signed the July 31, 2025 congressional letter challenging DOJ's expanded denaturalization priorities. Signature appears on page 5.”
Signing the letter expresses criticism of the expanded campaign under scrutiny. Acceptance of rigorous revocation proceedings in grave fraud cases does not make the letter's criticism of this directive conditional.
Statement dates: February 28, 2026 to September 15, 2026
Statement dates: July 31, 2025
Statement dates: February 28, 2026 to September 15, 2026
Statement dates: July 31, 2025
Statement dates: February 28, 2026 to September 15, 2026