All topics

European Union

Public disputes concerning the European Union, its institutions, its member states' shared decisions, and its relationships with countries outside the bloc.

Published coverage on this page: 1 case · 2 statements. Statements are ordered newest first.

Related cases

Statements

Filter by response label (1 selected)

Labels describe a response to the linked claim or the action explained in the statement summary. Choose one or more.

2 matching statements

Josh Udall

Role at the time: Host of The Elevate Report, a Canadian politics podcast and Substack, speaking on his own programme

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

On the September 16 episode of his podcast The Elevate Report, host Josh Udall opened with an extended sarcastic passage treating Ursula von der Leyen's associate-membership offer as another announcement without substance from Mark Carney, then set out his own position: he supports expanding trade with the European Union but objects to closer regulatory and cultural alignment, citing the digital trade agreement and recent EU lawmaking. After reading Pierre Poilievre's red lines on taxes, laws and immigration, Udall said there was nothing in them he disagreed with and that they were "spot on," and argued that pursuing closer ties the way the government appears to want would require giving up some sovereignty. His characterisations of Carney's record and of EU lawmaking are his own.

Quotation excerpt

Sure, I think deeper trade EU is great. If we can expand trade with them, awesome. … But to culturally get closer to them, that's what makes me nervous. This whole digital trade agreement, seeing what we've been seeing in the EU and the…
Read full quotation
Sure, I think deeper trade EU is great. If we can expand trade with them, awesome. … But to culturally get closer to them, that's what makes me nervous. This whole digital trade agreement, seeing what we've been seeing in the EU and the laws they've been trying to pass, no thank you. … There's nothing he said there that I disagree with. It's spot on. … So what does an associate membership really mean? Because it looks like you keep wanting to get closer to them. You're going to have to give up some type of sovereignty if you want to do it the way that you seem to want to be doing it.
Open source (opens in a new tab)The Elevate Report: "EU Opens Up 'Associate' Membership to Canada | Diplomats Push Back!"32:52–33:16: support for deeper trade and objection to closer regulatory and cultural alignment; 33:19–33:36: reads a Sam Cooper post on sovereignty; 36:21–36:53: reads Pierre Poilievre's red lines; 36:54–37:12: endorses them and asks what associate membership would require.

What this label refers to

This dossier's fixed reference point is the proposition that Canada should become an associate member of the European Union. Udall combines materially different positions on it: he endorses deeper trade with the EU without qualification, while rejecting the regulatory and cultural convergence he believes the arrangement would entail and asserting it would cost sovereignty. That is the same shape as Pierre Poilievre (945), whose red lines Udall expressly adopts, and both are classified mixed_or_conditional. The closest competing label is condemns, used here for Andrew Scheer (950), who rejects associate membership outright as a sovereignty question; it loses because Udall's "no thank you" is directed at cultural and legal alignment specifically, immediately after he calls expanded trade "great" and "awesome," so he does not reject the arrangement as such.

Pierre Poilievre

Role at the time: Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Poilievre said the terms of any arrangement have not been disclosed and that Canada already has tariff-free access to the European market for almost all its goods and services. He set out three conditions on which he would judge it a disaster: Canadians paying taxes to Brussels, following European laws they did not vote on, or adopting European immigration policy. He has separately said Parliament should decide.

Quotation excerpt

Nobody knows because he won’t say. We already have free trade with Europe … 99 per cent of our products and services can enter the European market tariff-free.” … “That leaves very little left for him to sign. You know, if he’s talking…
Read full quotation
Nobody knows because he won’t say. We already have free trade with Europe … 99 per cent of our products and services can enter the European market tariff-free.” … “That leaves very little left for him to sign. You know, if he’s talking about forcing Canadians to pay taxes to Brussels bureaucrats or to follow European Union laws that we never voted on, or God forbid, to bring European policies for immigration, that would be a disaster for Canada.
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Poilievre interview on the EU associate-member proposalPoilievre's red lines on taxes, laws and immigration, and on the absence of published terms

What this label refers to

Relative to whether Canada should become an associate member of the European Union, Poilievre neither endorses the proposition nor rejects it outright. His stated conclusion depends on an express unresolved condition, namely what the arrangement turns out to contain, which is the definition of a conditional position. He is plainly hostile in tone and flatly critical of the process, but the criticism of secrecy targets how the proposal has been handled rather than the proposal itself. Reporting that renders his conditions as warnings that Canada would fund the EU budget, follow Brussels regulation and cede immigration control turns questions into assertions, and this record deliberately does not follow it.

People in this topic

Mark Carney

Prime minister of Canada.

1 case and 1 statement

Josh Udall

Canadian political commentator and host of The Elevate Report, a daily Canadian politics podcast and Substack newsletter also published as The Elev8 Podcast. He previously worked in user-experience design and founded the design firm Depth in 2020.

1 case and 1 statement

Stéphane Dion

Canadian former politician and diplomat, now the first diplomat in residence at the Université de Montréal's Faculty of Arts and Science. He was Canada's ambassador to Germany from 2017 to 2022 and to France and Monaco from 2022 to 2025, and special envoy to the European Union and Europe from 2017 to 2025. He previously served as minister of foreign affairs, minister of the environment and minister of intergovernmental affairs, and led the Liberal Party from 2006 to 2008.

1 case and 1 statement

Andrew Scheer

Conservative member of Parliament for Regina-Qu'Appelle and House Leader of the Official Opposition. He was the 35th Speaker of the House of Commons and led the Conservative Party of Canada from 2017 to 2020.

1 case and 1 statement

Jonathan Wilkinson

Canada's ambassador to the European Union, appointed in 2026. He previously served in cabinet as minister of fisheries and oceans, of environment and climate change, and of energy and natural resources, and as member of Parliament for North Vancouver.

1 case and 1 statement

Pierre Poilievre

Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and Leader of the Official Opposition in the House of Commons.

1 case and 1 statement

Ursula von der Leyen

President of the European Commission, the European Union's executive body, which proposes legislation and negotiates international agreements on the Union's behalf.

1 case and 1 statement

Donald Trump

Donald Trump is the 45th and 47th president of the United States. Before entering national politics, he worked in real estate development and entertainment.

1 case and 1 statement