Steve Hilton says the ad was a satirical way to make a point and asks critics for grace

Steve HiltonRepublican candidate for governor of California

In an X video posted on Saturday evening, October 3 (Pacific time), Hilton said the reaction to the first ad had been overwhelmingly positive and that many viewers may also have been offended. He said the campaign was trying to make a point "in a provocative way, in a satirical way" and that no one was trying to offend anyone. He said it grieves him that viewers were upset, and he asked for "grace" as well as understanding.

Responding to

Steve Hilton said the Just Try It ad was an attempt to make a point in a provocative, satirical way, and that no one was ever trying to offend anyone.

“But it's also true that many people, many of you, may have been offended by that ad. Now, of course, that was never anybody's intention. We were trying to make a point in a provocative way, in a satirical way. No one was ever trying to offend anyone. But I know that many of you were offended, and I've had those conversations, and it grieves me to understand how that made you feel. And I really want to say to you very directly that I get it, and I understand it, and it grieves me that you've been upset by this. But I also want to ask you to understand what we are doing, why we're doing it, and to ask for some grace as well as understanding.”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Steve Hilton's X video on the Just Try It campaign and the reaction to it · Steve HiltonVideo, 1:01 to 2:15 (the first ad's reception, offense, and the request for grace)
A red-haired woman appears in Steve Hilton's "Just Try It" campaign advertisement.
Credit: Steve Hilton for Governor

Where this statement fits

Was Steve Hilton's "Just Try It" campaign ad appropriate?

On October 1, 2026, Republican candidate for governor Steve Hilton posted a 53-second ad titled Just Try It, California. Two young women sit in a dimly lit bedroom, one coaxes the other to try something new, and the scene ends with a mail-in ballot marked for Hilton over Democrat Xavier Becerra. Sonja Shaw and Michael Gates, who have campaigned alongside Hilton, and the pastor Jack Hibbs criticized the ad, Democrats including Rep. Robert Garcia denounced it, and Hilton and Spencer Pratt defended it. Hilton said the campaign was trying to make a point in a provocative, satirical way and that it grieves him that some viewers were upset. The dispute is over whether the ad was an appropriate way to campaign.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original post

Steve Hilton's X video on the Just Try It campaign and the reaction to it (opens in a new tab) · Steve HiltonVideo, 1:01 to 2:15 (the first ad's reception, offense, and the request for grace)

About this source

A 4 minute 37 second video posted at 5:01 p.m. Pacific on Saturday, October 3, 2026 (00:01 UTC on October 4), under the text "A word on our new campaign, 'Just Try It!', and the reaction to it:". Hilton speaks to the camera about the campaign, the reaction to the first ad, and the choice between him and Becerra. The quotation is our transcription of the audio.

Before the quotation

Hilton posted the first ad on October 1 and a second on October 2. Sonja Shaw and Michael Gates, who have campaigned alongside him, and the pastor Jack Hibbs had criticized the first ad publicly before he posted this video, which runs about four and a half minutes.

After the quotation

Hilton goes on to say the campaign will do some things voters love and some they may not love, and that the aim is to speak to Democrats and independents as well as Republicans. He then turns to Xavier Becerra and the choice in the election.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether the Just Try It ad was an appropriate way to campaign. Hilton defends the ad as a provocative, satirical way to make a point and says the reaction to it was overwhelmingly positive. He says it grieves him that viewers were upset, but he does not say the ad was wrong, and he says more ads in the series are coming. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because he acknowledges the offense. We used Defended or excused because the regret he expresses is for how viewers felt, not for the ad itself.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jack Hibbs calls the Hilton ad grotesque and insensitive but says he will still vote for Hilton

Jack Hibbs

“Steve Hilton's "Try It" ad? Grotesque. Insensitive. Somebody on his team made an ignorant decision, and I'm furious. But for California's greater good, for your good, I'm still voting for Steve. His policies are statesmanship-like. No one matches him. This election, from the top of the ballot down, needs your vote for TEAM RED because Team Blue has destroyed this with 100% total control of California for over sixteen years now.”
Read statement

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Steve Hilton says the ad was a satirical way to make a point and asks critics for grace
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4892-in-an-x-video-posted-on-saturday-evening

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Steve Hilton says the ad was a satirical way to make a point and asks critics for grace". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4892-in-an-x-video-posted-on-saturday-evening