Richard von Glahn

Executive director of People Not Politicians, a Missouri political advocacy group.

What we have documented

We have documented 3 statements by Richard von Glahn, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Missouri's map fight after the Supreme Court order

We'll email you if anyone seeks further Supreme Court review, when Missouri voters decide Proposition A, or if state officials respond to the order.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Richard von Glahn

Richard von Glahn

Role at the time: Executive director of People Not Politicians, the group that circulated the referendum petition, in a statement released after the U.S. Supreme Court's order

Condemned

Response to this claim

Under the Missouri Constitution, the referendum petition kept House Bill 1 from taking effect, so the 2022 map is the only valid congressional map and must be used in the 2026 general election.

“We are done with corrupt politicians trying to force their map into effect outside the process outlined in the Missouri constitution. We have said from the beginning, people, not politicians will be the final deciders on this DC power grab. We are moving forward to vote NO on Proposition A.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Redistricting battle ends: US Supreme Court says Missouri must use 2022 mapArticle posted September 25, 2026 5:50 PM CDT; paragraph reproducing the statement of Richard von Glahn
Why we used this label

The reference point is use of the 2025 map in the 2026 general election. Von Glahn says the group is done with efforts to force the map into effect outside the process in the Missouri constitution, which rejects using the 2025 map. The closest competing label, “Challenged the characterization”, loses because the statement objects to the effort to use the map and does more than dispute a description of it.

Richard von Glahn

Role at the time: Executive director of People Not Politicians, the group that circulated the referendum petition and intervened in the federal case

Condemned

Response to this claim

Ordering Missouri to return to the 2025 map after ballots have been printed and mailed and voting has begun would create the electoral disorder that the Purcell principle exists to prevent.

“Ballots have been printed, and Missourians have already voted … Thousands more will vote before this order seeks to take effect. Officials should stop wasting taxpayers’ money on pointless legal action and instead focus on administering our elections.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Appeals court backs Missouri's gerrymandered map, but decision is put on hold · Missouri IndependentArticle, September 21, 2026
Why we used this label

The reference point is use of the 2025 map in the 2026 general election. Von Glahn says ballots have been printed and voting has begun, calls the legal effort to change the map "pointless" and says he expects the 2022 map to be used, which opposes using the 2025 map. The closest competing label, “Challenged the characterization”, loses because he opposes the outcome rather than disputing a description.

Richard von Glahn

Role at the time: Executive director of People Not Politicians, the group that circulated the referendum petition and intervened in the federal case

Condemned

Response to this claim

Under the Missouri Constitution, the referendum petition kept House Bill 1 from taking effect, so the 2022 map is the only valid congressional map and must be used in the 2026 general election.

“The law is the law, the Missouri constitution is clear as was the Missouri Supreme Court … People, not politicians, will have the final say when they vote NO on Proposition A this November.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Supreme Court blocks Republican-favored Missouri election map, ending legal whiplash · ABC NewsArticle, September 10, 2026, statement of Richard von Glahn
Why we used this label

The reference point is use of the 2025 map in the 2026 general election. Von Glahn welcomes the stay that leaves the 2022 map in place and says Missouri law is clear, which opposes using the 2025 map. The closest competing label, “Challenged the characterization”, loses because he defends the outcome as required by law rather than disputing a description.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage