Barrett campaign calls for local transparency
U.S. representative and 2026 Republican House candidate in Michigan, through a spokesperson
“State and local governments should engage with their residents on those decisions but that should include full transparency.”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Original reporting on El-Sayed advertisement, Lawrence, Barrett, and Abbott
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
ABC News sought Barrett's view as Flock cameras became an issue in his House race.
After the quotation
His position addresses oversight and federal purchasing, not a ban on all local license-plate camera networks.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Barrett's campaign said state and local governments should engage residents on camera decisions with full transparency. It addressed oversight rather than a ban, so Mixed or conditional fits.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement