All topics

2026 Midterm Elections

Public disputes concerning the 2026 U.S. midterm election cycle, including campaigns, candidates, conventions, advertising, endorsements, and election-related policy promises.

Related cases

Statements

Jon Favreau

Role at the time: Pod Save America co-host discussing the general-election attack strategy

Condemned

Responding to

Mike Rogers’s 9/11 accusation against Abdul El-Sayed

"I think you got to pick one."
Why we used this label

He criticizes how the attack is constructed while acknowledging why campaigns combine unpopular associations. The classification concerns his qualified assessment of the ad, not endorsement or rejection of the belief Rogers attributed to El-Sayed. The wording and speaker sequence were checked against the official full audio.

Bonus: Abdul El-Sayed Wins in Michigan feat. Bernie Sanders (opens in a new tab)Official full audio 20:06–24:23; Pfeiffer at 22:18–22:21 and Favreau at 22:21–22:23

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, interviewed by Jacob Soboroff on All In

Condemned

Responding to

Abdul El-Sayed believes the United States deserved the September 11 attacks.

"So they’re going to use Islamophobia because their ideas are tired."
Why we used this label

The direct interview condemns divisive campaign conduct rather than just correcting attribution. Original reporting ties the answer specifically to the accusation; broader criticisms do not erase that link.

El-Sayed responds to Rogers’s attacks in his August 5 All In interview (opens in a new tab)Original interview embedded at top, dated August 5; paragraphs quoting El-Sayed on division and Islamophobia

Mike Rogers

Role at the time: Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, issuing an official campaign statement

Condemned

Responding to

Abdul El-Sayed believes the United States deserved the September 11 attacks.

"Never in a million years did I think that I would be running against someone who believes America deserved 9/11."
Why we used this label

The accusation is an explicit adverse judgment about El-Sayed’s beliefs and fitness for office.

Mike Rogers’s August 5 statement following the Michigan Senate primary (opens in a new tab) - Mike RogersParagraph beginning with Rogers’s counterterrorism experience and ending with the accusation about America deserving 9/11

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: Democratic U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan, interviewed on Fox & Friends

Mixed or conditional

Responding to

Appearing at a political event with Hasan Piker does not establish agreement with all of Piker’s statements.

"Of course I don’t think 9/11 was justified."
Why we used this label

He combined rejection of the underlying sentiment with a defense of the campaign appearance; neither unconditional endorsement nor complete disavowal describes both parts.

El-Sayed rejects justifying 9/11 while defending campaigning with Hasan Piker (opens in a new tab)Opening interview quotations about 9/11 and appearing with someone without agreeing; embedded video 6392681742112

Tim Miller

Role at the time: Host of The Bulwark Podcast

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"Anyone who would think a statement condemning a terorrist attack on a synagogue is a 'risk' is insane and should be fired from the campaign."
Why we used this label

The authored post directly rejects the political hesitation surrounding condemnation of the attack.

Mike Rogers

Role at the time: Republican U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Condemned

Responding to

El-Sayed's cycle-of-violence framing rationalized the antisemitic attack or improperly shifted explanatory responsibility toward Israel and Jews.

"If you're having a moral crisis over whether to condemn terrorism, you're unfit for office."
Why we used this label

The statement treats El-Sayed's contextualization as disqualifying sympathy for the assailant.

Abdul El-Sayed

Role at the time: U.S. Senate candidate in Michigan

Defended or excused

Responding to

The Temple Israel attack should be understood in part through the cycle of violence created by the regional war and the Israeli airstrike that killed members of the assailant's family.

"It was a risk."
Why we used this label

On the recorded campaign call he positively justifies publishing his explanation as principled leadership. This is substantive defense of his decision, not merely disputing a label.

People with useful coverage

Wanda Townes

Georgia Democratic Party organizer and county-party chair.

1 case and 1 statement

Aaron Parnas

American attorney, political commentator, and digital-media publisher.

1 case and 1 statement

David Axelrod

Democratic political strategist and former senior adviser to President Barack Obama.

1 case and 1 statement

Natalie Harp

White House executive assistant and longtime aide to President Donald Trump.

1 case

Jon Ossoff

United States senator from Georgia.

3 cases and 3 statements

Scott Jennings

Republican political strategist and CNN political commentator.

1 case and 1 statement

Alyssa Brouillet

Alyssa Brouillet is a political communications professional and spokesperson for Mike Rogers’s U.S. Senate campaign in Michigan. Her previous work includes roles associated with Iowa officials Brenna Bird and Kim Reynolds.

1 case and 1 statement

Dan Pfeiffer

Dan Pfeiffer is a political commentator and co-host of Pod Save America.

1 case and 1 statement

Jon Favreau

Former White House speechwriter, political commentator, and co-host of Pod Save America.

1 case and 1 statement