Colin Wright

Portrait of Colin Wright
Gage Skidmore / Flickr / Wikimedia CommonsSourceCC BY-SA 2.0Cropped to Colin Wright from the original two-person photograph and converted to PNG with a plain margin.

Colin Wright is an evolutionary biologist, fellow at the Manhattan Institute and founding editor of Reality's Last Stand. He is an academic adviser to the Society for Evidence-based Gender Medicine and writes about science, biological sex and gender identity.

What we have documented

We have documented 3 statements by Colin Wright, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Is HHS standing by its gender-affirmation survey report?

Get an email if HHS changes or defends the report, its authors answer critics, or researchers publish new analysis of its survey measures.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Colin Wright

Portrait of Colin Wright

Colin Wright

Role at the time: Study coauthor, writing jointly with Lee Jussim and Ohad Fedida

Defended or excused

Statement summary

The authors defended their methods while distinguishing reported attitudes from violent acts.

“Our measures assessed endorsed justification for violence, not actually engaging in violence.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)HHS study authors respond to criticismStatement of Limitations; Findings; Justification of Violence
Why we used this label

They defend the report's methods and interpretation while specifying what it did not measure.

Portrait of Colin Wright

Colin Wright

Role at the time: Coauthor of the HHS report and Manhattan Institute fellow, as identified by The Guardian

Mixed or conditional

Response to this claim

HHS reported that, in its analytic sample, stronger agreement with its Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale was associated with higher left-wing-authoritarianism scores and greater stated justification for specified political-violence scenarios.

“We probably could have tightened the language a little bit more.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)‘Nakedly political’: US attempts to link trans support to authoritarianism in new health department reportPublished September 7, 2026; updated September 8, 2026; comments from Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Daniel Aaron, Craig Konnoth and Colin Wright
Why we used this label

The reported statement contains a specific qualification about the language alongside a continued defense of the study’s intended focus. It is therefore classified as mixed or conditional rather than as a withdrawal of the report’s conclusion.

Portrait of Colin Wright

Colin Wright

Role at the time: Evolutionary biologist and Manhattan Institute fellow; report co-author

Defended or excused

Response to this claim

HHS reported that, in its analytic sample, stronger agreement with its Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale was associated with higher left-wing-authoritarianism scores and greater stated justification for specified political-violence scenarios.

“Acceptance gender ideology appears to augment authoritarian attitudes in support for political violence.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Colin Wright announces the HHS report's findings on XPost text
Why we used this label

As a report co-author, Wright publicly advances the report's interpretive framing rather than merely linking to or reporting on it. The report's stated causal limitations remain material context.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage