All topics

Political Violence

Public disputes concerning politically motivated violence, threats, attacks, and claims about the causes or consequences of such violence.

Related cases

Case

Mosab Hassan Yousef’s call for Muslims to leave the United States at the Jewish American Summit

At the August 30, 2026 Jewish American Summit in Los Angeles, Mosab Hassan Yousef said he did not want Muslims in America, used profanity to tell Muslims to leave the United States, and told them to return to and reform the countries they came from. Audience members applauded. Critics characterized the remarks and the response as anti-Muslim bigotry; the dispute also concerns responsibility among the event's organizers, sponsors, speakers, and public commentators.

Case

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

Hasan Piker affirmed a hypothetical preference for Hamas over Israel through lesser-evil reasoning. Jon Favreau disputed the moral comparison, while the ADL cited it as whitewashing terrorism. Piker later acknowledged Hamas war crimes and denied endorsing its domestic policies, while maintaining that Israeli occupation was the overriding concern.

Case

U.S. termination of the Hashemi–Tahmasebi family’s residency status and ICE detention

On April 11, 2026, the U.S. State Department said it had terminated the lawful permanent resident status of Seyed Eissa Hashemi, Maryam Tahmasebi, and their son, and that ICE had them in custody pending removal. Officials cited family ties and foreign-policy or national-security grounds; the family, its lawyers, and other commentators have disputed the action as family-based punishment. This case records those competing positions without deciding the legal validity of the action or the family’s current status.

More cases

Statements

Christine Hong

Role at the time: UC Santa Cruz professor and UC Ethnic Studies Council member, quoted email

Condemned

Responding to

Mosab Hassan Yousef’s call for Muslims to leave the United States at the Jewish American Summit

"his strategic silence, which amounts to sanctioning violence"
Why we used this label

The email directly criticizes Sures; the allegation remains attributed to Hong rather than adopted as a finding.

Yair Lapid

Role at the time: Israeli opposition politician and former prime minister

Condemned

Responding to

Was Netanyahu warned by the UAE about a major Hamas operation before October 7?

"Three weeks before the massacre, I warned the Prime Minister at a press conference that this was what was going to happen."
Why we used this label

He directly blamed Netanyahu for failing to act on multiple warnings and tied that failure to the attack’s occurrence.

Max Blumenthal

Role at the time: Journalist and editor, The Grayzone

Condemned

Responding to

Yousef's remarks and the audience applause constituted anti-Muslim hate and warranted an apology and repudiation from the summit and its sponsors.

"The Israeli Shin Bet tortured Mosab to the point that he now sounds like Hitler and looks like Herzl."
Why we used this label

Despite its own provocative wording, the comparison unmistakably condemns Yousef's rhetoric.

Andrew Kolvet

Role at the time: Turning Point USA spokesperson and political media host

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"Michigan CANNOT afford to elect a guy like Sayed."
Why we used this label

The authored post expressly endorsed criticism centered on El-Sayed's Temple Israel response and urged electoral rejection.

Rabbi Asher Lopatin

Role at the time: Michigan rabbi and Jewish communal leader

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"nonapology apology"
Why we used this label

The criticism directly challenges the sufficiency and substance of the apology.

JD Vance

Role at the time: Vice president of the United States

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"A person who will apologize for a murderer so long as he looks the right way."
Why we used this label

This is a strong condemnation, but Vance's wording overstates El-Sayed's literal statement, which repeatedly condemned the attack.

Michael Horowitz

Role at the time: Michigan Democratic activist

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's immediate response should have stopped at an unqualified condemnation; adding causal context at that moment was a mistake.

"insufficient"
Why we used this label

He treated the apology as inadequate and politically calculated rather than a sufficient correction.

Jonathan Chait

Role at the time: Political writer, The Atlantic

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording functioned as an implied threat against American Jews.

"a barely veiled anti-Semitic threat"
Why we used this label

The quoted phrase explicitly characterizes the remarks as both antisemitic and threatening.

Jon Ossoff

Role at the time: United States senator from Georgia

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"I unreservedly reject reckless and dangerous rhetoric suggesting that policy advocacy invites violence against the Jewish community or any community."
Why we used this label

Ossoff expressly rejects the framing as reckless and dangerous.

David Frum

Role at the time: Host, The David Frum Show; staff writer

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording functioned as an implied threat against American Jews.

"That’s a pretty contemptible offer. You’ll guarantee my physical safety if I submit?"
Why we used this label

The response treats the passage as a coercive implied threat rather than a neutral warning.

Nick Fuentes

Role at the time: Host, America First

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"He does justify violence against Jews, and that’s unacceptable. He’s a real anti-Semite."
Why we used this label

The wording is an explicit condemnation, but Fuentes also said he had not heard the exact statement; that limits its evidentiary weight.

America First Ep. 1739 — Nick Fuentes discusses Hasan Piker (opens in a new tab)Transcript anchor #text-8833; player timestamp requires verification

Dana Nessel

Role at the time: Michigan attorney general

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"making excuses for an attempted mass killing of children"
Why we used this label

This is direct Democratic criticism grounded in the impact of the framing on the targeted community.

Ben Shapiro

Role at the time: Host, The Ben Shapiro Show; columnist

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording functioned as an implied threat against American Jews.

"He also spent the weekend suggesting that Jews who support Israel are fair game."
Why we used this label

Describing people as “fair game” treats the wording as threatening or permissive toward harm.

Cory Booker

Role at the time: United States senator from New Jersey

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"Hasan Piker's dangerous and hateful language targeting Jewish Americans has no place in our civic discourse."
Why we used this label

Booker explicitly characterizes Piker's language as dangerous and hateful.

Elissa Slotkin

Role at the time: United States senator from Michigan

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"This shouldn't be hard: no community should face the threat of violence for their political views."
Why we used this label

Slotkin rejects the attribution of responsibility to people targeted for political views.

Andrew Kolvet

Role at the time: Host, The Charlie Kirk Show

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s passage was antisemitic.

"this guy openly salivates when it comes to political violence. And here he is attacking another Jewish Democrat."
Why we used this label

The statement is a direct moral condemnation that frames the passage as hostile and violence-adjacent.

Brad Sherman

Role at the time: U.S. representative

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording encouraged or justified violence against American Jews.

"Hasan Piker is trying to encourage and justify violence against American Jews."
Why we used this label

The statement directly attributes encouragement and justification of violence to Piker.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate and former Wayne County health director

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"Antisemitism is a scourge, and we need to address it in all its forms."
Why we used this label

El-Sayed condemns antisemitism and rejects rhetoric that endangers the Jewish community.

Jeremy Moss

Role at the time: Michigan state senator

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s remarks about American Jews, Israel, and antisemitic violence

"We will not be lectured by a California podcaster about what Oakland County, Michigan's Jewish community should and shouldn't believe."
Why we used this label

Moss rejects Piker's framing and describes it as blaming Jewish people for antisemitic harm.

Hakeem Jeffries

Role at the time: House Democratic leader and U.S. representative

Condemned

Responding to

Piker’s wording assigned American Jews responsibility for antisemitic violence directed at them.

"The malicious claim that American Jews are inviting violence against themselves is dangerous and antisemitic."
Why we used this label

The statement explicitly labels the disputed claim dangerous and antisemitic.

Scott Jennings

Role at the time: Republican political strategist and CNN political commentator

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"That's how you would justify any and all political violence. That is a dangerous mindset."
Why we used this label

The statement directly rejects the explanation-versus-justification distinction at the center of the dispute.

Noah Rothman

Role at the time: Senior writer at National Review

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"He agonized over whether to condemn an Islamist attack on a Michigan synagogue in which Jewish children were targets."
Why we used this label

The authored article treats El-Sayed's contextualization as a failure to distinguish terrorism from Israeli military action.

Josh Gottheimer

Role at the time: U.S. Representative; co-introducer of the resolution

Condemned

Responding to

Hasan Piker’s “Hamas over Israel” comparison

"We cannot be selective in calling out antisemitism."
Why we used this label

An official statement condemning Piker's rhetoric in a resolution that includes the comparison. The classification is not a claim that Gottheimer's quoted words addressed only this statement.

Gottheimer and Lawler introduce resolution condemning Piker’s rhetoric (opens in a new tab) - Josh GottheimerGottheimer statement; release linking the introduced resolution. The resolution cites Piker's Hamas-over-Israel comparison among other statements.

Anti-Defamation League

Role at the time: Advocacy organization; institutional analysis

Condemned

Responding to

Piker's Hamas-over-Israel comparison helps whitewash Hamas's violence.

"sanitizes and justifies violence and terrorism against the State of Israel"
Why we used this label

An explicit institutional judgment tied to the comparison; not an attributed personal statement by an ADL official.

ADL — Hasan Piker: What You Need to Know (opens in a new tab) - Anti-Defamation LeagueRhetorical Themes; Support for Terror and Violence; Celebrating or whitewashing U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations.
Older statements

People with useful coverage

Christine Hong

Christine Hong is a professor of critical race and ethnic studies at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Her scholarship addresses race, militarism, and Asian American studies, and she participates in the UC Ethnic Studies Council.

1 case and 1 statement

Robert Reich

Robert Reich is an American author, public-policy scholar, and former United States secretary of labor. His writing and videos examine economic inequality, political power, and American government.

1 case and 1 statement

Chili Tropper

Israeli politician and member of the Knesset.

1 case and 1 statement

Yair Lapid

Israeli opposition politician and former prime minister.

1 case and 1 statement

Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin is a Democratic United States representative from Maryland and a constitutional-law scholar. He serves on the House Judiciary Committee and previously taught constitutional law.

1 case and 1 statement

Max Blumenthal

American journalist, editor of The Grayzone, and commentator on U.S. foreign policy and the Middle East.

1 case and 1 statement

Xochitl Hinojosa

Xochitl Hinojosa is a Democratic political strategist and commentator.

1 case and 1 statement

Rabbi Asher Lopatin

Asher Lopatin is a Michigan rabbi and Jewish communal leader.

1 case and 1 statement

JD Vance

JD Vance is the vice president of the United States and a former U.S. senator from Ohio. A Marine Corps veteran, he worked as a startup investor and wrote the memoir Hillbilly Elegy before his Senate election.

1 case and 1 statement

Andrew Kolvet

Andrew Kolvet is a political media host and spokesperson associated with Turning Point USA and The Charlie Kirk Show.

2 cases and 2 statements

Cenk Uygur

Progressive political commentator and co-founder and host of The Young Turks.

2 cases and 2 statements

Ana Kasparian

Political commentator, producer, and co-host of The Young Turks, known for progressive and heterodox commentary.

2 cases and 2 statements

More people