Andrew Ferguson renews his objection to the nationwide noncompete rule

Andrew N. FergusonFTC chairman, speaking in his own capacity at an FTC workshop

Andrew Ferguson said his objection concerned the FTC's asserted power to impose the ban, while favoring enforcement against anticompetitive noncompete agreements.

“I therefore objected to the Biden Administration’s assertion of extraordinary power rather than its assertion about the beneficial effects of the proposed rule.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Andrew Ferguson remarks at the FTC noncompete workshop · Federal Trade CommissionPrepared remarks, pages 1-2 and conclusion on page 11
The Federal Trade Commission headquarters building in Washington, D.C.
Credit: Gunnar Klack / CC BY-SA 4.0

Where this statement fits

Lina Khan defends the FTC's noncompete ban; Andrew Ferguson challenges its authority

The FTC adopted a nationwide noncompete rule in April 2024. Lina Khan defended its benefits and the agency's legal authority. Andrew N. Ferguson argued that Congress had not authorized the rule, regardless of its policy merits. A court blocked enforcement, and the FTC later took steps to dismiss its appeals. The rule is not in effect or enforceable.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Andrew Ferguson remarks at the FTC noncompete workshop (opens in a new tab) · Federal Trade CommissionPrepared remarks, pages 1-2 and conclusion on page 11

About this source

Ferguson explains his objection to the nationwide rule and his preference for enforcement against specific anticompetitive agreements. The remarks identify the views as his own.

Before the quotation

In prepared remarks for a noncompete workshop, Ferguson said he accepted that such agreements can have anticompetitive effects.

After the quotation

He proposed focusing enforcement on agreements that lack a procompetitive purpose or are not narrowly tailored to one.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the nationwide FTC rule, Ferguson rejects the asserted regulatory power. He separately favors enforcement against specific unlawful agreements.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Federal Trade Commission

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Andrew N. Ferguson, Andrew Ferguson renews his objection to the nationwide noncompete ruleDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Andrew Ferguson renews his objection to the nationwide noncompete rule
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5837-andrew-ferguson-said-his-objection-concerned-the-ftc

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Andrew Ferguson renews his objection to the nationwide noncompete rule". First published: 2026-10-16. Last updated: 2026-10-16. https://disputeindex.com/events/5837-andrew-ferguson-said-his-objection-concerned-the-ftc