Newsom endorsed a 480-camera Flock network in Oakland and the East Bay as a tool for criminal investigations.
Gavin NewsomCalifornia governor
Newsom endorsed a 480-camera Flock network in Oakland and the East Bay as a tool for criminal investigations.
“we're equipping law enforcement with the tools they need to effectively combat criminal activity and hold perpetrators accountable”
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Newsom announced a California Highway Patrol contract for fixed and highway cameras.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Newsom announced a California Highway Patrol contract for fixed and highway cameras.
After the quotation
The announcement described 28-day retention and access limited to California law enforcement. Newsom supported the deployment under those existing rules.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to the continued existence of networked ALPR surveillance, Newsom expressly supports the deployment for law enforcement.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
More from this case
Read the full caseFatehi calls for national regulation and rejects an interim ban
“we need sensible regulation, we need national sensible regulation, but not regulation that either regulates the system out of existence or that requires a ban in the meantime.”Read statement
Jordan calls for unplugging cameras until they can be deployed securely
“And to me, just from the stuff that I’ve, I’ve shown on my channel, this is a solid risk-based argument in itself to unplug the cameras until we could figure out how to deploy them securely.”Read statement
Gluba says Flock and other license plate cameras violate the Fourth Amendment and should be removed
“They are a complete violation of community privacy and safety, they are in direct violation of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and should by law be removed immediately. They have been abused throughout the country by various LEOs and citizens alike as they have little to no security in their software. Every other day we see a new article about someone using a LPR camera system to spy on and track an ex girlfriend or boyfriend, or we see that someone has again used them to track children. They must be removed!”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Newsom endorsed a 480-camera Flock network in Oakland and the East Bay as a tool for criminal investigations.
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3529-newsom-endorsed-a-480-camera-flock-network-in
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Newsom endorsed a 480-camera Flock network in Oakland and the East Bay as a tool for criminal investigations.". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3529-newsom-endorsed-a-480-camera-flock-network-in