Roberts writes in Heien that the Fourth Amendment tolerates only objectively reasonable mistakes of fact or law

John G. Roberts Jr.Chief justice, writing the Court's majority opinion

Roberts defends treating objectively reasonable legal mistakes like reasonable factual mistakes.

Responding to

An objectively reasonable mistake of substantive law can justify a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.

“The Fourth Amendment tolerates only reasonable mistakes, and those mistakes—whether of fact or of law—must be objectively reasonable.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Heien v. North Carolina: majority, concurrence and dissent · Supreme Court of the United States574 U.S. 54, Roberts pages 57-68; Kagan pages 68-71; Sotomayor pages 71-80
AI-assisted collage of separate photographs of John Roberts and Sonia Sotomayor.
Credit: Steve Petteway / Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States. Composite: Dispute Index.

Where this statement fits

Heien: Roberts and Sotomayor split over traffic stops based on mistakes of law

The Supreme Court held in 2014 that an objectively reasonable mistake of law can justify a traffic stop. Chief Justice John Roberts defends that rule. Justice Sonia Sotomayor argues that police should be judged against the law as it actually exists.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Heien v. North Carolina: majority, concurrence and dissent (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United States574 U.S. 54, Roberts pages 57-68; Kagan pages 68-71; Sotomayor pages 71-80

About this source

The full opinions set out the disagreement over whether an objectively reasonable mistake of substantive law can justify a traffic stop.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The majority considers whether an officer's mistaken reading of a brake-light statute can support reasonable suspicion.

After the quotation

Roberts limits the rule to objective reasonableness and rejects an advantage from sloppy study of the law.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

He supports allowing the stop on this basis, the conduct and rule at issue.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: John G. Roberts Jr., Roberts writes in Heien that the Fourth Amendment tolerates only objectively reasonable mistakes of fact or lawDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Roberts writes in Heien that the Fourth Amendment tolerates only objectively reasonable mistakes of fact or law
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6453-roberts-defends-treating-objectively-reasonable-legal-mistakes-like

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Roberts writes in Heien that the Fourth Amendment tolerates only objectively reasonable mistakes of fact or law". First published: 2026-10-22. Last updated: 2026-10-23. https://disputeindex.com/events/6453-roberts-defends-treating-objectively-reasonable-legal-mistakes-like