Max Isaacs

Max Isaacs is director of technology law and policy at the Policing Project at NYU School of Law. His work focuses on emerging policing technologies and civil rights. Before joining the project, he clerked for two federal judges and was a civil rights fellow at Lambda Legal. He earned a music degree at Purchase College Conservatory and a law degree at NYU School of Law, where he was on the Law Review. His clerkships were with Fourth Circuit Judge Diana Gribbon Motz and Southern District of New York Judge Lorna Schofield.

What we have documented

We have documented 2 statements by Max Isaacs, in 2 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Max Isaacs

Max Isaacs

Role at the time: NYU Policing Project director of technology law and policy

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Isaacs calls Minnesota's warrant requirement a promising model and says strong regulation is possible.

“I think you can look at a jurisdiction like Minnesota as a really promising model and proof that strong regulation is possible.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Max Isaacs calls for stronger regulation of Flock and ALPR camerasMax Isaacs responses
Why we used this label

Isaacs endorses requiring probable cause and a warrant before license-plate tracking. This is a conditional position on how the surveillance may operate.

Max Isaacs

Role at the time: NYU Policing Project director of technology law and policy

Mixed or conditional

Response to this claim

Flock's August 2026 safeguards meaningfully address privacy and misuse concerns about its license-plate reader network.

“this kind of safeguard should be required by law”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Washington Post interviews on Flock's August safeguardsMax Isaacs and Marci Bakely interview passages
Why we used this label

The August package is at issue. Isaacs sees a useful change but says company policy and an unproven audit tool are insufficient.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage