Sotomayor opposes traffic stops based on mistakes of law

Sonia SotomayorAssociate justice, writing the dissent

Sotomayor argues that the rule further erodes Fourth Amendment protection.

Responding to

An objectively reasonable mistake of substantive law can justify a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.

“Departing from this tradition means further eroding the Fourth Amendment's protection of civil liberties in a context where that protection has already been worn down.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Heien v. North Carolina: majority, concurrence and dissent · Supreme Court of the United States574 U.S. 54, Roberts pages 57-68; Kagan pages 68-71; Sotomayor pages 71-80
AI-assisted collage of separate photographs of John Roberts and Sonia Sotomayor.
Credit: Steve Petteway / Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States. Composite: Dispute Index.

Where this statement fits

Heien: Roberts and Sotomayor split over traffic stops based on mistakes of law

The Supreme Court held in 2014 that an objectively reasonable mistake of law can justify a traffic stop. Chief Justice John Roberts defends that rule. Justice Sonia Sotomayor argues that police should be judged against the law as it actually exists.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Heien v. North Carolina: majority, concurrence and dissent (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United States574 U.S. 54, Roberts pages 57-68; Kagan pages 68-71; Sotomayor pages 71-80

About this source

The full opinions set out the disagreement over whether an objectively reasonable mistake of substantive law can justify a traffic stop.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Sotomayor would measure the officer's understanding of the facts against the actual law.

After the quotation

She warns that allowing reasonable legal mistakes expands stop authority and can delay clarification of the law.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Her criticism targets the rule allowing stops based on legal mistakes, not the majority's account of the facts.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Sonia Sotomayor, Sotomayor opposes traffic stops based on mistakes of lawDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Sotomayor opposes traffic stops based on mistakes of law
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6457-sotomayor-argues-that-the-rule-further-erodes-fourth

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Sotomayor opposes traffic stops based on mistakes of law". First published: 2026-10-22. Last updated: 2026-10-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/6457-sotomayor-argues-that-the-rule-further-erodes-fourth