Dillguy9 / Wikimedia CommonsSourceCC0 1.0Resized and converted to PNG with a plain margin.
John J. Kulewicz is an attorney and member of Upper Arlington City Council in Ohio. He was reelected to a council term that began in January 2024. He spent more than four decades at Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease and graduated from Ohio State University and Yale Law School. He is the Democratic nominee for Ohio attorney general in 2026. His legal career included appellate litigation and a clerkship with Sixth Circuit Judge Gilbert S. Merritt. He was also president of the Columbus Zoo board and of Catholic Social Services. He joined Vorys in 1981 and remained a partner through 2024. His community service has also included the Ohio Historical Society and the Ohio Bicentennial Commission.
We have documented 1 statement by John J. Kulewicz, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.
Case updates
Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras
Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.
Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.
Role at the time: Democratic nominee for Ohio attorney general and Upper Arlington council member
Mixed or conditional
Statement summary
Kulewicz called for a broad Ohio data privacy law that would limit what companies such as Flock may collect and how the information may be used. He argued that a plan to punish misuse after it occurs does not go far enough.
“Any legislation should limit the collection and use of personal data and ban the misuse of any collected data”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Candidates for Ohio attorney general address Flock cameras controversy, make proposalsFaber's plan
Why we used this label
He seeks limits on collection and use without taking an explicit all-or-nothing position on the cameras' existence.
Networked automated license-plate cameras can assemble searchable records of vehicle movements. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to ban the systems, keep them with limits, or defend them as investigative tools. This tracker separates outright bans from narrower restrictions.
