Gluba says Flock and other license plate cameras violate the Fourth Amendment and should be removed
Nicholas GlubaLibertarian Party of Iowa candidate for governor, in an emailed statement
In an emailed statement, Gluba said Flock, Axon and other license plate reader cameras violate community privacy and the Fourth Amendment and should be removed by law immediately. The statement says police and private citizens have abused the systems and cites reports of people using them to track former partners and children.
“They are a complete violation of community privacy and safety, they are in direct violation of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and should by law be removed immediately. They have been abused throughout the country by various LEOs and citizens alike as they have little to no security in their software. Every other day we see a new article about someone using a LPR camera system to spy on and track an ex girlfriend or boyfriend, or we see that someone has again used them to track children. They must be removed!”
Emailed statement
Read the full email
The public comment and stance for Nicholas Gluba on FLOCK cameras, or AXON, any of the LPRs is, "They are a complete violation of community privacy and safety, they are in direct violation of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and should by law be removed immediately. They have been abused throughout the country by various LEOs and citizens alike as they have little to no security in their software. Every other day we see a new article about someone using a LPR camera system to spy on and track an ex girlfriend or boyfriend, or we see that someone has again used them to track children. They must be removed!"
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Emailed statement
Emailed statement from Nicholas Gluba to Dispute Index on Flock license-plate cameras
The public comment and stance for Nicholas Gluba on FLOCK cameras, or AXON, any of the LPRs is, "They are a complete violation of community privacy and safety, they are in direct violation of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and should by law be removed immediately. They have been abused throughout the country by various LEOs and citizens alike as they have little to no security in their software. Every other day we see a new article about someone using a LPR camera system to spy on and track an ex girlfriend or boyfriend, or we see that someone has again used them to track children. They must be removed!"
About this source
Nicholas Gluba sent this statement in reply to a Dispute Index request for comment, from an address on lpia.org, the Libertarian Party of Iowa's domain. The Gluba for Iowa campaign's Facebook page lists the same address for contact. The link is to the Gluba for Iowa campaign website.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Dispute Index asked the Gluba campaign whether Gluba supports, opposes or wants changes to Flock-style license plate camera networks in Iowa. The reply came by email on October 18, 2026.
After the quotation
The reply was signed Nicholas Gluba and sent from an address on the Libertarian Party of Iowa's domain.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to whether networked license-plate surveillance should exist, Gluba calls license plate cameras a violation of community privacy and the Fourth Amendment and says they should be removed by law immediately, so we labeled it Condemned. On the remedy ladder this is Ban or remove, the strongest step the statement names.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
More from this case
Read the full caseEllis would prohibit Flock-style cameras in Maryland and bar public agencies from contracting for them
“I oppose the the use of flock style cameras and would prohibit their use in Maryland. I would also prohibit any state or public agency from contracting with these surveilance tools.”Read statement
Brandenburg opposes Flock-style camera networks in Michigan
“I, Donna Brandenburg, oppose Flock and all 3rd party - Flock-style license plate camera networks in Michigan. Tracking the movements of law-abiding citizens without a warrant is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article 1, Section 11 of the Michigan Constitution, which expressly protects 'electronic data and electronic communications.' As governor, I would end state participation in these surveillance networks, require a warrant based on probable cause before any data is collected or accessed, and order existing data on innocent drivers destroyed.”Read statement
Block says Flock cameras should be regulated heavily, as other states have done
“We should regulate them pretty heavily, and other states have”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Gluba says Flock and other license plate cameras violate the Fourth Amendment and should be removed
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6017-in-an-emailed-statement-gluba-said-flock-axon
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Gluba says Flock and other license plate cameras violate the Fourth Amendment and should be removed". First published: 2026-10-18. Last updated: 2026-10-18. https://disputeindex.com/events/6017-in-an-emailed-statement-gluba-said-flock-axon