Isaacs backs a warrant-based model for license-plate tracking

Max IsaacsNYU Policing Project director of technology law and policy

Mixed or conditional

Isaacs calls Minnesota's warrant requirement a promising model and says strong regulation is possible.

“I think you can look at a jurisdiction like Minnesota as a really promising model and proof that strong regulation is possible.”

Interview

Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Max Isaacs calls for stronger regulation of Flock and ALPR camerasMax Isaacs responses

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Interview

Max Isaacs calls for stronger regulation of Flock and ALPR cameras (opens in a new tab)Max Isaacs responses

About this source

NYU Law interviews Policing Project researchers about regulating automated license-plate readers, including warrants, limits on watchlists and legislative safeguards.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Asked about adapting existing laws to regulate license-plate cameras, Isaacs cites wiretapping laws and describes a warrant requirement in Minnesota.

After the quotation

Friedman says the Policing Project has written model legislation that other jurisdictions could adopt.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Isaacs endorses requiring probable cause and a warrant before license-plate tracking. This is a conditional position on how the surveillance may operate.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Max Isaacs, Isaacs backs a warrant-based model for license-plate trackingDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Isaacs backs a warrant-based model for license-plate tracking
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5953-isaacs-calls-minnesota-s-warrant-requirement-a-promising

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Isaacs backs a warrant-based model for license-plate tracking". First published: 2026-10-17. Last updated: 2026-10-17. https://disputeindex.com/events/5953-isaacs-calls-minnesota-s-warrant-requirement-a-promising