Conor Friedersdorf

Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic who covers politics and national affairs. He is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter collecting nonfiction writing.

What we have documented

We have documented 2 statements by Conor Friedersdorf, in 2 cases. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Statements by Conor Friedersdorf

Conor Friedersdorf

Role at the time: Staff writer at The Atlantic, writing an opinion column

Condemned

Statement summary

Friedersdorf criticizes Flock's existing safeguards and urges local bans until stronger protections are in place. He credits its audit tool while calling for regulation to protect privacy.

“I'd argue that he overstates the strength of Flock's safeguards”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Friedersdorf questions Flock safeguards and proposes bans pending stronger protections · The AtlanticOctober 12 column; paragraphs on Audit Assistance and legal safeguards
Why we used this label

He criticizes the adequacy of current safeguards. His conditions for future use do not endorse the existing system.

Conor Friedersdorf

Role at the time: Staff writer at The Atlantic writing an analysis article.

Condemned

Response to this claim

French’s posts demeaned the pictured people because of their race or ethnicity.

“Bo French’s xenophobia should force Republicans to confront the prejudice in their ranks.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Conor Friedersdorf condemns Bo French’s posts about Texas sports fansArticle discussing French’s posts and the criticism they generated.
Why we used this label

Friedersdorf directly condemns the conduct under scrutiny as xenophobic and appearance-based prejudice.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Case

Was Bo French’s UT Austin post racist?

Relationship to this case: Commentator

Bo French used an image of apparent South Asian UT fans to argue that foreigners were displacing Americans. Critics called the posts racist or xenophobic; French and supporters said they raised a legitimate immigration and admissions dispute.

U.S. PoliticsRacismUpdated

Topics in this coverage