John Kulewicz seeks broader limits on Flock data collection
Democratic nominee for Ohio attorney general and Upper Arlington council member
“Any legislation should limit the collection and use of personal data and ban the misuse of any collected data”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Ohio Capital Journal directly quotes Faber's campaign release and Kulewicz's statement about whether Flock cameras should remain available and how data collection should be limited.
Before the quotation
Kulewicz answered a question about Faber's plan to keep Flock cameras while criminalizing misuse.
After the quotation
He argued that limits should reach the data a private company collects and the uses of that data, alongside improper searches by individual officers.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
He seeks limits on collection and use without taking an explicit all-or-nothing position on the cameras' existence.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement