All topics

Political Violence

Public disputes concerning politically motivated violence, threats, attacks, and claims about the causes or consequences of such violence.

Related cases

Case

Mosab Hassan Yousef’s call for Muslims to leave the United States at the Jewish American Summit

At the August 30, 2026 Jewish American Summit in Los Angeles, Mosab Hassan Yousef said he did not want Muslims in America, used profanity to tell Muslims to leave the United States, and told them to return to and reform the countries they came from. Audience members applauded. Critics characterized the remarks and the response as anti-Muslim bigotry; the dispute also concerns responsibility among the event's organizers, sponsors, speakers, and public commentators.

Case

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Hasan Piker affirmed a hypothetical preference for Hamas over Israel through lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau disputed the moral comparison, while the ADL cited it as whitewashing terrorism. Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes and denied endorsing its domestic policies, while maintaining that Israeli occupation was the overriding concern.

Case

U.S. termination of the Hashemi–Tahmasebi family’s residency status and ICE detention

On April 11, 2026, the U.S. State Department said it had terminated the lawful permanent resident status of Seyed Eissa Hashemi, Maryam Tahmasebi, and their son, and that ICE had them in custody pending removal. Officials cited family ties and foreign-policy or national-security grounds; the family, its lawyers, and other commentators have disputed the action as family-based punishment. This case records those competing positions without deciding the legal validity of the action or the family’s current status.

More cases

Statements

Nick Fuentes

Role at the time: Host, America First

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"He does justify violence against Jews, and that’s unacceptable. He’s a real anti-Semite."
Why we used this label

The wording is an explicit condemnation, but Fuentes also said he had not heard the exact statement; that limits its evidentiary weight.

America First Ep. 1739 — Nick Fuentes discusses Hasan Piker (opens in a new tab)Transcript anchor #text-8833; player timestamp requires verification

David Frum

Role at the time: Staff writer at The Atlantic and host of The David Frum Show

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"Good start. But then ... So that's not so good."
Why we used this label

His response combines explicit credit for the opening condemnation with a negative assessment of what followed.

Dana Nessel

Role at the time: Michigan attorney general

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"making excuses for an attempted mass killing of children"
Why we used this label

This is direct Democratic criticism grounded in the impact of the framing on the targeted community.

Tim Pool

Role at the time: Host, Timcast IRL

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"I actually agree with the surface level sentiment. People like Hasan and his followers … were not expressing what I just expressed."
Why we used this label

He accepts the surface-level proposition while rejecting Piker’s framing or implied meaning, producing a conditional rather than binary stance.

Owen Jones

Role at the time: Journalist and commentator

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording assigned American Jews responsibility for antisemitic violence directed at them.

"The argument here is that this is victim blaming—which is total nonsense."
Why we used this label

The quoted sentence directly contests the victim-blaming characterization.

Hasan Piker smeared by a panicked political establishment (opens in a new tab)Section discussing the victim-blaming interpretation

Ben Shapiro

Role at the time: Host, The Ben Shapiro Show; columnist

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording functioned as an implied threat against American Jews.

"He also spent the weekend suggesting that Jews who support Israel are fair game."
Why we used this label

Describing people as “fair game” treats the wording as threatening or permissive toward harm.

Cory Booker

Role at the time: United States senator from New Jersey

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"Hasan Piker's dangerous and hateful language targeting Jewish Americans has no place in our civic discourse."
Why we used this label

Booker explicitly characterizes Piker's language as dangerous and hateful.

Elissa Slotkin

Role at the time: United States senator from Michigan

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"This shouldn't be hard: no community should face the threat of violence for their political views."
Why we used this label

Slotkin rejects the attribution of responsibility to people targeted for political views.

Cenk Uygur

Role at the time: Co-host, The Young Turks

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"he was saying, let’s protect Jewish Americans"
Why we used this label

He directly supplies a protective rather than threatening interpretation of the remarks.

Kyle Kulinski

Role at the time: Host, The Kyle Kulinski Show

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"What part of that was anti-Semitic? What part of that was a call for violence?"
Why we used this label

The rhetorical questions directly reject the critical characterization without necessarily endorsing every word Piker used.

Ana Kasparian

Role at the time: Co-host, The Young Turks

Defended or excused

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"the least controversial thing Hasan Piker has ever said"
Why we used this label

She affirmatively rejects the controversy’s premise and treats Piker’s underlying warning as reasonable.

Andrew Kolvet

Role at the time: Host, The Charlie Kirk Show

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s passage was antisemitic.

"this guy openly salivates when it comes to political violence. And here he is attacking another Jewish Democrat."
Why we used this label

The statement is a direct moral condemnation that frames the passage as hostile and violence-adjacent.

Brad Sherman

Role at the time: U.S. representative

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"Hasan Piker is trying to encourage and justify violence against American Jews."
Why we used this label

The statement directly attributes encouragement and justification of violence to Piker.

Hillary Scholten

Role at the time: U.S. representative for Michigan's Third Congressional District, issuing an official statement

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"It's dangerous for everyone. […] It has no place in Michigan, and no place in our country."
Why we used this label

The official release explicitly rejects the specific remarks, characterizes them as dangerous and calls for public condemnation.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate and former Wayne County health director

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"Antisemitism is a scourge, and we need to address it in all its forms."
Why we used this label

El-Sayed condemns antisemitism and rejects rhetoric that endangers the Jewish community.

Jeremy Moss

Role at the time: Michigan state senator

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"We will not be lectured by a California podcaster about what Oakland County, Michigan's Jewish community should and shouldn't believe."
Why we used this label

Moss rejects Piker's framing and describes it as blaming Jewish people for antisemitic harm.

Hakeem Jeffries

Role at the time: House Democratic leader and U.S. representative

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording assigned American Jews responsibility for antisemitic violence directed at them.

"The malicious claim that American Jews are inviting violence against themselves is dangerous and antisemitic."
Why we used this label

The statement explicitly labels the disputed claim dangerous and antisemitic.

Raheleh Amiri

Role at the time: Iranian-born activist quoted in reporting

Defended or excused

Responding to

U.S. termination of the Hashemi–Tahmasebi family’s residency status and ICE detention

"I, and many young Iranians who were shot, tortured, harassed, and killed by the government of the Islamic Republic, also wanted one thing and one thing only: an ordinary life for ourselves in our own country, Iran."
Why we used this label

Her reported remarks advocate completion of removal, though the source does not show her independently endorsing detention conditions or duration.

Scott Jennings

Role at the time: Republican political strategist and CNN political commentator

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"That's how you would justify any and all political violence. That is a dangerous mindset."
Why we used this label

The statement directly rejects the explanation-versus-justification distinction at the center of the dispute.

Noah Rothman

Role at the time: Senior writer at National Review

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"He agonized over whether to condemn an Islamist attack on a Michigan synagogue in which Jewish children were targets."
Why we used this label

The authored article treats El-Sayed's contextualization as a failure to distinguish terrorism from Israeli military action.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate nominee in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

The Temple Israel attack should be understood in part through the cycle of violence created by the regional war and the Israeli airstrike that killed members of the assailant's family.

"We should stop hurting people."
Why we used this label

The response maintained his causal framing after the primary rather than retracting it.

Hasan Piker

Role at the time: Political commentator; CNN interview guest

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

The comparison does not endorse all Hamas actions or its domestic policies.

"It's not an endorsement of their domestic policies."
Why we used this label

Disputes the implications of the comparison without withdrawing it.

CNN — Piker addresses his Hamas comparison in August 2 interview (opens in a new tab)Exchange beginning with O’Sullivan asking why Piker expresses support for Hamas; through Piker's domestic-policy answer.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Providing causal context for the attack did not justify it; the attack remained wrong, antisemitic, and unjustifiable.

"It's unserious when you want to decontextualize violence, and then say you want to stand against violence."
Why we used this label

He directly challenged critics' interpretation and maintained the explanation-versus-excuse distinction.

Josh Gottheimer

Role at the time: U.S. Representative; co-introducer of the resolution

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

"We cannot be selective in calling out antisemitism."
Why we used this label

An official statement condemning Piker's rhetoric in a resolution that includes the comparison. The classification is not a claim that Gottheimer's quoted words addressed only this statement.

Gottheimer and Lawler introduce resolution condemning Piker’s rhetoric (opens in a new tab) - Josh GottheimerGottheimer statement; release linking the introduced resolution. The resolution cites Piker's Hamas-over-Israel comparison among other statements.
Older statements

People with useful coverage

Noah Rothman

Senior writer at National Review and political commentator.

1 case and 1 statement

Josh Gottheimer

United States representative for New Jersey's 5th congressional district.

1 case and 1 statement

Van Jones

Van Jones is an author, commentator, producer and social entrepreneur. His projects include the nonprofit Dream Machine and the production company Magic Labs Media. His writing addresses politics, criminal justice, artificial intelligence and cooperation across political and social divides.

1 case and 1 statement

Jon Favreau

Former White House speechwriter, political commentator, and co-host of Pod Save America.

1 case and 1 statement

Rabbi Jen Lader

Jen Lader is a rabbi associated with Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, Michigan.

1 case and 1 statement

Tim Scott

Tim Scott is a United States senator from South Carolina.

1 case and 1 statement

Mike Rogers

Former FBI special agent and former U.S. representative for Michigan's 8th congressional district.

1 case and 1 statement

Tim Miller

Tim Miller is a political podcaster associated with The Bulwark Podcast.

1 case and 1 statement

Noah Arbit

Noah Arbit is a Michigan state representative and Jewish community advocate.

1 case and 1 statement