Ramin Fatehi

Ramin Fatehi is the commonwealth's attorney for Norfolk, Virginia. He previously worked as a public defender and federal prosecutor. He took office in 2022. He earned a bachelor's degree in history at Yale University and a law degree at Columbia University, then clerked for Virginia Supreme Court Justice Elizabeth B. Lacy. His earlier legal work included positions in Richmond, Chesapeake and Charlottesville. Before his election, he supervised Norfolk prosecutors handling drug offenses, impaired driving and fatal vehicle crashes.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Ramin Fatehi on 2026 Midterm Elections, Law Enforcement, and License-Plate Surveillance, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Ramin Fatehi

Ramin Fatehi

Role at the time: Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney, debating on Open to Debate

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Fatehi calls for sensible national regulation while rejecting rules that would eliminate the system or require an interim ban.

“we need sensible regulation, we need national sensible regulation, but not regulation that either regulates the system out of existence or that requires a ban in the meantime.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Transcript: Should Cities Pull the Plug on Flock Cameras?Benn Jordan at 03:06; Ramin Fatehi at 35:12
Why we used this label

The matter under scrutiny is use of Flock's camera network. Fatehi defends continued use with regulation and explicitly rejects an interim ban.

Ramin Fatehi

Role at the time: Norfolk commonwealth's attorney

Defended or excused

Statement summary

Fatehi defended license-plate readers as evidence that can help solve crimes while reducing some police-citizen encounters.

“It promotes public safety and civil rights”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Virginia officials want a Flock camera pause; Spanberger disagreesGovernor Spanberger's remarks on an outright ban
Why we used this label

He argues the systems have a legitimate investigative and civil-rights benefit.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.