Michele Tafoya

Portrait of Michele Tafoya
Gage SkidmoreSourceCC BY-SA 2.0Existing portrait crop retained; resized only. Image reused under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Minnesota.

What we have documented

We have documented 6 statements by Michele Tafoya, in 3 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow "Michele Tafoya’s accusation that Peggy Flanagan is “hiding from” Minnesota’s welfare-fraud scandal" and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Michele Tafoya

Portrait of Michele Tafoya

Michele Tafoya

Role at the time: Republican U.S. Senate nominee in Minnesota

Condemned

Statement summary

Tafoya says Flanagan and Walz must answer for fraud continuing under their administration. She alleges either complicity or ignorance; the post does not establish either claim.

“Peggy Flanagan and Tim Walz are either complicit or they are clueless.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Tafoya says Flanagan and Walz must answer for continuing fraudOriginal post text and October 30 timestamp.
Why we used this label

The reference is Flanagan's responsibility for the fraud response. Tafoya explicitly criticizes her leadership.

Portrait of Michele Tafoya

Michele Tafoya

Role at the time: Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, in an MPR News debate

Explicitly stayed out

Statement summary

Asked in an MPR News debate to assess Hegseth's performance, Tafoya said his grade is incomplete. She said she was glad the president had canceled the planned online broadcast of an execution, and she did not give a view on impeachment.

“We have an incomplete grade right now. ... One thing I'm happy to see is that the President of the United States canceled this online viewing of this death penalty case in Texas. I'm happy to see that. I think the grade is incomplete.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)MPR News Politics Friday: Flanagan and Tafoya U.S. Senate debate · MPR NewsDebate audio, 10:52 to 11:57 (question on Pete Hegseth)
Why we used this label

The question in this case is whether the House should impeach Hegseth. Asked to grade him with the impeachment resolution in view, Tafoya declines to give a grade, calling it incomplete, and takes no position on impeachment. Her one judgment is approval of the canceled livestream.

Portrait of Michele Tafoya

Michele Tafoya

Role at the time: Republican U.S. Senate nominee in Minnesota

Condemned

Statement summary

Tafoya argues that fraud and other failures during the Walz-Flanagan administration disqualify Flanagan from promotion to the Senate.

“You're her boss. You pay her. I think she deserves a pink slip.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Minnesota U.S. Senate Debate: Peggy Flanagan vs. Michele Tafoya20:36-26:34 fraud and oversight exchange; closing statements
Why we used this label

Relative to Flanagan's conduct in the administration, Tafoya expressly condemns her record and asks voters to reject her Senate candidacy.

Portrait of Michele Tafoya

Michele Tafoya

Role at the time: Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, posting on her own X account

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Michele Tafoya said Peggy Flanagan's longtime friend runs the Milestone Development Center, asserted that the center is under investigation for fraud, and said children with autism "are not a slush fund."

“This is Peggy Flanagan and her best friend of 25 years. That friend runs the Milestone Development Center. It’s now under investigation for fraud. Kids with autism are not a slush fund. Minnesotans deserve so much better.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Michele Tafoya (@Michele_Tafoya) on X: “This is Peggy Flanagan and her best friend of 25 years.”Full post text, published September 22, 2026 at 6:34 p.m. EDT.
Why we used this label

Relative to the case-level accusation that Flanagan hid from or enabled Minnesota welfare fraud, Tafoya expands and presses that accusation by linking Flanagan to a longtime friend and asserting the friend's center is under investigation. She presents the allegation as fact and does not qualify it, so this defends or presses the accusation rather than merely reporting it.

Portrait of Michele Tafoya

Michele Tafoya

Role at the time: Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, posting on her own X account

Defended or excused

Statement summary

In a post on her campaign X account, Michele Tafoya said her opponent, Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, “is hiding from the fraud” in Minnesota’s Feeding Our Future scandal and “let it happen.” She said Minnesotans “have noticed,” pointing to polling showing the Senate race as “a statistical tie,” and said “people are done making excuses for their leaders.”

“Peggy Flanagan is hiding from the fraud. She let it happen. Minnesotans have noticed. That’s why this race is a statistical tie. I’ve been in every corner of this state, and I keep hearing the same thing: people are done making excuses for their leaders.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Michele Tafoya (@Michele_Tafoya) on X: “Peggy Flanagan is hiding from the fraud. She let it happen.”Post text.
Why we used this label

Tafoya makes the accusation herself and presents it as settled fact (“she let it happen”), and argues that Minnesota voters are responding to it. That defends and presses the accusation rather than merely reporting it. The closest competing label is “Mixed or conditional”; it loses because Tafoya states the accusation without qualification or condition.

Portrait of Michele Tafoya

Michele Tafoya

Role at the time: Republican candidate for U.S. Senate, Minnesota

Defended or excused

Statement summary

On the Todd Starnes Radio Show, Michele Tafoya acknowledged the Iran war's rising gas prices are "hard" but urged Americans to support the war effort, suggesting they skip Starbucks trips until prices come down.

“Maybe you take one less trip to Starbucks, and so that gas goes a little further, until this thing is over and these gas prices come back down again. Let's just try to be patriots about this. Whether you agree with it or not, we're there and we've got to support our men and women in uniform. That's a big one.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)MAGA Candidate Roasted for Telling Americans to Cut Starbucks to Support Trump's War
Why we used this label

Tafoya asked voters to endure the war's costs and back the effort, saying "we're there and we've got to support" it, defending continued U.S. involvement.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage