Lina Khan defends the FTC's noncompete ban; Andrew Ferguson challenges its authority

Khan defended the FTC's nationwide noncompete rule as a protection for workers and competition. Ferguson challenged its legal authority. The rule was blocked and is not enforceable; their disagreement concerns the scope of FTC power.

The Federal Trade Commission headquarters building in Washington, D.C.
Federal Trade Commission headquarters in Washington, D.C., photographed on April 4, 2014.

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Federal Trade CommissionLina KhanAndrew N. Ferguson

Overview

The rule sought to prohibit new worker noncompetes and most existing ones, with exceptions. Khan and fellow commissioners defended statutory authority in a December 31, 2024 response to the dissent. Ferguson's June 28 dissent separates policy wisdom from legal authority. The FTC's current notice says a district court stopped enforcement on August 20, 2024. On September 5, 2025, the commission announced steps to dismiss its appeals and accept vacatur. This is a historical rulemaking dispute, not an announcement that a national ban currently protects every worker.

People in this case

Timeline

3 timeline entries on this page. Dates: April 23, 2024 to September 5, 2025

  1. April 2024

    1. FTC adopts noncompete rule

      The commission adopts a nationwide rule restricting worker noncompetes.

      [01]Federal Trade Commission

      The adoption announcement includes Khan's policy argument. A notice now states that the rule is not in effect or enforceable.

      FTC announces national noncompete rule · Federal Trade CommissionLina Khan statement; current status notice
  2. August 2024

    1. Court blocks rule enforcement

      The FTC's status notice records the district court order stopping enforcement.

      [01]Federal Trade Commission

      The adoption announcement includes Khan's policy argument. A notice now states that the rule is not in effect or enforceable.

      FTC announces national noncompete rule · Federal Trade CommissionLina Khan statement; current status notice
  3. September 2025

    1. FTC moves to dismiss appeals

      The commission votes 3-1 to dismiss its appeals and accept vacatur of the rule.

      [02]Federal Trade Commission

      The FTC announces steps to dismiss its appeals and accept the rule's vacatur.

      FTC takes steps to dismiss noncompete appeals · Federal Trade CommissionOpening paragraphs and 3-1 commission vote

Claims

Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.

What's disputed

Response record

Responses

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

2 matching responses. Newest first.

  1. Lina KhanFTC chair at the time, in a statement joined by Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro BedoyaDirectly involved

    Before this statement

    Khan answers Commissioners Ferguson and Holyoak in a statement dated December 31, after the court had blocked enforcement.

    "The Commission has the authority to promulgate this rule, based on the plain text of the FTC Act, case law, and statutory history."
    Defended or excused

    Case context: Lina Khan defends the FTC's noncompete ban; Andrew Ferguson challenges its authority

    Full statement and sources

    Khan argues that the FTC Act authorizes the noncompete rule.

    After the statement

    She cites Section 6(g) and the National Petroleum Refiners decision.

    Khan and colleagues answer noncompete dissent · Federal Trade CommissionSection a, printed pages 1-6

    Why this label?

    The reference point is the FTC's nationwide rule. Khan expressly defends its legal authority.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. Andrew N. FergusonFTC commissioner at the time, joined by Melissa HolyoakDirectly involved

    Before this statement

    Ferguson describes the rule as the most extraordinary assertion of authority in the FTC's history.

    "Whatever the Final Rule’s wisdom as a matter of public policy, it is unlawful. Congress has not authorized us to issue it. The Constitution forbids it. And it violates the basic requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act."
    Condemned

    Case context: Lina Khan defends the FTC's noncompete ban; Andrew Ferguson challenges its authority

    Full statement and sources

    Ferguson argues that the rule exceeds the FTC's lawful authority regardless of policy wisdom.

    After the statement

    He dissents on statutory, constitutional and administrative-law grounds.

    Ferguson and Holyoak dissent from noncompete rule · Federal Trade CommissionPage 1 and authority analysis

    Why this label?

    The reference point is the FTC's nationwide rule. Ferguson expressly rejects its lawfulness, without necessarily defending every noncompete agreement.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

Sources

(4)

Official statement

FTC announces national noncompete rule

FTC announces national noncompete rule (opens in a new tab) · Federal Trade CommissionLina Khan statement; current status notice
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Lina Khan statement; current status notice

About this source

The adoption announcement includes Khan's policy argument. A notice now states that the rule is not in effect or enforceable.

Author
Federal Trade Commission
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Khan and colleagues answer noncompete dissent

Khan and colleagues answer noncompete dissent (opens in a new tab) · Federal Trade CommissionSection a, printed pages 1-6
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Section a, printed pages 1-6

About this source

Khan, joined by Slaughter and Bedoya, argues that the FTC Act, precedent and statutory history authorize the rule.

Author
Lina Khan
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

FTC takes steps to dismiss noncompete appeals

FTC takes steps to dismiss noncompete appeals (opens in a new tab) · Federal Trade CommissionOpening paragraphs and 3-1 commission vote
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs and 3-1 commission vote

About this source

The FTC announces steps to dismiss its appeals and accept the rule's vacatur.

Author
Federal Trade Commission
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Ferguson and Holyoak dissent from noncompete rule

Ferguson and Holyoak dissent from noncompete rule (opens in a new tab) · Federal Trade CommissionPage 1 and authority analysis
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Page 1 and authority analysis

About this source

Ferguson argues the rule is unlawful regardless of its policy merits. Melissa Holyoak joins the dissent.

Author
Andrew N. Ferguson
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

6 updates added in the last 14 days.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.

Share or embed this case

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the case page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Lina Khan defends the FTC's noncompete ban; Andrew Ferguson challenges its authority
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/cases/ftc-noncompete-ban-khan-ferguson-rulemaking-authority

The Dispute Index. "Lina Khan defends the FTC's noncompete ban; Andrew Ferguson challenges its authority". First published: 2026-10-16. Last updated: 2026-10-16. https://disputeindex.com/cases/ftc-noncompete-ban-khan-ferguson-rulemaking-authority