Jordan calls for unplugging cameras until they can be deployed securely
Benn JordanMusician and independent security researcher, debating on Open to Debate
Jordan argues that the security risks he has investigated justify stopping current camera use until the systems can be deployed securely.
“And to me, just from the stuff that I’ve, I’ve shown on my channel, this is a solid risk-based argument in itself to unplug the cameras until we could figure out how to deploy them securely.”
Interview
Interview
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Interview
About this source
Open to Debate publishes the full discussion moderated by John Donvan. Timestamps refer to its transcript.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Interview
About this source
The publisher's original video presents Jordan's argument for unplugging cameras and Fatehi's argument for continued use with regulation.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Jordan describes his investigations into camera security and access to law enforcement accounts.
After the quotation
His proposal calls for unplugging the cameras until secure deployment is possible.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Jordan supports unplugging the cameras for now and conditions future deployment on being able to deploy them securely.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseFatehi calls for national regulation and rejects an interim ban
“we need sensible regulation, we need national sensible regulation, but not regulation that either regulates the system out of existence or that requires a ban in the meantime.”Read statement
Gluba says Flock and other license plate cameras violate the Fourth Amendment and should be removed
“They are a complete violation of community privacy and safety, they are in direct violation of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and should by law be removed immediately. They have been abused throughout the country by various LEOs and citizens alike as they have little to no security in their software. Every other day we see a new article about someone using a LPR camera system to spy on and track an ex girlfriend or boyfriend, or we see that someone has again used them to track children. They must be removed!”Read statement
Ellis would prohibit Flock-style cameras in Maryland and bar public agencies from contracting for them
“I oppose the the use of flock style cameras and would prohibit their use in Maryland. I would also prohibit any state or public agency from contracting with these surveilance tools.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Jordan calls for unplugging cameras until they can be deployed securely
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6729-jordan-argues-that-the-security-risks-he-has
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Jordan calls for unplugging cameras until they can be deployed securely". First published: 2026-10-25. Last updated: 2026-10-25. https://disputeindex.com/events/6729-jordan-argues-that-the-security-risks-he-has