Ferguson rejects FTC authority for the nationwide noncompete rule

Andrew N. FergusonFTC commissioner at the time, joined by Melissa Holyoak

Ferguson argues that the rule exceeds the FTC's lawful authority regardless of policy wisdom.

“Whatever the Final Rule’s wisdom as a matter of public policy, it is unlawful. Congress has not authorized us to issue it. The Constitution forbids it. And it violates the basic requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Ferguson and Holyoak dissent from noncompete rule · Federal Trade CommissionPage 1 and authority analysis
The Federal Trade Commission headquarters building in Washington, D.C.
Credit: Gunnar Klack / CC BY-SA 4.0

Where this statement fits

Lina Khan defends the FTC's noncompete ban; Andrew Ferguson challenges its authority

The FTC adopted a nationwide noncompete rule in April 2024. Lina Khan defended its benefits and the agency's legal authority. Andrew N. Ferguson argued that Congress had not authorized the rule, regardless of its policy merits. A court blocked enforcement, and the FTC later took steps to dismiss its appeals. The rule is not in effect or enforceable.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Ferguson and Holyoak dissent from noncompete rule (opens in a new tab) · Federal Trade CommissionPage 1 and authority analysis

About this source

Ferguson argues the rule is unlawful regardless of its policy merits. Melissa Holyoak joins the dissent.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Ferguson describes the rule as the most extraordinary assertion of authority in the FTC's history.

After the quotation

He dissents on statutory, constitutional and administrative-law grounds.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is the FTC's nationwide rule. Ferguson expressly rejects its lawfulness, without necessarily defending every noncompete agreement.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Andrew N. Ferguson, Ferguson rejects FTC authority for the nationwide noncompete ruleDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Ferguson rejects FTC authority for the nationwide noncompete rule
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5782-ferguson-argues-that-the-rule-exceeds-the-ftc

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Ferguson rejects FTC authority for the nationwide noncompete rule". First published: 2026-10-16. Last updated: 2026-10-16. https://disputeindex.com/events/5782-ferguson-argues-that-the-rule-exceeds-the-ftc