United States Representative and Republican candidate for U.S. House in Michigan's 7th district.
Case
Networked automated license-plate cameras can assemble searchable records of vehicle movements. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to ban the systems, keep them with limits, or defend them as investigative tools. This tracker separates outright bans from narrower restrictions.
Case
An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 midterm candidates stand on the unauthorized Iran war, based on their votes on war-powers resolutions, campaign statements, and public remarks.
Role at the time: U.S. representative for Michigan's 7th district and Republican candidate for reelection, in an emailed statement from his press office
Statement summary
Rep. Tom Barrett's press office told Dispute Index that the War Powers Act's 60-day period for the Iran conflict expired on May 1, and that Barrett has voted for every war powers resolution since then to enforce the act and end the conflict without congressional authorization.
“Congressman Barrett has voted in favor of every War Powers Resolution since that date to enforce the War Powers Act and end the conflict in the absence of congressional authorization.”
The War Powers Act of 1973 delegates some authority to the president for up to 60 days. That time period for the Iran conflict expired on May 1, and Congressman Barrett has voted in favor of every War Powers Resolution since that date to enforce the War Powers Act and end the conflict in the absence of congressional authorization.
The case tracks support for continued U.S. military operations against Iran, including whether a candidate would vote for a war powers resolution to remove U.S. forces from hostilities. Barrett's office says he has voted for every such resolution since May 1 to end the conflict absent congressional authorization, which opposes continuing the operation without Congress, so we labeled it Condemned. In March he said the president had earned the opportunity to resolve the conflict, a statement recorded separately on this case.
Role at the time: U.S. Representative, Michigan 7th district
Statement summary
Tom Barrett voted Yea on H.Con.Res. 93, the House resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
“On Agreeing to the Resolution: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
A yea vote supported directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, opposing continued U.S. involvement in the war without congressional authorization.
Role at the time: U.S. representative and 2026 Republican House candidate in Michigan, through a spokesperson
Statement summary
Barrett's campaign urged local transparency and opposed federal control of local camera decisions. Barrett later supported barring federal agencies from buying the systems.
“State and local governments should engage with their residents on those decisions but that should include full transparency.”
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Barrett's campaign said state and local governments should engage residents on camera decisions with full transparency. It addressed oversight rather than a ban, so Mixed or conditional fits.
Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Michigan at the statement date.
Statement summary
Barrett rejects continued military operations without congressional authorization while supporting a limited authorized mission against Iran’s nuclear program.
“Only Congress has the authority to authorize military action in Iran.”
Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Barrett rejects continued military operations without congressional authorization while supporting a limited authorized mission against Iran’s nuclear program.
Role at the time: U.S. representative for Michigan's 7th district, in a Fox News opinion piece
Statement summary
In a Fox News opinion piece, Rep. Tom Barrett wrote that the War Powers Act gives the president up to 60 days before Congress must consent, that when that period expired for the Iran conflict he felt compelled to enforce it, and that the people's representatives must have a say on war even as Iran must never get a nuclear weapon.
“When that timeline expired for the conflict in Iran, I felt compelled to enforce it for one simple reason”
The case tracks support for continued U.S. military operations against Iran, including whether a candidate would vote for a war powers resolution to remove U.S. forces from hostilities. Barrett writes that he acted to enforce the War Powers Act's 60-day limit once it expired for the Iran conflict, which opposes continuing the operation without congressional consent, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because he also writes that Iran must never get a nuclear weapon. We did not use it because he does not tie that goal to continuing the operation.
Role at the time: U.S. Representative for Michigan at the statement date.
Statement summary
Barrett supports giving Trump an opportunity to resolve the Iran conflict quickly and with minimal casualties.
“President Trump has earned the opportunity to resolve this conflict quickly and with minimal casualties.”
Relative to U.S. military involvement in the 2026 Iran war, Barrett supports giving Trump an opportunity to resolve the Iran conflict quickly and with minimal casualties.
Statement dates: March 5, 2026 to October 5, 2026
Statement dates: March 5, 2026 to October 5, 2026
Statement dates: September 4, 2026
Statement dates: September 4, 2026
Statement dates: September 4, 2026
Statement dates: March 5, 2026 to October 5, 2026
