Jennifer McClellan

Portrait of Jennifer McClellan
U.S. House of Representatives

United States Representative and Democratic candidate for U.S. House in Virginia's 4th district.

Democratic candidate for U.S. House in Virginia's 4th Congressional District (2026)

What we have documented

We have documented 3 statements by Jennifer McClellan, in 2 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Hear if a candidate's Iran war stance changes

Get an email if Congress votes again on war powers, or if a member of Congress or a candidate takes a new public position on the Iran war.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Jennifer McClellan

Portrait of Jennifer McClellan

Jennifer McClellan

Role at the time: U.S. representative (D) for Virginia's 4th District, running for reelection

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Rep. Jennifer McClellan said technology like Flock can be a useful tool in legitimate investigations but should be carefully reviewed, with significant public input, before implementation, and that any use must follow the Fourth Amendment.

“As a policy maker, I strive to keep communities safe without violating the civil rights and liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution. While technology can be a useful tool in legitimate law enforcement investigations, including counterterrorism and human trafficking, technologies like Flock collect significant amounts of information and should be carefully reviewed, with significant public input, before implementation. Any use of these types of technologies must adhere to our constitutional principles and protections, including the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)4th District Q&A: Jennifer McClellan, Robert "Family Man" MurrayAnswers to the question on Flock and other automatic license plate readers
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. McClellan calls the technology a useful investigative tool but says systems like Flock should be carefully reviewed with significant public input before implementation and must respect the Fourth Amendment. That is acceptance subject to review and constitutional limits, which fits Mixed or conditional.

Portrait of Jennifer McClellan

Jennifer McClellan

Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Virginia 4th district

Condemned

Statement summary

Jennifer L. McClellan voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. House Roll Call Vote 307: H.Con.Res. 93, Iran War Powers Resolution (agreed to, 220-204)
Why we used this label

A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.

Portrait of Jennifer McClellan

Jennifer McClellan

Role at the time: Member of Congress, in an official statement

Condemned

Statement summary

Rep. Jennifer McClellan said her vote on the Iran War Powers Resolution was intended to end the war and bring service members home.

“I voted yes to end this reckless war, bring our servicemembers home, end this senseless bloodshed, protect our national security interests, defend the Constitution and put a check on this Administration.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)McClellan statement on House passage of the Iran War Powers ResolutionPress release dated June 3, 2026; paragraph beginning "I voted yes to end this reckless war..."
Why we used this label

The case tracks continued U.S. military operations against Iran. The speaker calls for ending the war or removing U.S. forces, which rejects continued operations.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Do they support the war in Iran?

Relationship to this case: Speaker

Where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the Iran war, which Congress has not formally authorized, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements and public remarks.

Iran WarU.S. PoliticsUpdated

Topics in this coverage