Quad9 plans France withdrawal over beIN site-blocking orders

Quad9 plans to leave France on November 24 after a court imposes a daily penalty for failing to implement sports-stream blocking. beIN seeks enforcement; Quad9 challenges the orders' technical feasibility and effect on users.

Rows of equipment racks and cables in a data center.
Data-center equipment racks photographed in November 2015. File photo; not a Quad9 facility.

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Quad9beIN Sports France

Overview

The October 21 judgment (opens in a new tab) enforces an earlier May 13 blocking order concerning unauthorized WTA streams. The court finds that Quad9 has not shown a technical impossibility and has taken no blocking measures. It imposes a penalty of 1,000 euros per day through the end of the ordered measures on November 14.

Quad9's October 22 announcement (opens in a new tab) argues that reliable territorial blocking is impractical and global blocking would extend French restrictions to other users. It plans to stop serving France on November 24 and cites other pending litigation.

EFF supports the withdrawal (opens in a new tab), arguing that infrastructure-level blocking threatens access and privacy. The announced departure date follows the expiry of this particular order; the dispute also concerns wider litigation risk and principle. The judgment records Quad9's appeal of the May 13 order and says that appeal does not suspend enforcement.

Timeline

2 timeline entries on this page. Dates: October 21, 2026 to October 22, 2026

  1. October 2026

    1. Paris court imposes a daily compliance penalty

      Source release

      The judgment imposes a 1,000-euro daily penalty to enforce the earlier blocking order, through the end of its measures.

      [01]beIN Sports France v. Quad9: penalty judgment

      The judgment recounts the parties' submissions and imposes a daily penalty to enforce an earlier blocking order.

      beIN Sports France v. Quad9: penalty judgmentParis Judicial Court, RG 26/11882; paragraphs 5, 8-18 and 21; disposition
    2. Quad9 announces withdrawal planned for November 24

      Source release

      Quad9 says it will stop serving French users on November 24.

      [02]Quad9 announces planned withdrawal from France

      Quad9 opposes court-ordered DNS blocking and announces withdrawal on November 24, 2026.

      Quad9 announces planned withdrawal from FranceSummary and What we are doing on November 24

Response record

Responses

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

2 matching responses. Newest first.

  1. Quad9Quad9, official withdrawal announcementDirectly involved

    Before this statement

    Quad9 says French courts handed down an unfavorable ruling against it the day before, and that it cannot comply with the ruling over the long term while remaining faithful to its mission. It says recursive DNS resolution is a neutral and passive service.

    "We categorically refuse to alter or lie to you about the DNS responses you receive in a way that opposes your expectations."
    Condemned

    Case context: Quad9 plans France withdrawal over beIN site-blocking orders

    Full statement and sources

    Quad9 says it refuses to alter the DNS responses users receive, calls recursive DNS resolution a neutral and passive service, and says compliance with the ruling is technically unfeasible.

    After the statement

    Quad9 says the ruling forces an untenable position on it, that compliance is technically unfeasible and contradicts its mandate to serve the public, and that it will withdraw its services from France on November 24.

    Quad9 announces planned withdrawal from FranceSummary and What we are doing on November 24

    Why this label?

    The case's reference point is the French court orders requiring Quad9 to block sports-streaming domains through its DNS resolver. Quad9 refuses to alter DNS responses as the orders require and calls compliance technically unfeasible, which rejects the orders.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. beIN Sports FrancebeIN Sports France, through its legal submissions recounted in paragraph 5 of the judgmentDirectly involved

    Before this statement

    A May 13 judgment of the Paris court ordered Quad9 to put blocking measures in place. beIN brought the case to the court's September 23 hearing to obtain enforcement of that judgment through provisional penalties until the end of the 2026 WTA season.

    "Action: Asked for a penalty of 10,000 euros per day per domain or subdomain remaining accessible through Quad9, to enforce the May 13 blocking order."
    Defended or excused

    Case context: Quad9 plans France withdrawal over beIN site-blocking orders

    Full statement and sources

    In its September 22 submissions, beIN asks the court to attach a penalty of 10,000 euros per day, per domain still reachable through Quad9, to the May 13 blocking order.

    After the statement

    beIN also asks the court to order Quad9 to pay 5,000 euros in costs. In its September 28 submissions, Quad9 asks the court to reject all of beIN's requests.

    beIN Sports France v. Quad9: penalty judgmentParis Judicial Court, RG 26/11882; paragraphs 5, 8-18 and 21; disposition

    Why this label?

    The case's reference point is the French court orders requiring Quad9 to block sports-streaming domains. beIN, which obtained the May 13 blocking order, asks the court to enforce it against Quad9 with daily penalties, so it supports the orders under scrutiny.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

Sources

(3)

Original text

beIN Sports France v. Quad9: penalty judgment

beIN Sports France v. Quad9: penalty judgment (opens in a new tab)Paris Judicial Court, RG 26/11882; paragraphs 5, 8-18 and 21; disposition
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paris Judicial Court, RG 26/11882; paragraphs 5, 8-18 and 21; disposition

About this source

The judgment recounts the parties' submissions and imposes a daily penalty to enforce an earlier blocking order.

Author
Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Analysis

EFF supports Quad9's withdrawal over site-blocking orders

EFF supports Quad9's withdrawal over site-blocking orders (opens in a new tab)Opening paragraph; criticism of infrastructure providers policing copyright
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraph; criticism of infrastructure providers policing copyright

About this source

EFF argues that withdrawal protects users' rights and criticizes requiring infrastructure providers to police copyright.

Author
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Quad9 announces planned withdrawal from France

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Summary and What we are doing on November 24

About this source

Quad9 opposes court-ordered DNS blocking and announces withdrawal on November 24, 2026.

Author
Quad9
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

5 updates added in the last 14 days.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.

Share or embed this case

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the case page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Quad9 plans France withdrawal over beIN site-blocking orders
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/cases/quad9-france-bein-dns-blocking-withdrawal

The Dispute Index. "Quad9 plans France withdrawal over beIN site-blocking orders". First published: 2026-10-28. Last updated: 2026-10-28. https://disputeindex.com/cases/quad9-france-bein-dns-blocking-withdrawal